Literature DB >> 30501574

Five Approaches to Qualitative Comparison Groups in Health Research: A Scoping Review.

Sally Lindsay1.   

Abstract

Qualitative researchers have much to gain by using comparison groups. Although their use within qualitative health research is increasing, the guidelines surrounding them are lacking. The purpose of this article is to explore the extent to which qualitative comparison groups are being used within health research and to outline the lessons learned in using this type of methodology. Through conducting a scoping review, 31 articles were identified that demonstrated five different types of qualitative comparison groups. I highlight the key benefits and challenges in using this approach.

Keywords:  comparative analysis; comparison groups; qualitative; scoping review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30501574     DOI: 10.1177/1049732318807208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  8 in total

1.  Acceptability of a Dapivirine/Placebo Gel Administered Rectally to HIV-1 Seronegative Adults (MTN-026).

Authors:  José A Bauermeister; Ryan C Tingler; Clara Dominguez; Eileen F Dunne; Craig Hoesley; Ken Ho; Sherri Johnson; Jonathan Lucas; Nicole Macagna; Elizabeth Brown; Holly Gundacker; Melissa Peda; Cindy E Jacobson; Lindsay Kramzer; Devika Singh; Charlene S Dezzutti; Ratiya Pamela Kunjara Na Ayudhya; Mark A Marzinke; Jeanna Piper; Bríd Devlin; Jeremy Nuttall; Ian McGowan; Craig W Hendrix; Ross D Cranston
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2021-10-17

2.  A Web-Based Intervention for Youth With Physical Disabilities: Comparing the Role of Mentors in 12- and 4-Week Formats.

Authors:  Sally Lindsay; Elaine Cagliostro
Journal:  JMIR Pediatr Parent       Date:  2020-01-08

3.  Perspectives of infant active play: a qualitative comparison of working versus stay-at-home parents.

Authors:  Kailey Snyder; John P Rech; Kim Masuda; Danae Dinkel
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Online Self-Determination Toolkit for Youth With Disabilities: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Sally Lindsay; Polina Kosareva; Mahadeo Sukhai; Nicole Thomson; Jennifer Stinson
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-01-11

5.  Strengthening Communities: A Qualitative Assessment of Opportunities for the Prevention of Adverse Childhood Experiences in the Wake of the Opioid Crisis.

Authors:  Jennifer L Matjasko; Gary Chovnick; Joivita Bradford; Sarah Treves-Kagan; Kristen Usher; Elizabeth Vaughn; Erin Ingoldsby
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2022-01-03

6.  Lessons learned from a pandemic: implications for a combined exercise and educational programme for medical students.

Authors:  Aubree Worobetz; Andrew O' Regan; Monica Casey; Peter Hayes; Mike O' Callaghan; Jane C Walsh; Enrique García Bengoechea; Catherine Woods; Deirdre McGrath; Liam G Glynn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Men's perception of information and psychological distress in the diagnostic phase of prostate cancer: a comparative mixed methods study.

Authors:  Maja Elisabeth Juul Søndergaard; Kirsten Lode; Sissel Eikeland Husebø; Ingvild Dalen; Svein Reidar Kjosavik
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-09-30

8.  Gender and the Symptom Experience before an Atrial Fibrillation Diagnosis.

Authors:  Ryan E Wilson; Kathy L Rush; R Colin Reid; Carol G Laberge
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 1.967

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.