Literature DB >> 30503268

Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted right colectomy compared with laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shixun Ma1, Yan Chen2, Yifeng Chen3, Tiankang Guo4, Xiongfei Yang5, Yufeng Lu6, Jinhui Tian7, Hui Cai8.   

Abstract

To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted right colectomy (RRC) with conventional laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published studies. All published literature for comparative studies reporting preoperative outcomes of RRC and LRC were searched. We searched the databases included Cochrane Library of Clinical Comparative Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) from 1973 to 2018. The censor date was up to January 2018. Operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, conversion rates to open surgery, postoperative complications, and related outcomes were evaluated. All calculations and statistical tests were performed using Stata 12.0 software. A total of 7769 patients with colon cancer enrolled in 13 trials were divided into a study group (n = 674) and a control group (n = 7095). Meta-analysis suggested significantly greater length of hospital stay in the LRC group [MD = -0.85; 95% CI: -1.07 to -0.63; P < 0.00001]. Robotic surgery was also associated with a significantly lower complication rate [OR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.01; P = 0.05]. There were statistically significant differences between the groups in estimated blood loss [MD = -16.89; 95% CI: -24.80 to -8.98; P < 0.00001] and the rate of intraoperative conversion to open surgery [OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.75; P = 0.008)], but these differences were not clinically relevant. The recovery of bowel function in two groups is no significant differences [MD = -0.58, 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.20, P = 0.0008]. However, operation times [MD = 43.61, 95% CI: 39.11 to 48.10, P < 0.00001] were longer for RRC than for LRC. Compared to LRC, RRC was associated with reduced estimated blood loss, reduced postoperative complications, longer operation times. Recovery of bowel function and other perioperative outcomes were equivalent between the two surgeries.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic; Meta-analysis; Right colectomy; Robotic-assisted; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30503268     DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  8 in total

1.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S H Emile; H Elfeki; M Shalaby; A Sakr; M Bassuni; P Christensen; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic technique for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticular disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Giuliani; Francesco Guerra; Diego Coletta; Antonio Giuliani; Lucia Salvischiani; Angela Tribuzi; Giuseppe Caravaglios; Alfredo Genovese; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Robotic-assisted Surgery: Expanding Indication to Colon Cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Shinichi Yamauchi; Marie Hanaoka; Noriko Iwata; Taiki Masuda; Masanori Tokunaga; Yusuke Kinugasa
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 4.  Short- and Long-Term Outcome of Laparoscopic- versus Robotic-Assisted Right Colectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peter Tschann; Philipp Szeverinski; Markus P Weigl; Stephanie Rauch; Daniel Lechner; Stephanie Adler; Paolo N C Girotti; Patrick Clemens; Veronika Tschann; Jaroslav Presl; Philipp Schredl; Christof Mittermair; Tarkan Jäger; Klaus Emmanuel; Ingmar Königsrainer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  A comparative analysis of outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic elective (procto-) colectomies for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  Sergio Huerta; Jennie Meier; Valerie-Sue Emuakhagbon; Juan Favela; Madison Argo; Patricio M Polanco; Mathew M Augustine; Thai Pham
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-03-21

6.  Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision with Central Vascular Ligation for Right Colon Cancer: Surgical Technique and Short-term Outcomes.

Authors:  C Ramachandra; Pavan Sugoor; Uday Karjol; Ravi Arjunan; Syed Altaf; Vijay Patil; Harish Kumar; G Beesanna; M Abhishek
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01

7.  Improved perioperative outcomes and reduced inflammatory stress response in malignant robot-assisted colorectal resections: a retrospective cohort study of 298 patients.

Authors:  Pedja Cuk; Randi Maria Simonsen; Mirjana Komljen; Michael Festersen Nielsen; Per Helligsø; Andreas Kristian Pedersen; Christian Backer Mogensen; Mark Bremholm Ellebæk
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial training for surgical novices in an ex vivo porcine model: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  E Willuth; S F Hardon; F Lang; C M Haney; E A Felinska; K F Kowalewski; B P Müller-Stich; T Horeman; F Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.