Literature DB >> 30499245

Skeletal muscle reference for Chinese children and adolescents.

Junting Liu1, Yinkun Yan1,2, Bo Xi3, Guimin Huang1, Jie Mi1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Skeletal muscle as an essential body composition component plays an important role in maintenance of normal growth and development as well as systemic glucose metabolism in children. No nationwide reference data for skeletal muscle mass for Chinese youths are available in China. We aimed to establish the sex-specific and age-specific percentile reference values of skeletal muscle mass for Chinese children and adolescents.
METHODS: This study consisted of 10 818 children and adolescents aged 3-17 years in Chinese urban area during 2013-15. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan was performed to measure whole body muscle mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass. Lambda-mu-sigma method was used to obtain the sex-specific and age-specific percentile curves of muscle mass indices.
RESULTS: Overall, whole body muscle mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass indices showed an increasing trend with age for both sexes, with boys vs. girls having higher values of all muscle mass indices. Whole body muscle mass index in boys increased slightly before age 9 years and then increased rapidly until 15 years and slowed down thereafter, while the mean values in girls increased slightly before age 8 years, increased rapidly until 14 years and remained stable thereafter. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass index increased rapidly until age 16 years and then increased slightly for boys; by contrast, for girls, the mean values increased consistently before age 14 years but showed a slightly decreasing trend after that.
CONCLUSIONS: This study established sex-specific and age-specific percentile reference values for skeletal muscle mass for Chinese children and adolescents aged 3-17 years. These reference values can be used to evaluate the muscular development in Chinese children and adolescents.
© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Child; Reference; Skeletal muscle

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30499245      PMCID: PMC6438334          DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle        ISSN: 2190-5991            Impact factor:   12.910


Introduction

Skeletal muscle is an essential body composition component and plays an important role in maintaining normal movement and posture in both adults and children.1 Skeletal muscle is considered as a major site of insulin‐mediated glucose disposal, accounting for 85% of insulin‐mediated glucose utilization.2 A large body of evidence has shown that in youths, high skeletal muscle mass can increase insulin sensitivity,3 and low skeletal muscle mass is associated with multiple metabolic risk factors and insulin resistance.4, 5, 6, 7 In addition, high skeletal muscle mass has been shown to improve bone health through biomechanical stress and multiple myokines.8 Studies have shown that about 40% of bone growth after birth is determined by muscle development.9 Skeletal muscle mass, like bone mineral density,10 increases with age across childhood and adolescence. Therefore, growth curves of skeletal muscle mass in youth need to be established using percentile charts due to the dynamic nature of growth. The growth curves for muscle mass indices can be used to assess the muscle development in healthy children and adolescents and monitor loss of muscle in participants with muscle‐related metabolic diseases. Multiple approaches such as magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance are available for assessment of skeletal muscle. Among them, DXA has been recommended as the preferred detection technology for assessing skeletal muscle loss due to its low radiation, accuracy and strong clinical feasibility.11, 12 Several reference curves for skeletal muscle for youths have been established in UK13 and South Korea.14 However, these reference values are limited by their small sample sizes and absence of data for individuals with age <5 years. To date, there is no reference data of skeletal muscle mass for Chinese youths. Therefore, using large‐scale population‐based data from the China Child and Adolescent Cardiovascular Health (CCACH) Study, we aimed to establish reference values of skeletal muscle measured by DXA for Chinese children and adolescents.

Methods

Study population

The CCACH Study is a large‐scale population‐based cross‐sectional study conducted during 2013–15, which was designed to select a representative sample of children and adolescents aged 3–18 years living in urban areas of China. The detailed information of the survey has been described elsewhere.10 In brief, we firstly stratified China into five regions according to characteristics of climate, economic development and the residents' life habits. Then, we selected one or two capital cities from each region and included a total of seven cities (i.e. Beijing, Tianjin, Changchun, Jinan, Yinchuan, Shanghai and Chongqing). Next, several schools were randomly selected from each city to ensure the representativeness of sex, age and socio‐economic status. All the students (n = 15 548) from the selected schools were invited, and a total of 11 457 participated in a clinical examination, including a questionnaire survey, anthropometric measurements and DXA scan. In the present study, we exclude 639 subjects who met the following criteria: (i) with physical disability or in vivo surgically implanted device and the brace; (ii) with extreme values of height (≥197.5 cm), weight (≥204 kg) or body mass index (BMI) (mean + 3 SD); (iii) with chronic metabolic diseases (e.g. rheumatologic diseases, blood diseases and kidney diseases); (iv) with a recent acute illness; (v) professional athlete. Finally, a total of 10 818 individuals (5509 boys and 5309 girls) were included for data analysis. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Capital Institute of Pediatrics. The written informed consents were obtained from the participants and/or their parents.

