Literature DB >> 30502265

The Impact of Breast Lumpectomy Tray Utilization on Cost Savings.

Emily Malone1, Jason Baldwin2, Joshua Richman1, Rachael Lancaster1, Helen Krontiras1, Catherine Parker3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Right-sizing instrument trays reduce processing and replacement costs, physical strain, and turnover times. Historically, a 98-instrument head and neck tray has been used for breast lumpectomy cases at our institution. Observations revealed that many instruments on the tray were not used during the breast cases. With the significant number of surgical breast lumpectomies performed annually, tray downsizing could significantly reduce costs and physical strain.
METHODS: Surgical technicians identified instruments needed for a standard breast lumpectomy. Breast surgeons reviewed the list and made final recommendations. Three of 13 existing head and neck trays were converted to breast lumpectomy trays. The number of breast lumpectomies in 2017 was pulled from the institution's health information system. Instrument quantities were verified using instrument management software. Weights were taken on a digital scale, and processing cost was estimated by a consultant.
RESULTS: The new breast trays included 51 instruments rather than the standard 98-instrument trays. Reprocessing cost decreased from $49.98 to $26.01. With 449 breast lumpectomies performed at the institution in 2017, the annual reprocessing savings totaled $10,763. The tray weight was reduced from 27 to 16 pounds. Setup time decreased from 7 to 4 min per use (22.5 h saved annually).
CONCLUSIONS: Downsizing from a head and neck tray to a specific breast lumpectomy tray demonstrated a reduction in reprocessing cost, tray weight, and setup time. Lighter trays allow for safer handling and transport by surgical personnel. In the current health-care environment, it is important to maximize operating room efficiency and minimize cost.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Breast surgery; Cost savings; Efficiency; Lumpectomy; Operating room; Surgical tray optimization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30502265     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  3 in total

1.  An Enhanced Kaizen Event in a Sterile Processing Department of a Rural Hospital: A Case Study.

Authors:  Valentina Nino; David Claudio; Leonardo Valladares; Sean Harris
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Measuring intraoperative surgical instrument use with radio-frequency identification.

Authors:  Ian Hill; Lindsey Olivere; Joshua Helmkamp; Elliot Le; Westin Hill; John Wahlstedt; Phillip Khoury; Jared Gloria; Marc J Richard; Laura H Rosenberger; Patrick J Codd
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2022-01-19

Review 3.  Approaches to the rationalization of surgical instrument trays: scoping review and research agenda.

Authors:  Bruno Miranda Dos Santos; Flavio Sanson Fogliatto; Carolina Melecardi Zani; Fernanda Araujo Pimentel Peres
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.