Literature DB >> 30499038

Circulating proteins as predictors of cardiovascular mortality in end-stage renal disease.

Tobias Feldreich1,2,3, Christoph Nowak2, Tove Fall3, Axel C Carlsson2,3, Juan-Jesus Carrero4, Jonas Ripsweden5, Abdul Rashid Qureshi6, Olof Heimbürger6, Peter Barany6, Peter Stenvinkel6, Nicolas Vuilleumier7,8, Philip A Kalra9,10, Darren Green9,10, Johan Ärnlöv11,12.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Proteomic profiling of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients could lead to improved risk prediction and novel insights into cardiovascular disease mechanisms. Plasma levels of 92 cardiovascular disease-associated proteins were assessed by proximity extension assay (Proseek Multiplex CVD-1, Olink Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden) in a discovery cohort of dialysis patients, the Mapping of Inflammatory Markers in Chronic Kidney disease cohort [MIMICK; n = 183, 55% women, mean age 63 years, 46 cardiovascular deaths during follow-up (mean 43 months)]. Significant results were replicated in the incident and prevalent hemodialysis arm of the Salford Kidney Study [SKS dialysis study, n = 186, 73% women, mean age 62 years, 45 cardiovascular deaths during follow-up (mean 12 months)], and in the CKD5-LD-RTxcohort with assessments of coronary artery calcium (CAC)-score by cardiac computed tomography (n = 89, 37% women, mean age 46 years).
RESULTS: In age and sex-adjusted Cox regression in MIMICK, 11 plasma proteins were nominally associated with cardiovascular mortality (in order of significance: Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), Matrix metalloproteinase-7, Tumour necrosis factor receptor 2, Interleukin-6, Matrix metalloproteinase-1, Brain-natriuretic peptide, ST2 protein, Hepatocyte growth factor, TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand receptor-2, Spondin-1, and Fibroblast growth factor 25). Only plasma KIM-1 was associated with cardiovascular mortality after correction for multiple testing, but also after adjustment for dialysis vintage, cardiovascular risk factors and inflammation (hazard ratio) per standard deviation (SD) increase 1.84, 95% CI 1.26-2.69, p = 0.002. Addition of KIM-1, or nine of the most informative proteins to an established risk-score (modified AROii CVM-score) improved discrimination of cardiovascular mortality risk from C = 0.777 to C = 0.799 and C = 0.823, respectively. In the SKS dialysis study, KIM-1 predicted cardiovascular mortality in age and sex adjusted models (hazard ratio per SD increase 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.05, p = 0.034) and higher KIM-1 was associated with higher CACscores in the CKD5-LD-RTx-cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Our proteomics approach identified plasma KIM-1 as a risk marker for cardiovascular mortality and coronary artery calcification in three independent ESRD-cohorts. The improved risk prediction for cardiovascular mortality by plasma proteomics merit further studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CVD; ESRD; Proteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30499038      PMCID: PMC6373380          DOI: 10.1007/s40620-018-0556-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   3.902


Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health problem worldwide [1] determining a significant burden of mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD) being the leading cause of death [2-4]. Irrespective of therapeutic advances and improved care, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have an up to 20-fold increased cardiovascular mortality risk compared to the general population [5]. Many of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as age, sex, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus and smoking do not appear to adequately explain the high cardiovascular risk in ESRD patients. As a consequence, managing ESRD-related CVD with standard clinical interventions is deemed suboptimal [6, 7]. Instead, non-traditional risk factors (such as mineral metabolism abnormalities, uremic toxins, and inflammation) contribute to cardiovascular pathology in ESRD [7-10], but little is known about which factors in the vascular milieu of hemodialysis patients are most important. Recent years have witnessed unprecedented developments in the field of proteomics and process-specific biomarker panels for renal diseases [11-16]—techniques that could offer vital diagnostic and prognostic information as well as novel insights into mechanisms leading to CVD. Our objective was to investigate the association between 92 cardiovascular proteins measured in plasma by a novel proteomics assay and the risk of cardiovascular mortality in prevalent hemodialysis patients, and to replicate the findings in an independent hemodialysis cohort. Furthermore we also wanted to assess whether plasma proteomics could improve the prediction of cardiovascular mortality beyond established risk factors. In order to provide additional mechanistic insights, a secondary aim was to use an independent cohort of CKD-stage 5 patients undergoing living donor renal transplantation (LD-RTx) with detailed data on cardiovascular phenotypes.

