Literature DB >> 30502935

Persistent morbidity after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction - A registry study with an eight-year follow-up on a nationwide cohort from 1996 to 2014.

Kasper Skriver Gravesen1, Thomas Kallemose2, Lars Blønd3, Anders Troelsen4, Kristoffer Weisskirchner Barfod5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the trends in treatment of patellar dislocation in the Danish population as a whole from 1996 to 2014 and evaluate the incidence of persistent morbidity after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction (MPFL-R).
METHODS: This epidemiological study was performed by retrospectively searching the Danish National Patients Registry from 1996 to 2014. The study investigated the trends in surgery performed on patients with patellar dislocations and the risk of persistent patellar morbidity (PPM) with an eight-year follow-up. PPM was defined as a new patella-related contact to the healthcare system more than a year after surgery.
RESULTS: From 1996 to 2014, a total of 1956 MPFL-R were performed in Denmark. In 2014, MPFL-R constituted 75% of all patella-stabilizing surgery and was performed on almost 10% of patients with patellar dislocation. The mean risk of PPM eight years after surgery was 20.9% (18.3-23.4%), and young patients aged 10-17 showed the highest risk of 28.9% (23.7-33.7%). The risk of PPM over time was significantly higher for other patella-stabilizing surgery (33.8%) and patients receiving conservative treatment (29.4%) compared to MPFL-R.
CONCLUSIONS: A rapid rise in the use of MPFL-R was found from 2005 to 2014, constituting 75% of all patella-stabilizing surgery in 2014. The overall risk of persistent patellar morbidity within eight years after MPFL-R was 21%. MPFL-R was found to give a significantly lower risk of PPM over time as compared to other patella-stabilizing surgery and conservative treatment.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction; Patellar dislocation; Recurrent patellar dislocation; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30502935     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  5 in total

1.  CLINICAL RESULTS OF MEDIAL PATELLOFEMORAL LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION.

Authors:  Roque Gondolfo; Hedipo Seitz Emanuele; João Paulo Fernandes Guerreiro; Alexandre de Oliveira Queiroz; Marcus Vinicius Danieli
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 0.683

2.  Evaluation of Patellar Contact Pressure Changes after Static versus Dynamic Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstructions Using a Finite Element Model.

Authors:  Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso; Gerard Ginovart; Diego Alastruey-López; Erik Montesinos-Berry; Joan Carles Monllau; Angel Alberich-Bayarri; María Angeles Pérez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  Comparing Sex-Specific Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Patellar Instability: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  A J Fancher; A J Hinkle; M L Vopat; K Templeton; A Tarakemeh; B G Vopat; M K Mulcahey
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-29

4.  Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is superior to active rehabilitation in protecting against further patella dislocations.

Authors:  Truls Martin Straume-Næsheim; Per-Henrik Randsborg; Jan Rune Mikaelsen; Asbjørn Årøen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.114

5.  Functional outcome after recurrent patellar dislocation : Comparison of two surgical techniques-Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL) vs. Elmslie Trillat procedure.

Authors:  Mohammad Keilani; Stefano Palma; Richard Crevenna; Camilla Gaudart; Timothy Hasenöhrl; Martin Reschl; Nadine Huto; Stefan Hajdu; Harald K Widhalm
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 1.704

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.