Aurélie De Bruycker1, Elise De Bleser2, Karel Decaestecker2, Valérie Fonteyne3, Nicolaas Lumen2, Pieter De Visschere4, Kathia De Man5, Louke Delrue4, Bieke Lambert6, Piet Ost7. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: aurelie.debruycker@ugent.be. 2. Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 4. Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. 5. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, AZ Maria Middelares and AZ Jan Palfijn, Ghent, Belgium; Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: piet.ost@ugent.be.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with biochemical recurrence following primary prostate cancer (PCa) treatment often experience relapse in the lymph nodes (LNs). Both salvage LN dissection (sLND) and elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) are potential treatment options. OBJECTIVE: To describe anatomic patterns of nodal oligorecurrent PCa in relation to different surgical and radiotherapy templates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with biochemical recurrence following primary PCa treatment were eligible for 18F-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT). Patients with five or fewer LN recurrences (N1/M1a) were eligible for the current retrospective analysis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: All LN recurrences were mapped on a reference patient CT, as well as different surgical templates (limited to superextended) and an adapted version of the PIVOTAL ENRT template, blinded for the recurrences. Descriptive statistics were used to report recurrences in relation to the different templates and to compare LN coverage between templates. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 158 LN recurrences (N1: 88; M1a: 70) in 82 patients (median age: 67yr; prostate-specific antigen [PSA]: 3.1ng/ml; PSA doubling time of 7.8mo at the time of clinical recurrence) were mapped. In 49% of patients, recurrences were exclusively located in the true pelvis, followed by the common iliac LN (10%), retroperitoneal/inguinal LN (10%), or a combination (31%). There was up to 40% volume overlap between ENRT and the surgical templates. Theoretically, with ENRT more patients are fully covered (p<0.02) and the total number of covered lesions is higher (p<0.001) when compared to all types of sLND, except for superextended sLND, which is comparable to ENRT (patient-level: p=0.6; lesion-level: p=0.09). With 22% of all 158 lesions located outside all templates (N1: 7%; M1a: 15%), at least 31% of all 82 patients would not be salvaged using any of the templates. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of nodal recurrences are located outside the true pelvis. Limited or standard extended sLND is considered insufficient as a salvage treatment approach and is thus not recommended for use. To maximize treatment outcomes for nodal recurrences, ENRT or superextended sLND should be preferred. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared two possible treatment options, elective nodal radiotherapy and salvage lymph node dissection, for patients with prostate cancer recurrence limited to five or fewer lymph nodes and reported the nodal distrubution. Radiotherapy and surgery cover different areas with possible different outcomes.
BACKGROUND:Patients with biochemical recurrence following primary prostate cancer (PCa) treatment often experience relapse in the lymph nodes (LNs). Both salvage LN dissection (sLND) and elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) are potential treatment options. OBJECTIVE: To describe anatomic patterns of nodal oligorecurrent PCa in relation to different surgical and radiotherapy templates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with biochemical recurrence following primary PCa treatment were eligible for 18F-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT). Patients with five or fewer LN recurrences (N1/M1a) were eligible for the current retrospective analysis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: All LN recurrences were mapped on a reference patient CT, as well as different surgical templates (limited to superextended) and an adapted version of the PIVOTAL ENRT template, blinded for the recurrences. Descriptive statistics were used to report recurrences in relation to the different templates and to compare LN coverage between templates. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 158 LN recurrences (N1: 88; M1a: 70) in 82 patients (median age: 67yr; prostate-specific antigen [PSA]: 3.1ng/ml; PSA doubling time of 7.8mo at the time of clinical recurrence) were mapped. In 49% of patients, recurrences were exclusively located in the true pelvis, followed by the common iliac LN (10%), retroperitoneal/inguinal LN (10%), or a combination (31%). There was up to 40% volume overlap between ENRT and the surgical templates. Theoretically, with ENRT more patients are fully covered (p<0.02) and the total number of covered lesions is higher (p<0.001) when compared to all types of sLND, except for superextended sLND, which is comparable to ENRT (patient-level: p=0.6; lesion-level: p=0.09). With 22% of all 158 lesions located outside all templates (N1: 7%; M1a: 15%), at least 31% of all 82 patients would not be salvaged using any of the templates. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of nodal recurrences are located outside the true pelvis. Limited or standard extended sLND is considered insufficient as a salvage treatment approach and is thus not recommended for use. To maximize treatment outcomes for nodal recurrences, ENRT or superextended sLND should be preferred. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared two possible treatment options, elective nodal radiotherapy and salvage lymph node dissection, for patients with prostate cancer recurrence limited to five or fewer lymph nodes and reported the nodal distrubution. Radiotherapy and surgery cover different areas with possible different outcomes.
Authors: M Unterrainer; C Eze; H Ilhan; S Marschner; O Roengvoraphoj; N S Schmidt-Hegemann; F Walter; W G Kunz; P Munck Af Rosenschöld; R Jeraj; N L Albert; A L Grosu; M Niyazi; P Bartenstein; C Belka Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Irina Filimonova; Daniela Schmidt; Sina Mansoorian; Thomas Weissmann; Hadi Siavooshhaghighi; Alexander Cavallaro; Torsten Kuwert; Christoph Bert; Benjamin Frey; Luitpold Valentin Distel; Sebastian Lettmaier; Rainer Fietkau; Florian Putz Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: A De Bruycker; A Spiessens; P Dirix; N Koutsouvelis; I Semac; N Liefhooghe; A Gomez-Iturriaga; W Everaerts; F Otte; A Papachristofilou; M Scorsetti; M Shelan; S Siva; F Ameye; M Guckenberger; R Heikkilä; P M Putora; A Zapatero; A Conde-Moreno; F Couñago; F Vanhoutte; E Goetghebeur; D Reynders; T Zilli; P Ost Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Michael Jonathan Kucharczyk; James Man Git Tsui; Farzin Khosrow-Khavar; Boris Bahoric; Luis Souhami; Maurice Anidjar; Stephan Probst; Ahmad Chaddad; Paul Sargos; Tamim Niazi Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 6.244