Literature DB >> 30502489

Sera from different age cohorts in Belgium show limited cross-neutralization between the mumps vaccine and outbreak strains.

T Vermeire1, C Barbezange2, A Francart2, A Hamouda2, A Litzroth3, V Hutse2, L Martens4, E Vandermarliere4, S Van Gucht5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Mumps used to affect children between 2 and 15 years old. The mumps-measles-rubella (MMR) vaccine is available, with vaccine coverage rate of about 85% after two vaccine doses. Recently new mumps outbreaks have emerged in highly vaccinated populations; the causes for these new outbreaks are yet unknown. We tested if a difference in seroneutralizing capacity against the vaccine and wild-type viruses existed and if waning immunity could be detected.
METHODS: In this study, 570 serum samples (age group 2-3 years (n = 96), 8-9 years (n = 95), 13-14 years (n = 94), 18-20 years (n = 96), 24-26 years (n = 92) and 50 + years (n = 97)) in Belgium were tested in the rapid fluorescent foci inhibition test for their neutralizing capacity against the vaccine and wild-type viruses.
RESULTS: Neutralizing antibodies against the vaccine strain were present in 84% (81/97) of the 2-3-year, 74% (70/95) of the 8-9-year, 81% (76/94) of the 13-14-year, 76% (73/96) of the 18-20-year, 67% (62/92) of the 24-26-year and 77% (75/97) of the 50+-year age group serum samples. For all age groups, only about half of these serum samples were also positive for the wild-type virus. The geometric mean titres for the vaccine and wild-type virus for all younger age groups, except for 24-26 years, were significantly different, demonstrating poor in vitro cross-neutralization.
CONCLUSIONS: A possible contribution of antigenic differences between the genotype A and G mumps virus as well as other immune factors, in addition to lower-than-optimal vaccination coverage and waning immunity, could explain the poor in vitro cross-neutralization and should be further studied.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mumps virus; Neutralizing antibody; Outbreaks; Protection; RFFIT; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30502489     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  4 in total

1.  Genomic characterization of mumps viruses from a large-scale mumps outbreak in Arkansas, 2016.

Authors:  Duah Alkam; Piroon Jenjaroenpun; Thidathip Wongsurawat; Zulema Udaondo; Preecha Patumcharoenpol; Michael Robeson; Dirk Haselow; William Mason; Intawat Nookaew; David Ussery; Se-Ran Jun
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 2.  Mumps Outbreaks in Vaccinated Populations-Is It Time to Re-assess the Clinical Efficacy of Vaccines?

Authors:  Anna R Connell; Jeff Connell; T Ronan Leahy; Jaythoon Hassan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 3.  Current view on novel vaccine technologies to combat human infectious diseases.

Authors:  Zrinka Matić; Maja Šantak
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  The Role of Nucleoprotein in Immunity to Human Negative-Stranded RNA Viruses-Not Just Another Brick in the Viral Nucleocapsid.

Authors:  Maja Šantak; Zrinka Matić
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.048

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.