Data collection

Weight and height were measured to the nearest 0.1 kg and 0.1 cm, respectively, in lightweight clothing without shoes in a calibrated digital scale. Weight and height were measured twice, and the mean values were used to calculate BMI (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared). Whole body DXA scans (Hologic Discovery‐A&W, Bedford, MA, USA) were performed to assess body composition (fat mass, fat free mass and bone mass) according to International Society of Clinical Densitometry's standard operating method.11 Fat mass index (fat mass/height2) and fat free mass index (fat free mass/height2) were calculated. Whole body and four‐limb muscle mass were calculated as fat free mass minus bone mass. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was calculated as the sum of the arms' and the legs' muscle mass, which is a good proxy for whole body skeletal muscle mass.15 To account for the potential influence of body size or height, several muscle mass variables were calculated as below:

Statistical analysis

All data analyses were performed with sas 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Smoothed percentile curves for muscle mass indices including MMI, ASMI, ASMR, ULSMI and LLSMI were constructed in boys and girls separately using the lambda‐mu‐sigma (LMS) method (LMS Chart Maker Pro Version 2.54, Medical Research Council, London, UK), which converted skewed distribution to normal using the maximum likelihood method and adjusted the curves of median (M), the coefficient of variation (S) and the Box–Cox power (L) and smoothed the percentile curves of muscle mass indices by cubic natural smoothing spline functions.16, 17 Percentile curves of muscle mass indices were plotted with Origin Pro 2017. Z values can be calculated by the following equation: where X is the muscle mass indices, L is the power transformation, M is the median value and S is the population SD. Percentiles were obtained from z‐scores, for example, z‐scores of −1.645, −1.282, 0, 1.282 and 1.645 correspond to the 5th, 10th, 50th, 90th and 95th percentiles, respectively.

Results

A total of 10 818 children and adolescents were included in this study, and their characteristics were presented in Table 1. The selected characteristics included height, weight, BMI, fat mass, fat free mass, muscle mass, ULSM, LLSM, fat mass index and fat free mass index. Overall, all values of these variables increased with age for both sexes, except that fat mass index increased before age 10 years and then showed a decreasing trend thereafter. Boys vs. girls had higher mean values of BMI, fat free mass, fat free mass index, muscle mass but lower mean values of fat mass and fat mass index at each age.
Table 1