Methods

Discovery cohort, MIMICK

For the primary discovery analysis, we used the Mapping of Inflammatory Markers in Chronic Kidney disease study (MIMICK), a longitudinal study cohort consisting of 228 hemodialysis patients from six dialysis units in the Stockholm/Uppsala (Sweden) region. All subjects included had received dialysis treatment for ≥ 3 months, with a median follow-up period of 31 months (interquartile range, IQR 21–38). Survival, censored at transplantation, was determined from the day of examination. The patients were recruited from October 2003 through March 2004 and data on demographics, comorbidities and antihypertensive treatment were obtained by questionnaire or from hospital records. Venous blood samples were collected before the dialysis period, spun down immediately, and stored as EDTA plasma at -70 °C. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was measured by nephelometry. An immunometric assay on an Immulite Analyzer (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Los Angeles, CA, USA) was used to quantify interleukin (IL)-6 in serum. Pentraxin 3 (PTX3) was determined by an ELISA kit (Perseus Proteomics, Tokyo, Japan). Routine biochemistry was performed in all of the six dialysis laboratory departments in the Stockholm/Uppsala region. In the current analysis, sufficient plasma samples for proteomics analysis were available for 183 of the patients. A detailed description of the study cohort has been previously reported [17, 18].

Replication cohort, SKS dialysis study

As replication, we used the incident and prevalent hemodialysis arm of the Salford Kidney Study (SKS dialysis study), consisting of hemodialysis patients under the care of Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom. All patients received standard-hours, thrice weekly maintenance hemodialysis at Salford Royal Hospital or one of its satellite centers. The patients were enrolled between March 2012 and March 2014 with their written informed consent. Local ethical approval was granted (UK REC 05/Q1404/187), and the study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. The baseline clinical phenotype including demographic data, comorbidities, medications, and dialysis records was obtained from electronic patient medical records and patient self-reported questionnaires. Blood samples were drawn from the dialysis circuit immediately before commencement of a dialysis session. Standard clinical tests were performed immediately and additional samples centrifuged and plasma and serum stored at − 80 °C. Such latter samples were used for KIM-1 analyses which were measured on citrated plasma by electrochemiluminescence, using the MESO QuickPlex SQ 120 automate from Mesoscale Discovery Systems (Rockville, MD, USA). A more detailed description of the cohort has been reported elsewhere [19].

Secondary analyses, CKD5 patients undergoing living donor renal transplantation (LD-RTx)

For further pathophysiologic insight, we used a cross-sectional study consisting of 89 adult CKD5-LD-RTx at the Department of Transplantation Surgery at Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden. A comprehensive description of the study is available elsewhere [20]. Briefly, the median age was 46 years (range 24–62) and 37% were women. Pharmacological treatment, and previously diagnosed CVD was recorded. Out of the 89 participants, 39% were in pre-dialysis phase and 61% underwent either hemo- or peritoneal dialysis before RTx. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans were performed using a 64-channel detector scanner (LightSpeed VCT; General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) in cine mode. Calcium deposits in the coronary arteries (portraying both intima and media) were identified by an experienced radiologist [20]. An Advantage Workstation 4.4 (GE Healthcare) was used to process and analyze data, and Smartscore 4.0 (GE Healthcare) software was used to assess coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores. Values crossing the standard threshold of 130 Hounsfield units were considered indicative of calcified plaques. CAC scores were expressed in Agatston units (AU), and total CAC score was calculated as the sum of the CAC scores in the left main artery, left circumflex artery, right coronary artery, and the left anterior descending artery. Informed consent was obtained from all patients involved, and the Regional Ethics Committee of the Karolinska Institute at the Karolinska University Hospital approved both study protocols.

Proteomics

The Olink Proseek® Multiplex Cardiovascular I96X96 kit (http://www.olink.com/) is a proximity extension assay (PEA) that measures the relative abundance of 92 cardiovascular proteins. For each protein, oligonucleotide-labeled antibody pairs bind to their specific epitopes on the protein surface [21, 22]. The complementary oligonucleotide sequences then give rise to DNA reporter sequences each barcoding their respective antigens. Using a Fluidigm Biomark™ HD real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) platform, we then quantified these amplicons. Mean intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation are 8 and 12%, respectively, with a reported inter-site variation of 15% [22]. Log2-scaled normalized protein expression values were adjusted by a negative control sample. Higher expression values correspond to higher protein levels, but are not an absolute quantification of protein concentrations.

