Literature DB >> 30499916

Unattended automated office vs. ambulatory blood pressure in people with high cardiovascular risk: implications for understanding the SPRINT results.

Sverre E Kjeldsen1,2, Giuseppe Mancia3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 30499916     DOI： 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN： 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  The Impact of Measurement Methods on Office Blood Pressure and Management of Hypertension in General Practice.

Authors:  Julia Höller; Linda Elizabeth Villagomez Fuentes; Klaus Matthias; Reinhold Kreutz
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2019-11-09

2.  Determination of optimal on-treatment diastolic blood pressure range using automated measurements in subjects with cardiovascular disease-Analysis of a SPRINT trial subpopulation.

Authors:  Piotr Sobieraj; Jacek Lewandowski; Maciej Siński; Zbigniew Gaciong
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Unattended compared to traditional blood pressure measurement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised cross-over study.

Authors:  Elena Bartoloni; Fabio Angeli; Elisa Marcucci; Carlo Perricone; Giacomo Cafaro; Clara Riccini; Lorenzo Spighi; Benedetta Gildoni; Claudio Cavallini; Paolo Verdecchia; Roberto Gerli
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

4.  More reasons to use automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.