Characteristics of study population by sex

Age N HeightWeightBMIFMFFMMuscle MassASMULSMLLSMFMIFFMI
(years)(cm)(kg)(kg/m2)(kg)(kg)(kg)(kg)(kg)(kg)(kg/m2)(kg/m2)
Boys
3129103.0 ± 4.216.4 ± 1.915.4 ± 1.25.4 ± 1.211.5 ± 1.210.9 ± 1.23.6 ± 0.61.0 ± 0.22.5 ± 0.55.0 ± 1.010.8 ± 0.7
4268109.3 ± 5.118.6 ± 2.715.5 ± 1.55.9 ± 1.513.3 ± 1.712.6 ± 1.74.4 ± 0.81.2 ± 0.23.2 ± 0.64.9 ± 1.111.1 ± 0.8
5321115.7 ± 5.021.2 ± 3.915.7 ± 1.96.6 ± 2.315.3 ± 2.014.6 ± 2.05.4 ± 1.01.4 ± 0.24.0 ± 0.84.8 ± 1.411.4 ± 0.9
6409123.0 ± 5.625.1 ± 5.016.5 ± 2.47.6 ± 3.017.6 ± 2.516.8 ± 2.46.6 ± 1.21.6 ± 0.35.0 ± 1.04.9 ± 1.711.6 ± 1.0
7404128.7 ± 6.428.8 ± 6.517.3 ± 2.88.5 ± 3.719.8 ± 3.018.9 ± 2.97.8 ± 1.41.8 ± 0.36.0 ± 1.25.1 ± 1.911.9 ± 1.1
8397133.0 ± 6.761.0 ± 7.117.4 ± 2.79.2 ± 4.221.8 ± 3.320.8 ± 3.28.8 ± 1.62.0 ± 0.36.8 ± 1.35.1 ± 2.012.3 ± 1.1
9332138.7 ± 7.536.2 ± 9.518.6 ± 3.711.7 ± 5.824.5 ± 4.423.5 ± 4.310.2 ± 2.02.2 ± 0.47.9 ± 1.66.0 ± 2.612.7 ± 1.5
10339144.3 ± 7.841.0 ± 11.319.5 ± 3.913.4 ± 6.627.1 ± 5.126.0 ± 5.011.4 ± 2.42.4 ± 0.59.0 ± 1.96.3 ± 2.812.9 ± 1.5
11329149.9 ± 8.245.0 ± 12.019.8 ± 4.014.0 ± 6.930.9 ± 6.229.6 ± 6.013.3 ± 3.02.9 ± 0.710.5 ± 2.46.2 ± 2.813.6 ± 1.8
12358157.1 ± 9.850.9 ± 13.220.4 ± 3.915.0 ± 7.235.6 ± 7.834.1 ± 7.515.6 ± 3.73.4 ± 0.812.3 ± 2.96.0 ± 2.614.2 ± 2.0
13309163.6 ± 8.855.0 ± 13.120.4 ± 3.714.3 ± 6.841.0 ± 7.839.4 ± 7.618.2 ± 3.74.0 ± 0.914.2 ± 2.85.3 ± 2.315.2 ± 1.9
14306168.5 ± 7.961.6 ± 14.921.6 ± 4.415.4 ± 8.046.0 ± 7.844.2 ± 7.520.4 ± 3.74.6 ± 0.815.9 ± 2.95.4 ± 2.716.2 ± 2.1
15453171.1 ± 6.962.5 ± 13.221.3 ± 3.915.1 ± 7.548.0 ± 7.346.0 ± 7.021.2 ± 3.54.8 ± 0.816.4 ± 2.85.1 ± 2.416.3 ± 2.0
16538172.3 ± 6.565.1 ± 13.021.9 ± 3.916.3 ± 8.149.2 ± 7.346.9 ± 7.021.5 ± 3.54.9 ± 0.816.6 ± 2.85.4 ± 2.616.5 ± 2.1
17617173.2 ± 6.567.2 ± 13.822.4 ± 4.116.2 ± 8.150.7 ± 7.648.4 ± 7.322.1 ± 3.65.1 ± 0.817.0 ± 2.95.4 ± 2.616.8 ± 2.1
Girls
3135101.8 ± 3.915.7 ± 1.615.1 ± 1.05.7 ± 1.010.5 ± 1.110.0 ± 1.03.2 ± 0.50.9 ± 0.12.3 ± 0.45.5 ± 0.810.2 ± 0.7
4269107.4 ± 4.717.6 ± 2.515.2 ± 1.36.1 ± 1.512.0 ± 1.511.3 ± 1.53.9 ± 0.71.0 ± 0.22.9 ± 0.65.3 ± 1.110.4 ± 0.7
5251115.0 ± 5.120.3 ± 3.215.3 ± 1.66.8 ± 1.814.0 ± 1.713.3 ± 1.74.9 ± 0.81.2 ± 0.23.7 ± 0.65.1 ± 1.210.6 ± 0.7
6381121.4 ± 5.623.6 ± 4.515.9 ± 2.17.7 ± 2.615.9 ± 2.315.1 ± 2.25.9 ± 1.11.4 ± 0.24.5 ± 0.95.2 ± 1.510.7 ± 0.9
7362126.3 ± 5.825.8 ± 4.616.1 ± 2.18.0 ± 2.717.4 ± 2.216.6 ± 2.26.7 ± 1.11.5 ± 0.25.2 ± 0.95.0 ± 1.510.9 ± 1.0
8331132.4 ± 6.629.7 ± 6.316.8 ± 2.59.4 ± 3.720.0 ± 3.119.0 ± 3.07.9 ± 1.51.7 ± 0.36.2 ± 1.25.3 ± 1.911.4 ± 1.1
9340138.0 ± 7.433.0 ± 7.817.2 ± 2.710.6 ± 4.222.4 ± 3.921.4 ± 3.89.1 ± 1.91.9 ± 0.47.1 ± 1.55.5 ± 1.911.7 ± 1.2
10302144.1 ± 8.536.3 ± 8.217.3 ± 2.611.4 ± 3.925.1 ± 4.723.9 ± 4.610.3 ± 2.22.2 ± 0.58.1 ± 1.75.4 ± 1.612.0 ± 1.5
11290150.8 ± 8.543.9 ± 10.619.1 ± 3.314.0 ± 5.529.9 ± 5.528.6 ± 5.312.5 ± 2.52.6 ± 0.59.8 ± 2.06.1 ± 2.113.1 ± 1.6
12295155.8 ± 7.547.7 ± 10.019.6 ± 3.414.9 ± 5.632.8 ± 5.231.3 ± 5.013.6 ± 2.42.8 ± 0.510.8 ± 2.06.1 ± 2.113.4 ± 1.6
13270158.8 ± 6.450.2 ± 9.819.8 ± 3.216.1 ± 5.634.5 ± 4.932.9 ± 4.714.3 ± 2.32.9 ± 0.511.3 ± 1.96.4 ± 2.113.7 ± 1.5
14301159.9 ± 6.351.8 ± 8.520.2 ± 2.916.8 ± 5.135.4 ± 4.533.7 ± 4.314.5 ± 2.13.0 ± 0.411.5 ± 1.76.5 ± 1.813.8 ± 1.4
15486160.4 ± 5.654.1 ± 9.121.0 ± 3.118.5 ± 5.336.0 ± 4.834.1 ± 4.714.7 ± 2.43.0 ± 0.511.7 ± 1.97.2 ± 1.913.9 ± 1.5
16574160.5 ± 5.754.4 ± 8.821.1 ± 3.019.1 ± 5.535.6 ± 4.633.7 ± 4.414.3 ± 2.23.0 ± 0.511.4 ± 1.87.4 ± 2.013.8 ± 1.4
17722160.6 ± 5.954.3 ± 7.521.0 ± 2.618.4 ± 4.935.8 ± 4.333.9 ± 4.114.3 ± 2.13.0 ± 0.511.3 ± 1.77.1 ± 1.813.8 ± 1.3

Data are means ± standard deviations. ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass; BMI, body mass index; FFM, fat free mass; FFMI, fat free mass index; FM, fat mass; FMI, fat mass index; LLSM, lower limb skeletal muscle mass; ULSM, upper limb skeletal muscle mass.

Characteristics of study population by sex Data are means ± standard deviations. ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass; BMI, body mass index; FFM, fat free mass; FFMI, fat free mass index; FM, fat mass; FMI, fat mass index; LLSM, lower limb skeletal muscle mass; ULSM, upper limb skeletal muscle mass. Tables 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 presented reference values for mean, mean ± 1 SD and mean ± 2 SD, as well as the 3th, 10th, 25th, 75th, 90th and 97th percentiles for all muscle mass indices at each age for boys and girls. Figures 1 and 2 presented the smoothed LMS curves for mean, mean ± 1 SD and mean ± 2 SD for all muscle mass indices for both boys and girls. Overall, boys vs. girls had consistently higher values of all these indices at each given age.
Table 2