Outcome definition

In the MIMICK cohort, the patients were followed from the inclusion date until renal transplantation or death or completion of 60 months of follow-up. Causes of death were established by the death certificate issued by the attending physician. Cardiovascular mortality was defined according to International Classification of Diseases (10th revision) codes I00–I99. Follow-up in the SKS dialysis study was from the date of a study protocol echocardiogram (again between March 2012 and March 2014) until death, transplantation, re-location, or August 10th 2016. Causes of death and events were independently verified by two blinded assessors.

Statistical analysis

Analyses were carried out using STATA 12 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) and R v.3.3.2.

Primary analyses

We used MIMCK-1 to investigate associations between the 92 proteins and cardiovascular mortality in an age and sex-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression (Model A). A p value < 0.00054 (Bonferroni correction 0.05/92 proteins) was considered statistically significant. Protein values were transformed to a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1. We then replicated the significant associations in an independent cohort, SKS dialysis study, of hemodialysis patients using age and sex-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression.

Secondary analyses

For proteins that were significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality in the primary analysis, we performed additional multivariable Cox regression analyses in MIMICK adjusting for the following variables: Age, sex, and dialysis vintage to determine if the associations were independent of general characteristics and time on dialysis. Age, sex, dialysis vintage, CVD, and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to determine if the associations were independent of prevalent CVD and heart dysfunction. Age, sex, dialysis vintage, CVD, NT-proBNP, and cardiovascular risk factors—diabetes mellitus (DM), body mass index (BMI), high density lipoproteins (HDL), low density lipoproteins (LDL), and smoking—to determine if the associations were independent of established cardiovascular risk factors measured in clinical practice. Age, sex, dialysis vintage, CVD, NT-proBNP, cardiovascular risk factors (DM, BMI, HDL, LDL, and smoking), and inflammatory markers (hsCRP, IL-6, and PTX3) to determine if the associations were independent of all factors above and significant markers of inflammation. In these analyses, a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In the CKD5-LD-RTx cohort, we also performed cross-sectional analyses between the significant proteins from the discovery replication analyses and coronary artery calcification by calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient and applying linear regression adjusted for age and sex. In these analyses, coronary artery calcification was included as a categorical variable (CAC < 400, CAC 400–1000 and CAC > 1000 Hounsfield units).

Risk prediction

To assess whether adding the proteomics data to an established risk score can improve the prediction of cardiovascular mortality, we used Lasso penalized Cox proportional hazards regression [23] to select a parsimonious model that maximized discrimination performance whilst minimizing the number of proteins used for prediction. We used a modified version of the AROii CVM-score [24] (http://aro-score.askimed.com/) as our base model. The variables available in our dataset that were also included in the ARO risk score were: age, sex, history of CVD, DM, BMI, CRP, smoking status, hemoglobin, ferritin, serum albumin, serum calcium, serum creatinine, history of malignancy and cause of renal disease (diabetes, glomerulonephritis or other). The remaining variables in the ARO risk score (dialysis-related variables) had not been retrieved in the majority of participants and could not be included. However, even though the AROii CVM-score performs best when all components of the score are included, its use is encouraged even in cases where some variables are missing [24]. We forced all available ARO risk score variables into the model and implemented Lasso selection with 10-fold cross-validation and default parameters with the cv.glmnet function in the R package glmnet. The sample was randomly split into a 60% training set and 40% validation set. The Lasso model was trained in the training set and all proteins there were included in the iteration that converged on the smallest cross-validated error were selected and tested in the separate 40% validation sample. Harrell’s C-index in the validation sample was calculated with the survConcordance function and stored. We repeated this procedure in 1000 random iterations and retained the top 50% of models ranked by C-index. The number of times each protein was included in the predictor selection was plotted in histograms to identify cut-off frequencies between top predictors and less important predictors; the more often a protein was selected by one of these top-performing models, the higher was its presumed importance for predicting the outcome. Finally, we implemented a Cox regression model in the total sample with the final set of top predictors added to the risk score variables to assess prediction performance (C-index) and goodness-of-fit (log-likelihood test). The prediction analyses were performed in the MIMICK cohort only.

Results

Baseline characteristics

A summary of general characteristics of the MIMICK, SKS dialysis study and CKD5-LD-RTx cohorts is presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients from the different cohorts

VariableMIMICK-cohortSKS dialysis studyESRD-RT-cohort
N18318689
Sex (% female)557337
Age (years)63 ± 1462 ± 1446 ± 14
BMI (kg/m2)25 ± 5.028 ± 6.225 ± 2.0
Dialysis vintage, months44 ± 4931 ± 3.51.1 ± 1.8
hsCRP (mg/l)6.4 (2.6–22)18 ± 390.8 (0.4–2.4)
IL-6 (pg/ml)8.9 (5.0–15)N.A.1.1 (0.5–2.1)
PTX3 (ng/ml)10 (7.1–17)N.A.3.9 (2.0–6.4)
HDL (mmol/l)1.4 ± 0.5N.A.1.4 ± 0.5
LDL (mmol/l)2.6 ± 0.92.0 ± 1.12.5 ± 0.95
Hemoglobin (g/l)118 ± 13N.A.115 ± 14
Ferritin (µg/l)485 ± 361550 ± 354N.A.
Serum albumin (g/l)35 ± 539 ± 3.836 ± 3.6
Serum calcium (mmol/l)2.5 ± 0.22.4 ± 0.172.3 ± 0.2
Creatinine (µmol/l)770 ± 211716 ± 254759 ± 237
NT-pro-BNP (pg/l)14 ± 130.4 ± 0.55.2 ± 0.4
Smoking (%)17N.A.46
Diabetes mellitus (%)257114
Cardiovascular disease (%)194218

Normally distributed continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation, skewed continuous variables as median (interquartile range) (25th–75th percentile), and categorical variables as percentage

MIMICK Mapping of Inflammatory Markers in Chronic Kidney disease, SKS dialysis study incident and prevalent hemodialysis arm of the Salford Kidney Study, ESRD end-stage renal disease, hsCRP high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-6 interleukin 6, PTX3 pentraxin 3, NSAID nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme, ASA acetylsalicylic acid, ACEi/ARB angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, HDL high density lipoproteins, LDL low density lipoproteins, N.A. not available

Baseline characteristics of patients from the different cohorts Normally distributed continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation, skewed continuous variables as median (interquartile range) (25th–75th percentile), and categorical variables as percentage MIMICK Mapping of Inflammatory Markers in Chronic Kidney disease, SKS dialysis study incident and prevalent hemodialysis arm of the Salford Kidney Study, ESRD end-stage renal disease, hsCRP high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-6 interleukin 6, PTX3 pentraxin 3, NSAID nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme, ASA acetylsalicylic acid, ACEi/ARB angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, HDL high density lipoproteins, LDL low density lipoproteins, N.A. not available After adjusting for age and sex in the MIMICK cohort, 11 proteins showed nominally significant associations with cardiovascular mortality. In the order of level of significance, these included KIM-1, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7, tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2), IL-6, MMP-1, brain-natriuretic peptide (BNP), suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand receptor-2 (TRAIL-R2), spondin-1, and fibroblast growth factor 25 (FGF25) (Table 2). The association between all 92 proteins and cardiovascular mortality is depicted in supplementary figure 1.
Table 2

Associations between circulating protein markers and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients (MIMICK cohort)

Cardiovascular mortalityAge and sex adjusted
ProteinHR (95% CI)p
Kidney injury molecule-11.80 (1.33–2.44)0.0001
Matrix metalloproteinase-72.54 (1.43–4.52)0.002
Tumour necrosis factor receptor 212.6 (2.19–66.0)0.004
Interleukin 61.56 (1.14–2.15)0.005
Matrix metalloproteinase-11.62 (1.13–2.32)0.008
Brain natriuretic peptide1.62 (1.03–2.33)0.009
Suppression of tumorigenicity 21.63 (1.13–2.35)0.009
Hepatocyte growth factor1.37 (1.05–1.79)0.02
TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 21.87 (1.10–3.18)0.02
Spondin-11.43 (1.05–1.94)0.02
Fibroblast growth factor 253.09 (1.03–9.22)0.04

HR and 95% CI are given for an age and sex adjusted model

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, MIMICK Mapping of Inflammatory Markers in Chronic Kidney disease cohort, TNF tumor necrosis factor

After Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, only plasma kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) was significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, HR, per SD increase, 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33–2.44, p < 0.0001. In the SKS replication cohort, KIM-1 was also significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR per SD increase 1.45, 95% CI 1.03–2.05, p = 0.034). In additional multivariable models in the MIMICK cohort, raised KIM-1 levels were significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality after adjustment for age, sex, dialysis vintage, CVD, NT-proBNP, cardiovascular risk factors (DM, BMI, HDL, LDL, and smoking), and inflammatory markers (hsCRP, IL-6, and PTX3; model A–E, Table 3).
Table 3

Associations between circulating protein marker kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients (MIMICK cohort)

ProteinCardiovascular mortality
KIM-1HR (95% CI)p
Model Aa1.80 (1.33–2.44)0.0001
Model Bb1.75 (1.27–2.42)0.0006
Model Cc2.12 (1.50–3.01)0.00002
Model Dd2.07 (1.42–3.02)0.0001
Model Ee2.12 (1.43–3.16)0.0002

Values are hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) with hemodialysis as dependent variable and the 92 protein markers as independent variables in separate models

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

MIMICK Mapping of Inflammatory Markers in Chronic Kidney disease cohort, CVD cardiovascular disease, NT-proBNP N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, DM diabetes mellitus, BMI body mass index, HDL high density lipoproteins, LDL low density lipoproteins, CRP C-reactive protein, IL-6 interleukin 6, PTX3 pentraxin-related protein

aAdjusted for age and sex

bAdjusted for age, sex, dialysis vintage

cAdjusted for age, sex, dialysis vintage, CVD, and NT-proBNP

dAdjusted for age, sex, dialysis vintage, CVD, NT-proBNP, and cardiovascular risk factors (DM, BMI, HDL, LDL, and smoking)

eAge, sex, dialysis vintage, CVD, NT-proBNP, cardiovascular risk factors (DM, BMI, HDL, LDL, and smoking), CRP, IL-6, and PTX3

Associations between circulating protein markers and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients (MIMICK cohort) HR and 95% CI are given for an age and sex adjusted model p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, MIMICK Mapping of Inflammatory Markers in Chronic Kidney disease cohort, TNF tumor necrosis factor Associations between circulating protein marker kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients (MIMICK cohort) Values are hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) with hemodialysis as dependent variable and the 92 protein markers as independent variables in separate models p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant MIMICK Mapping of Inflammatory Markers in Chronic Kidney disease cohort, CVD cardiovascular disease, NT-proBNP N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, DM diabetes mellitus, BMI body mass index, HDL high density lipoproteins, LDL low density lipoproteins, CRP C-reactive protein, IL-6 interleukin 6, PTX3 pentraxin-related protein aAdjusted for age and sex bAdjusted for age, sex, dialysis vintage cAdjusted for age, sex, dialysis vintage, CVD, and NT-proBNP dAdjusted for age, sex, dialysis vintage, CVD, NT-proBNP, and cardiovascular risk factors (DM, BMI, HDL, LDL, and smoking) eAge, sex, dialysis vintage, CVD, NT-proBNP, cardiovascular risk factors (DM, BMI, HDL, LDL, and smoking), CRP, IL-6, and PTX3 In the mechanistic analyses in the CKD5-LD-RTx-cohort, there was a significant correlation between higher plasma KIM-1 and higher CAC-score (Spearman rho = 0.27, p = 0.008). A significant association was also seen between higher plasma levels of KIM-1 and higher CAC-score when adjusting for age and sex in linear regression (β-coefficient per SD increase in protein abundance 0.11, 95% CI 0.01–0.20, p = 0.03). In the MIMICK cohort, we implemented Lasso penalized regression across 1000 iterations each splitting the total sample into a 60% training set used to build the Lasso model, and a separate 40% validation set used to estimate the C-index. A clear cut-off that selected KIM-1 as the most important protein was apparent in a histogram of how often proteins had been selected by the best-performing 500 models (Fig. 1). Protein KIM-1 was selected by 63 of the top models. A second cut-off for top predictors was apparent (marked in Fig. 1), that selected KIM-1, FGF-23, IL-6, ST-2, MMP-7, BNP, MMP-1, HGF and MMP-3.
Fig. 1

Histogram showing proteins most frequently selected as top predictors by the 500 best-performing Lasso penalized Cox models, e.g. protein KIM-1 was selected by 63 of the top models. The red line indicates the arbitrary cut-off for the prediction models chosen in this study for KIM-1, as well as the next most frequent proteins, FGF-23, IL-6, ST-2, MMP-7, BNP, MMP-1, HGF and MMP-3. Proteins that are not shown in the histogram were not selected by any of the 500 best-performing solutions

Histogram showing proteins most frequently selected as top predictors by the 500 best-performing Lasso penalized Cox models, e.g. protein KIM-1 was selected by 63 of the top models. The red line indicates the arbitrary cut-off for the prediction models chosen in this study for KIM-1, as well as the next most frequent proteins, FGF-23, IL-6, ST-2, MMP-7, BNP, MMP-1, HGF and MMP-3. Proteins that are not shown in the histogram were not selected by any of the 500 best-performing solutions In the total sample, the baseline model (AROii CVM-score) achieved a C-index of 0.777 (95% CI 0.692–0.862). The addition of KIM-1 improved prediction performance to C = 0.799 (95% CI, 0.714–0.884) and led to better model fit (p = 0.0012). Addition of the nine proteins that were nominally associated with CVD mortality to the AROii CVM-score achieved C = 0.823 (95% CI, 0.738–0.909) and a better model fit (p = 4.56 × 10−4).

Discussion

We used a novel targeted proteomics assay to explore associations between 92 cardiovascular disease-related proteins in plasma and cardiovascular mortality in a discovery cohort of prevalent hemodialysis patients. Eleven proteins were associated with cardiovascular death at nominal significance. Only plasma KIM-1—also denoted as T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain (TIM) or Hepatitis A virus cellular receptor 1 (HAVCR-1)—predicted cardiovascular mortality after correction for multiple testing. This association remained statistically significant even after adjustment for age, sex, dialysis vintage, prevalent CVD, NT-proBNP, other cardiovascular risk factors, and various inflammatory markers. We then replicated the significant findings in an independent cohort in which KIM-1 also showed a significant association with cardiovascular mortality after adjusting for sex and age. Furthermore, higher plasma KIM-1 was associated with increased coronary artery calcification in a cross-sectional analysis in an independent cohort of CKD 5/5D patients undergoing living donor renal transplantation. The addition of plasma KIM-1, alone, or of a 9-protein risk score to the modified AROii CVM-score appeared to improve the risk prediction for cardiovascular mortality, but larger studies are needed to draw firm conclusions on the clinical utility. Previous large-scale proteomic efforts in CKD patients are scarce and have primarily utilized urine samples for the proteomics analyses [25-27], with a few exceptions [28]. To a limited degree, small proteomics-based studies have been performed using plasma samples in CKD5 patients [29]. KIM-1, a type I cell membrane glycoprotein initially identified in the African green monkey, has been shown to regulate immune cell responses to infections [30], autoimmune and allergic diseases [31] and antitumor effects [32]. The expression of KIM-1 is highly upregulated in the proximal tubule of the kidney after injury, and urinary levels of KIM-1 have been demonstrated as a promising biomarker in both acute and chronic kidney disease as well as a predictor for cardiovascular outcomes in CKD patients [33-37] and in the general population [38]. However, few studies have evaluated blood-borne KIM-1 as a biomarker. Two previous cross-sectional reports demonstrated elevated plasma KIM-1 levels in both acute and chronic kidney disease patients [39] and higher levels with increasing severity of CKD [40]. In longitudinal analyses, higher plasma KIM-1 was associated with a more rapid decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [40] and a greater risk for ESRD [41]. Importantly, we are not aware of any previous study reporting the association between plasma KIM-1 and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients. The detection of KIM-1 in plasma or urine has been attributed to loss of tubular cell polarity, compromised transepithelial permeability, and cytoskeletal disruption in renal microvascular cells [40]. Several other studies have pointed to an upregulated expression and increased release of KIM-1 in renal tubular cells after injury [36, 42, 43]. The potential expression of KIM-1 in other tissues, such as within the vasculature, needs consideration since all patients in this study had a narrow and very low range of eGFR. Our finding of an association between plasma KIM-1 and coronary artery calcification in the CKD5-LD-RTx-cohort implies that circulating KIM-1 is also a marker for atherosclerotic disease, which might explain the strong independent association with cardiovascular mortality [44]. KIM-1 has been implicated in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway [39] which is involved in the activation of macrophages in kidney injury and fibrosis [45] but also in cardiovascular pathology with both promoting and suppressing effects [46-48]. Whether circulating KIM-1 reflects these pathways remains to be established. Eleven of the 92 proteins showed nominally significant associations with cardiovascular mortality. Although we could not establish causality, possible underlying mechanisms might involve inflammation (IL-6, and ST2), extracellular matrix remodeling (MMP-1 and MMP-7), apoptosis (TRAIL-R2), increased ventricular overload due to hydric retention (NT-proBNP), and cell growth, cell motility, and morphogenetic (HGF) properties [49, 50]. Better discrimination of high risk vs. low risk hemodialysis patients could be of great value in tailoring individualized treatments, in decision-making for transplantation, but also to refine inclusion and exclusion criteria for clinical trials thus enabling more powerful cost-effective designs. For this purpose, a new risk score was recently introduced (the AROii CVM-score) [24]. Even though all components of the AROii CVM-score were not available in the MIMICK-cohort, the modified version of the score performed at least as well in our study as the complete score did in the original article C-statistics of the modified AROii CVM-score in MIMICK were 0.78 compared to 0.72–0.74 for the complete score in the original article [24]. As a clear improvement in C-statistics was seen when adding data on plasma KIM-1 or the nine most informative plasma proteins to the modified AROii CVM-score, our data support the notion that proteomic profiling has potential for improving cardiovascular risk prediction in hemodialysis patients. Yet, these findings should be interpreted with caution as our study was underpowered to detect statistically significant improvements in C-statistics. Strengths of our study include the longitudinal design and the fact that we were able to replicate the association between plasma KIM-1 and relevant cardiovascular phenotypes in independent patient populations. Limitations include the fact that the PEA technique does not allow absolute quantification of the proteins, and so determining cut-off values of the different proteins is less straightforward in a clinical setting. Second, the delay between sampling and analysis may have affected protein levels, but sample collection was undertaken in a consistent fashion and samples stored unthawed at a minimum of − 70 °C, which should keep pre-analytical biases to a minimum. If anything, any such bias would dilute associations. In fact, the associations were identical after adjustments for freezer time (data not shown). Finally, the generalizability of our results may be limited since our study sample predominantly consisted of individuals of particular age groups and European descent. Our proteomics approach identified plasma KIM-1 as a promising prognostic marker that merits further investigation. Our results imply that KIM-1 is generated also in tissue(s) other than the kidney and that it may have a potential pathogenic role in premature vascular ageing processes. Furthermore, our data encourage additional efforts to evaluate the utility of targeted proteomic profiling in routine clinical care of hemodialysis patients. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 KB)
  49 in total

1.  A proteomic analysis of human hemodialysis fluid.

Authors:  Henrik Molina; Jakob Bunkenborg; G Hanumanthu Reddy; Babylakshmi Muthusamy; Paul J Scheel; Akhilesh Pandey
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-02-20       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Effects of oral vitamin C supplementation in hemodialysis patients: a proteomic assessment.

Authors:  Eva M Weissinger; Thao Nguyen-Khoa; Christine Fumeron; Claudine Saltiel; Michael Walden; Thorsten Kaiser; Harald Mischak; Tilman B Drüeke; Bernard Lacour; Ziad A Massy
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  Cellular events mediated by lipopolysaccharide-stimulated toll-like receptor 4. MD-2 is required for activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases and Elk-1.

Authors:  H Yang; D W Young; F Gusovsky; J C Chow
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  The TIM gene family regulates autoimmune and allergic diseases.

Authors:  Jennifer Hartt Meyers; Catherine A Sabatos; Sumone Chakravarti; Vijay K Kuchroo
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.951

Review 5.  Chronic kidney disease: a public health priority and harbinger of premature cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  P Stenvinkel
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Tubular kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) in human renal disease.

Authors:  M M van Timmeren; M C van den Heuvel; V Bailly; S J L Bakker; H van Goor; C A Stegeman
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 7.  Mitogen-activated protein kinases: a new therapeutic target in cardiac pathology.

Authors:  Tána Ravingerová; Miroslav Barancík; Monika Strnisková
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.396

8.  Cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality among patients starting dialysis.

Authors:  Dinanda J de Jager; Diana C Grootendorst; Kitty J Jager; Paul C van Dijk; Lonneke M J Tomas; David Ansell; Frederic Collart; Patrik Finne; James G Heaf; Johan De Meester; