OBJECTIVES: Essential tremor (ET) is a movement disorder characterized by action tremor which impacts motor execution. Given the disrupted cerebellar-thalamo-cortical networks in ET, we hypothesized that ET could interfere with the control mechanisms involved in regulating motor performance. The ability to inhibit or stop actions is critical for navigating many daily life situations such as driving or social interactions. The current study investigated the speed of action initiation and two forms of action control, response stopping and proactive slowing in ET. METHODS: Thirty-three ET patients and 25 healthy controls (HCs) completed a choice reaction task and a stop-signal task, and measures of going speed, proactive slowing and stop latencies were assessed. RESULTS: Going speed was significantly slower in ET patients (649 ms) compared to HCs (526 ms; F(1,56) = 42.37; p <.001; η 2 = .43), whereas proactive slowing did not differ between groups. ET patients exhibited slower stop signal reaction times (320 ms) compared to HCs (258 ms, F(1,56) = 15.3; p <.00; η 2 = .22) and more severe motor symptoms of ET were associated with longer stopping latencies in a subset of patients (Spearman rho = .48; p <.05). CONCLUSIONS: In line with previous studies, ET patients showed slower action initiation. Additionally, inhibitory control was impaired whereas proactive slowing remained intact relative to HCs. More severe motor symptoms of ET were associated with slower stopping speed, and may reflect more progressive changes to the cerebellar-thalamo-cortical network. Future imaging studies should specify which structural and functional changes in ET can explain changes in inhibitory action control. (JINS, 2019, 25, 156-164).
OBJECTIVES: Essential tremor (ET) is a movement disorder characterized by action tremor which impacts motor execution. Given the disrupted cerebellar-thalamo-cortical networks in ET, we hypothesized that ET could interfere with the control mechanisms involved in regulating motor performance. The ability to inhibit or stop actions is critical for navigating many daily life situations such as driving or social interactions. The current study investigated the speed of action initiation and two forms of action control, response stopping and proactive slowing in ET. METHODS: Thirty-three ET patients and 25 healthy controls (HCs) completed a choice reaction task and a stop-signal task, and measures of going speed, proactive slowing and stop latencies were assessed. RESULTS: Going speed was significantly slower in ET patients (649 ms) compared to HCs (526 ms; F(1,56) = 42.37; p &lt;.001; η 2 = .43), whereas proactive slowing did not differ between groups. ET patients exhibited slower stop signal reaction times (320 ms) compared to HCs (258 ms, F(1,56) = 15.3; p &lt;.00; η 2 = .22) and more severe motor symptoms of ET were associated with longer stopping latencies in a subset of patients (Spearman rho = .48; p &lt;.05). CONCLUSIONS: In line with previous studies, ET patients showed slower action initiation. Additionally, inhibitory control was impaired whereas proactive slowing remained intact relative to HCs. More severe motor symptoms of ET were associated with slower stopping speed, and may reflect more progressive changes to the cerebellar-thalamo-cortical network. Future imaging studies should specify which structural and functional changes in ET can explain changes in inhibitory action control. (JINS, 2019, 25, 156-164).
Authors: Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Geert J M van Boxtel; Maurits W van der Molen; D Andries Bosch; Johannes D Speelman; Cornelis H M Brunia Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Julián Benito-León; Elan D Louis; Juan Pablo Romero; Juan Antonio Hernández-Tamames; Eva Manzanedo; Juan Álvarez-Linera; Félix Bermejo-Pareja; Ignacio Posada; Eduardo Rocon Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Jessi M Kane; Jessica L McDonnell; Joseph S Neimat; Peter Hedera; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Fenna T Phibbs; Elise B Bradley; Scott A Wylie; Nelleke C van Wouwe Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 2.064
Authors: Nelleke C van Wouwe; Joseph S Neimat; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Shelby B Hughes; Alexander M Lopez; Fenna T Phibbs; Jeffrey D Schall; William J Rodriguez; Elise B Bradley; Benoit M Dawant; Scott A Wylie Journal: Cereb Cortex Commun Date: 2020-11-04