Reference values of MMI (kg/m2) among Chinese children and adolescents

Age (years)LSMean ‐ 2 SDMean ‐ SDMeanMean + SDMean + 2 SDPercentiles
P3P10P25P75P90P97
Boys
3−0.5530.0599.059.5710.1510.7811.479.119.429.7510.5610.9711.38
4−0.5530.0659.139.7110.3511.0611.859.209.559.9210.8211.2711.75
5−0.5530.0739.259.9110.6411.4612.399.329.7110.1411.1811.7112.27
6−0.5530.0819.3310.0610.8911.8312.899.419.8510.3211.5112.1112.76
7−0.5530.0889.4210.2311.1412.2013.419.519.9910.5111.8412.5213.26
8−0.5530.0969.5410.4311.4412.6214.009.6410.1610.7412.2212.9913.83
9−0.5530.1039.6810.6511.7713.0914.669.7910.3610.9912.6413.5114.46
10−0.5530.1119.8710.9212.1613.6315.399.9910.6111.3013.1214.0915.17
11−0.5530.11710.1711.3112.6714.2916.2610.3010.9711.7313.7314.8116.01
12−0.5530.12110.6011.8313.3015.0817.2510.7411.4612.2814.4615.6516.97
13−0.5530.12311.1212.4414.0115.9218.2611.2712.0412.9215.2616.5317.96
14−0.5530.12311.6513.0314.6816.6819.1411.8012.6213.5315.9917.3218.82
15−0.5530.12212.0913.5015.1917.2419.7512.2413.0814.0216.5317.9019.43
16−0.5530.12012.3913.8215.5317.5820.0912.5513.4014.3416.8718.2319.76
17−0.5530.11812.6314.0515.7517.7820.2612.7813.6314.5717.0818.4319.94
Girls
3−0.3870.0628.438.959.5210.1310.808.498.809.139.9210.3110.72
4−0.3870.0668.479.039.6410.3111.048.548.879.2210.0810.5110.95
5−0.3870.0738.539.159.8410.6011.448.608.979.3710.3410.8311.34
6−0.3870.0808.599.2810.0410.8911.858.679.089.5210.6111.1511.73
7−0.3870.0878.689.4310.2711.2212.308.769.219.6910.9011.5112.16
8−0.3870.0938.839.6510.5711.6212.838.929.419.9311.2711.9512.68
9−0.3870.0999.059.9410.9512.1113.459.159.6810.2511.7112.4713.28
10−0.3870.1039.3410.2911.3912.6514.129.4410.0110.6312.2213.0413.94
11−0.3870.1069.6710.6911.8613.2214.819.7810.3811.0512.7613.6414.61
12−0.3870.10810.0011.0712.3013.7415.4110.1210.7511.4513.2514.1815.20
13−0.3870.10810.2811.3812.6514.1315.8610.4011.0511.7713.6214.5915.64
14−0.3870.10710.4911.6012.8814.3716.1110.6111.2712.0013.8614.8415.89
15−0.3870.10510.6211.7313.0014.4816.2010.7511.4012.1313.9814.9415.98
16−0.3870.10310.7011.7913.0414.4816.1610.8211.4712.1813.9914.9315.94
17−0.3870.10010.7611.8313.0414.4516.0610.8811.5112.2013.9714.8815.86

MMI, muscle mass index; L, lambda; S, coefficient of variation; SD, standard deviation.

Table 3

Reference values of ASMI (kg/m2) among Chinese children and adolescents

Age (years)LSMean ‐ 2 SDMean ‐ SDMeanMean + SDMean + 2 SDPercentiles
P3P10P25P75P90P97
Boys
3−0.0640.1172.532.843.193.594.052.572.752.953.463.723.99
4−0.0640.1172.753.083.463.904.382.792.983.203.754.034.32
5−0.0640.1163.053.423.844.314.853.093.313.554.154.464.78
6−0.0640.1163.323.734.184.705.283.373.613.874.524.865.21
7−0.0640.1173.563.994.495.055.683.613.874.154.865.225.60
8−0.0640.1203.764.234.775.386.083.814.104.405.185.575.99
9−0.0640.1253.944.465.055.726.494.004.304.645.495.936.39
10−0.0640.1304.124.685.336.086.934.184.524.885.826.316.82
11−0.0640.1354.344.955.676.497.444.404.775.176.216.747.32
12−0.0640.1384.605.276.056.958.004.685.075.516.657.237.87
13−0.0640.1394.895.616.457.428.544.975.405.877.097.728.40
14−0.0640.1385.165.926.797.818.985.255.696.197.468.128.83
15−0.0640.1365.376.147.038.069.265.455.916.427.718.389.11
16−0.0640.1345.496.267.168.189.375.586.046.547.838.509.22
17−0.0640.1315.576.347.228.239.405.666.116.617.898.549.25
Girls
3−0.1610.1062.462.733.033.383.772.492.652.833.263.483.72
4−0.1610.1082.602.893.213.594.012.632.802.993.463.703.96
5−0.1610.1122.823.143.513.934.412.853.053.263.794.064.35
6−0.1610.1153.023.383.794.264.793.063.273.514.104.404.72
7−0.1610.1193.223.614.064.575.173.263.493.754.404.735.09
8−0.1610.1223.413.844.334.895.553.463.713.994.705.075.46
9−0.1610.1253.604.074.605.225.943.663.934.235.015.415.85
10−0.1610.1273.804.304.875.546.323.864.154.485.315.756.22
11−0.1610.1293.994.525.135.846.674.054.364.715.606.076.57
12−0.1610.1294.154.705.346.096.964.214.544.905.836.326.85
13−0.1610.1294.264.835.496.257.144.334.665.035.996.497.03
14−0.1610.1284.334.905.566.337.224.404.735.116.076.567.10
15−0.1610.1264.364.935.586.337.214.424.765.136.086.577.10
16−0.1610.1234.364.925.566.297.144.434.755.126.046.527.04
17−0.1610.1204.364.905.526.237.054.424.745.095.996.456.95

ASMI, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index; L, lambda; S, coefficient of variation; SD, standard deviation.

Table 4

Reference values of ASMR among Chinese children and adolescents

Age (years)LSMean ‐ 2 SDMean ‐ SDMeanMean + SDMean + 2 SDPercentiles
P3P10P25P75P90P97
Boys
31.4550.09616.7718.9320.9822.9424.8317.0318.3319.6122.3123.4824.61
41.3980.09818.0520.4222.6824.8626.9618.3419.7621.1724.1625.4626.72
51.3180.10119.6622.3124.8727.3529.7519.9821.5823.1626.5528.0329.47
61.2430.10520.6423.5226.3229.0531.7220.9822.7224.4428.1729.8131.41
71.1710.1121.1424.2227.2430.233.1121.5123.3625.2129.2431.0332.77
81.1130.11521.5524.8328.0831.2934.4521.9423.9125.930.2532.1834.07
91.0870.11921.6625.1128.5431.9335.2822.0724.1426.2330.8232.8734.88
101.1130.12221.6325.2328.7832.2835.7322.0624.2226.3931.1433.2535.32
111.2080.12322.0425.8429.5333.1336.6422.524.7827.0531.9734.1336.23
121.380.12222.9727.0330.8834.5638.0923.4625.9128.3133.3835.5737.68
131.6260.11724.1828.5132.4636.1439.5924.7227.3329.8334.9737.1339.19
141.9320.1125.2429.7233.6537.1940.4425.8128.5331.0536.0738.1340.07
152.2740.10325.8530.3234.0837.3740.3226.4329.1531.636.3438.2339.99
162.6290.09526.0430.3733.8836.8839.5226.6129.2531.5835.9537.6539.22
172.9860.08826.0330.1733.4236.1438.526.5929.1231.335.336.8338.24
Girls
30.4630.10716.2618.2520.3822.6325.0116.4917.6818.9321.8923.2924.72
40.4630.10817.119.221.4523.8226.3317.3418.619.9223.0324.5126.02
50.4630.10818.4320.7123.1425.7128.4218.720.0621.4924.8526.4628.09
60.4630.10819.5621.9824.5627.330.1819.8421.2822.826.3928.0929.83
70.4630.10820.4622.9925.728.5631.5820.7522.2623.8627.6129.3931.22
80.4630.10821.2223.8526.6529.6132.7421.5223.0924.7428.6330.4832.36
90.4630.10721.9124.627.4730.5133.7222.2223.8325.5229.531.433.33
100.4630.10622.5225.2428.1531.2234.4622.8324.4626.1730.232.1134.07
110.4630.10422.9725.6928.5831.6434.8623.2824.9126.6230.6232.5334.47
120.4630.10123.2325.8928.7231.7134.8523.5325.1326.830.7232.5834.47
130.4630.09823.2925.8628.5831.4534.4723.5825.1226.7330.532.2934.1
140.4630.09423.1425.5928.1730.933.7523.4224.8826.423031.6933.4
150.4630.09122.825.1127.5430.132.7823.0624.4425.8929.2530.8432.45
160.4630.08722.3924.5726.8629.2631.7622.6523.9525.328.4629.9531.46
170.4630.08422.0424.0926.2528.530.8522.2823.524.7827.7629.1530.57

ASMR, appendicular skeletal muscle mass weight ratio; L, lambda; S, coefficient of variation; SD, standard deviation.

Table 5

Reference values of ULSMI (kg/m2) among Chinese children and adolescents

Age (years)LSMean ‐ 2 SDMean ‐ SDMeanMean + SDMean + 2 SDPercentiles
P3P10P25P75P90P97
Boys
30.2850.1120.740.840.941.051.160.750.810.871.011.081.15
40.2850.1120.770.870.971.081.210.780.840.901.051.121.19
50.2850.1120.810.911.011.131.260.820.880.941.091.171.24
60.2850.1120.830.931.041.171.300.840.900.971.121.201.28
70.2850.1140.840.951.061.191.330.850.920.981.151.231.31
80.2850.1180.850.971.091.221.370.870.931.011.181.261.35
90.2850.1240.860.981.121.261.420.880.951.031.211.301.40
100.2850.1310.871.001.151.301.480.890.971.051.251.351.45
110.2850.1370.911.051.211.381.570.921.011.101.321.431.55
120.2850.1430.961.121.301.491.710.981.071.181.431.551.68
130.2850.1461.041.211.411.621.861.061.161.271.551.691.83
140.2850.1471.111.301.511.752.011.141.251.371.671.821.97
150.2850.1451.181.371.591.842.111.201.321.441.761.912.07
160.2850.1431.221.421.641.892.161.241.361.491.811.962.13
170.2850.1411.251.451.671.922.191.271.391.521.841.992.16
Girls
30.1380.1090.690.770.860.961.070.700.750.800.930.991.05
40.1380.1100.690.770.860.961.070.700.750.800.930.991.06
50.1380.1120.690.780.870.971.090.700.750.810.941.001.07
60.1380.1160.700.790.891.001.120.710.760.820.961.031.10
70.1380.1200.710.800.911.021.150.720.780.840.981.061.13
80.1380.1240.720.820.931.051.180.730.790.851.011.091.17
90.1380.1270.740.840.961.091.230.750.810.881.041.121.21
100.1380.1310.760.870.991.131.280.770.840.911.081.171.26
110.1380.1330.790.901.041.181.350.800.870.951.131.231.32
120.1380.1350.820.941.081.231.410.830.900.981.181.281.39
130.1380.1370.840.971.121.281.460.860.931.021.221.331.44
140.1380.1370.860.991.141.301.490.880.951.041.251.361.47
150.1380.1380.871.001.151.321.510.880.961.051.261.371.48
160.1380.1380.871.001.151.321.510.880.961.051.261.371.48
170.1380.1380.871.001.151.311.500.880.961.041.261.361.48

L, lambda; S, coefficient of variation; SD, standard deviation; ULSMI, upper limb skeletal muscle index.

Table 6

Reference values of LLSMI (kg/m2) among Chinese children and adolescents

Age (years)LSMean ‐ 2 SDMean ‐ SDMeanMean + SDMean + 2 SDPercentiles
P3P10P25P75P90P97
Boys
3−0.0500.1351.721.962.252.572.941.751.892.052.462.672.90
4−0.0500.1321.912.182.492.843.251.942.102.272.722.953.20
5−0.0500.1292.182.482.823.223.662.222.392.593.083.343.61
6−0.0500.1272.442.763.143.564.052.472.672.883.423.703.99
7−0.0500.1262.663.023.423.894.422.702.913.143.734.034.35
8−0.0500.1282.863.243.684.194.772.903.133.384.024.354.70
9−0.0500.1323.023.453.934.485.123.073.323.604.304.665.04
10−0.0500.1363.193.654.184.795.493.243.513.814.584.985.41
11−0.0500.1403.373.874.455.125.903.423.724.054.895.335.80
12−0.0500.1423.584.124.755.476.323.643.964.315.225.706.21
13−0.0500.1423.804.375.045.816.713.864.204.585.556.056.60
14−0.0500.1413.994.595.286.097.024.064.414.815.816.346.90
15−0.0500.1394.134.745.446.267.204.204.564.965.986.517.08
16−0.0500.1364.214.825.526.337.264.284.645.036.056.587.15
17−0.0500.1344.254.855.556.347.264.324.685.076.076.597.15
Girls
3−0.0900.1231.671.892.132.412.731.701.821.962.322.502.69
4−0.0900.1241.822.052.322.632.981.851.982.142.532.722.94
5−0.0900.1242.062.322.632.983.382.092.242.422.863.093.33
6−0.0900.1262.262.552.893.283.732.292.472.663.153.403.67
7−0.0900.1272.432.753.123.554.042.472.662.873.403.683.97
8−0.0900.1282.602.953.353.814.342.642.853.073.653.954.28
9−0.0900.1302.783.153.594.094.672.823.043.293.924.244.59
10−0.0900.1312.953.363.834.364.993.003.243.504.184.534.91
11−0.0900.1323.133.574.074.655.313.183.443.724.454.835.23
12−0.0900.1323.293.754.274.885.583.343.613.914.675.075.50
13−0.0900.1313.393.864.405.025.733.443.724.024.805.215.64
14−0.0900.1303.443.914.455.075.783.493.774.074.855.265.69
15−0.0900.1283.453.914.445.055.753.503.784.084.855.245.67
16−0.0900.1253.443.894.404.995.673.493.754.054.795.175.58
17−0.0900.1223.423.864.354.925.573.473.734.014.735.105.49

LLSMI, lower limb skeletal muscle mass index; L, lambda; S, coefficient of variation; SD, standard deviation.

Figure 1

Reference curves of MMI, ASMI and ASMR among Chinese children and adolescents. Red area: mean ‐ 2 SD to mean ‐ SD; yellow area: mean ‐ SD to mean; cyan area: mean to mean + SD; green area: mean + SD to mean + 2 SD. ASMI, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index; ASMR, appendicular skeletal muscle mass weight ratio; MMI, muscle mass index; SD, standard deviation.

Figure 2

Reference curves of ULSMI and LLSMI among Chinese children and adolescents. Red area: mean‐2 SD to mean‐SD; yellow area: mean‐SD to mean; cyan area: mean to mean + SD; green area: mean + SD to mean + 2 SD. LLSMI, lower limb skeletal muscle mass index; SD, standard deviation. ULSMI, upper limb skeletal muscle index.

Reference values of MMI (kg/m2) among Chinese children and adolescents MMI, muscle mass index; L, lambda; S, coefficient of variation; SD, standard deviation. Reference values of ASMI (kg/m2) among Chinese children and adolescents ASMI, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index; L, lambda; S, coefficient of variation; SD, standard deviation. Reference values of ASMR among Chinese children and adolescents ASMR, appendicular skeletal muscle mass weight ratio; L, lambda; S, coefficient of variation; SD, standard deviation. Reference values of ULSMI (kg/m2) among Chinese children and adolescents L, lambda; S, coefficient of variation; SD, standard deviation; ULSMI, upper limb skeletal muscle index. Reference values of LLSMI (kg/m2) among Chinese children and adolescents LLSMI, lower limb skeletal muscle mass index; L, lambda; S, coefficient of variation; SD, standard deviation. Reference curves of MMI, ASMI and ASMR among Chinese children and adolescents. Red area: mean ‐ 2 SD to mean ‐ SD; yellow area: mean ‐ SD to mean; cyan area: mean to mean + SD; green area: mean + SD to mean + 2 SD. ASMI, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index; ASMR, appendicular skeletal muscle mass weight ratio; MMI, muscle mass index; SD, standard deviation. Reference curves of ULSMI and LLSMI among Chinese children and adolescents. Red area: mean‐2 SD to mean‐SD; yellow area: mean‐SD to mean; cyan area: mean to mean + SD; green area: mean + SD to mean + 2 SD. LLSMI, lower limb skeletal muscle mass index; SD, standard deviation. ULSMI, upper limb skeletal muscle index. Muscle mass index showed an increasing trend with age for both boys and girls. For boys, MMI increased slightly before age 9 years and then increased rapidly until 15 years and slowed down thereafter. For girls, MMI increased slightly before age 8 years, increased rapidly until 14 years and remained stable thereafter. The trend of ASMI increased rapidly until age 16 years and then increased slightly for boys; by contrast, for girls, ASMI increased consistently before age 14 years but showed a slightly decreasing trend after that. LLSMI showed similar trend with ASMI for both boys and girls. For ULSMI, boys had higher values than girls, and the gap between sexes became wider with increasing age. For boys, ULSMI increased slightly before age 10 years, then increased dramatically until 14 years and increased slowly again thereafter. For girls, ULSMI increased slightly before age 9 years, and then increased at a greater rate until 13 years, but stopped increasing thereafter. For ASMR, boys and girls showed different increasing trend patterns. In boys, ASMR showed a slightly increasing trend from age 3 years to age 10 years, but then increased more rapidly until 14 years. However, after age 14 years, ASMR showed a slight decreasing trend. In contrast, in girls, ASMR increased rapidly from age 3 years to age 12 years but showed a moderate decrease during age 12–17 years.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to develop sex‐specific and age‐specific percentile reference values for muscle mass indices for Chinese children and adolescents aged 3–17 years using LMS method. These reference values can be potentially used for assessing the growth and development of skeletal muscle in Chinese children and adolescents in epidemiological and clinical settings. It is well documented that skeletal muscle has many physiological functions through biomechanical stress and multiple myokines.18 Studies have shown high muscle mass reduces the risk of osteoporosis and contributes to cardiovascular health in adults.19, 20, 21 Maintaining optimal skeletal muscle mass in childhood may improve the peak muscle mass and bone strength and exert beneficial effects on cardiovascular health in adulthood. Therefore, establishing reference values for muscle mass is important for assessing muscle development during early growth. However, few studies have established the growth curve of skeletal muscle mass in children and adolescents. One prior study of 1985 Caucasian children aged 5–18.8 years created sex‐specific reference curves for fat free mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass measured using bioelectrical impedance. Another study of 1919 Korean children and adolescents aged 10–18 years established the reference values for DXA measured skeletal muscle mass. However, these reference values may be inapplicable for Chinese youths due to potential ethnicity disparity in muscle development. Compared with Korean boys, Chinese boys had similar BMI levels but lower ASMI. This difference might be explained by variation in genetics, economic status and diet habits. In addition, we found sex differences in growth patterns in skeletal muscle mass for Chinese children and adolescents. Although muscle mass indices increase rapidly during puberty for both sexes, boys vs. girls had a more rapid increase, especially for ASMI and ULSMI. This sex difference may be related to the different levels of hormone. The reference values of skeletal muscle for Chinese children and adolescents can be used to assess the growth and development of skeletal muscle in healthy children and to monitor the loss of skeletal muscle in patients with some metabolic diseases, for example, severe malnutrition, wasting diseases and epilepsy. These reference data can also be used to evaluate the health risk and treatment effects in participants with bone‐related diseases. In the elderly, the definition of sarcopenia is inconsistent. For example, Rosetta Study defined sarcopenia as SMI below mean minus 2 SD.22 Another two studies defined sarcopenia based on sex‐specific lowest 20% of study group.23, 24 Given great variation in the muscle mass during growth and development, we used sex‐specific and age‐specific percentile values to evaluate healthy and abnormal skeletal muscle mass in the present study. Refer to the definition method for reference values of bone mineral density, skeletal muscle indices at ranges of mean to mean + SD and mean + SD to mean + 2 SD were defined as ‘good’ and ‘excellent’, respectively. Skeletal muscle indices at the range of mean ‐ SD to mean and mean ‐ 2 SD to mean ‐ SD were defined as ‘insufficient’ and ‘severe’. The findings from the Physical Fitness and Health Research of Chinese school students from 1985 to 2010 showed that the trends in ULSMI and LLSMI were consistent with that of grip strength and distance of standing long jump. These findings indicated that physical activity may play a vital role in the development of skeletal muscle in youth. Therefore, children and adolescents are encouraged to engage in adequate physical activity. Our study has several strengths. First, this study had a relatively large sample size of more than 10 000 Chinese children and adolescents. Secondly, DXA as the golden standard technology for assessment of skeletal muscle was applied in this study. Finally, the LMS curve smoothing method was used in this study to obtain growth curves at several specific percentiles. However, one limitation in the present study is that our study participants were from Chinese urban areas, and future studies involving rural children and adolescents are needed to reflect the whole spectrum of the youth population. In conclusion, this study established sex‐specific and age‐specific percentile reference values for skeletal muscle mass for Chinese children and adolescents aged 3–17 years. These reference values may be an important tool for assessing muscle development and monitoring muscle‐related diseases for Chinese youth.

Conflict of interest

None declared.
  25 in total

Review 1.  The "muscle-bone unit" in children and adolescents.

Authors:  E Schoenau; H M Frost
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Total-body skeletal muscle mass: estimation by a new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method.

Authors:  Jaehee Kim; ZiMian Wang; Steven B Heymsfield; Richard N Baumgartner; Dympna Gallagher
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Operational definitions of sarcopenia and their associations with 5-year changes in falls risk in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults.

Authors:  D Scott; A Hayes; K M Sanders; D Aitken; P R Ebeling; G Jones
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Low-dose growth hormone treatment combined with diet restriction decreases insulin resistance by reducing visceral fat and increasing muscle mass in obese type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  S Y Nam; K R Kim; B S Cha; Y D Song; S K Lim; H C Lee; K B Huh
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2001-08

5.  Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia.

Authors:  Roger A Fielding; Bruno Vellas; William J Evans; Shalender Bhasin; John E Morley; Anne B Newman; Gabor Abellan van Kan; Sandrine Andrieu; Juergen Bauer; Denis Breuille; Tommy Cederholm; Julie Chandler; Capucine De Meynard; Lorenzo Donini; Tamara Harris; Aimo Kannt; Florence Keime Guibert; Graziano Onder; Dimitris Papanicolaou; Yves Rolland; Daniel Rooks; Cornel Sieber; Elisabeth Souhami; Sjors Verlaan; Mauro Zamboni
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  Low muscle fitness is associated with metabolic risk in youth.

Authors:  Jostein Steene-Johannessen; Sigmund A Anderssen; Elin Kolle; Lars B Andersen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Alternative definitions of sarcopenia, lower extremity performance, and functional impairment with aging in older men and women.

Authors:  Matthew J Delmonico; Tamara B Harris; Jung-Sun Lee; Marjolein Visser; Michael Nevitt; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Frances A Tylavsky; Anne B Newman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 8.  The developmental origins of sarcopenia.

Authors:  A A Sayer; H Syddall; H Martin; H Patel; D Baylis; C Cooper
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2008 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.075

9.  Muscular strength and cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with higher insulin sensitivity in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Amanda C Benson; Margaret E Torode; Maria A Fiatarone Singh
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Obes       Date:  2006

10.  Diagnostic measures for sarcopenia and bone mineral density.

Authors:  A Y Bijlsma; M C G Meskers; M Molendijk; R G J Westendorp; S Sipilä; L Stenroth; E Sillanpää; J S McPhee; D A Jones; M Narici; H Gapeyeva; M Pääsuke; E Seppet; T Voit; Y Barnouin; J Y Hogrel; G Butler-Browne; A B Maier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  15 in total

1.  Validity and accuracy of body fat prediction equations using anthropometrics measurements in adolescents.

Authors:  Wagner L Ripka; Camila E Orsso; Andrea M Haqq; Carla M Prado; Leandra Ulbricht; Neiva Leite
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Quantification of chemotherapy-induced changes in body composition in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult lymphoma using standard of care CT imaging.

Authors:  Nguyen K Tram; Ting-Heng Chou; Laila N Ettefagh; Kyra Deep; Adam J Bobbey; Anthony N Audino; Mitchel R Stacy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 7.034

3.  Early Life Factors Associated with Lean Body Mass in Spanish Children: CALINA Study.

Authors:  Diana Paola Córdoba-Rodríguez; Iris Iglesia; Alejandro Gómez-Bruton; María Luisa Álvarez Sauras; María L Miguel-Berges; Paloma Flores-Barrantes; José Antonio Casajús; Luis A Moreno; Gerardo Rodríguez
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20

4.  Characteristics of Body Composition Estimated by Air-Displacement Plethysmography in Chinese Preschool Children.

Authors:  Fangfang Chen; Jing Wang; Junting Liu; Guimin Huang; Dongqing Hou; Zijun Liao; Ting Zhang; Gongshu Liu; Xianghui Xie; Jun Tai
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 5.  Improvement of Bone Health and Initiation of Puberty Development in Camurati-Engelmann Disease With Glucocorticoid and Losartan Treatment: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Lijia Cui; Qian Li; Wenmin Guan; Wei Yu; Xiang Li; Weibo Xia; Yan Jiang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.055

6.  Relationship between the skeletal muscle mass index and physical activity of Japanese children: A cross-sectional, observational study.

Authors:  Tadashi Ito; Hideshi Sugiura; Yuji Ito; Koji Noritake; Nobuhiko Ochi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Lean mass reference curves in adolescents using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  Wagner Luis Ripka; Camila E Orsso; Andrea M Haqq; Thais Gretis Luz; Carla M Prado; Leandra Ulbricht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Psoas muscle area and paraspinal muscle fat in children and young adults with or without obesity and fatty liver.

Authors:  Salman S Albakheet; Mi-Jung Lee; Haesung Yoon; Hyun Joo Shin; Hong Koh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Decreased Muscle-to-Fat Mass Ratio Is Associated with Low Muscular Fitness and High Alanine Aminotransferase in Children and Adolescent Boys in Organized Sports Clubs.

Authors:  Kai Ushio; Yukio Mikami; Hiromune Obayashi; Hironori Fujishita; Kouki Fukuhara; Tetsuhiko Sakamitsu; Kazuhiko Hirata; Yasunari Ikuta; Hiroaki Kimura; Nobuo Adachi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Body Fat Mass, Percent Body Fat, Fat-Free Mass, and Skeletal Muscle Mass Reference Curves for Czech Children Aged 6-11 Years.

Authors:  Vendula Zbořilová; Miroslava Přidalová; Tereza Kaplanová
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.