Yuksel Altinel1, Fahad Alkhalfan1, Nidan Qiao2, Marko Velimirovic3. 1. Medical Sciences in Clinical Investigation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Medical Sciences in Clinical Investigation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: norikaisa@gmail.com. 3. Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Optimal surgical strategy for patients with tremor remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating randomized controlled trials of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and lesion surgery (LS) in the treatment of tremor. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database to include randomized clinical trials with either LS, deep brain stimulation, or controls. The outcomes were the change in tremor score, quality of life, cognitive function, and neuropsychiatric function. We used standardized mean differences (SMDs) to pool the outcomes. RESULTS: Fifteen trials, including 1508 patients, met eligibility criteria. We observed no significant difference in change of tremor scale (SMD -0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.38 to 0.24), quality of life (SMD -0.21, 95% CI: -0.69 to 0.27), cognitive function (SMD 0.06, 95% CI: -0.27 to 0.39), or neuropsychiatric function (SMD -0.15, 95% CI: -0.49 to 0.19) between LS and stimulation surgery. We observed heterogeneity across studies during indirect comparison of quality of life. We identified a possible effect modifier: improvement in quality of life correlated with duration of disease (P = 0.035). We found that focused-ultrasound LS was associated with a 0.70 SMD increase (P = 0.014) in quality of life versus DBS in an exploratory subgroup analysis by separating 2 studies with focused-ultrasound LS from other LS studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although the main analysis showed that LS and DBS were equally effective in the treatment of patients with tremor, an exploratory subgroup analysis indicated an improvement in quality of life with noninvasive focused-ultrasound surgery.
INTRODUCTION: Optimal surgical strategy for patients with tremor remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating randomized controlled trials of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and lesion surgery (LS) in the treatment of tremor. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database to include randomized clinical trials with either LS, deep brain stimulation, or controls. The outcomes were the change in tremor score, quality of life, cognitive function, and neuropsychiatric function. We used standardized mean differences (SMDs) to pool the outcomes. RESULTS: Fifteen trials, including 1508 patients, met eligibility criteria. We observed no significant difference in change of tremor scale (SMD -0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.38 to 0.24), quality of life (SMD -0.21, 95% CI: -0.69 to 0.27), cognitive function (SMD 0.06, 95% CI: -0.27 to 0.39), or neuropsychiatric function (SMD -0.15, 95% CI: -0.49 to 0.19) between LS and stimulation surgery. We observed heterogeneity across studies during indirect comparison of quality of life. We identified a possible effect modifier: improvement in quality of life correlated with duration of disease (P = 0.035). We found that focused-ultrasound LS was associated with a 0.70 SMD increase (P = 0.014) in quality of life versus DBS in an exploratory subgroup analysis by separating 2 studies with focused-ultrasound LS from other LS studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although the main analysis showed that LS and DBS were equally effective in the treatment of patients with tremor, an exploratory subgroup analysis indicated an improvement in quality of life with noninvasive focused-ultrasound surgery.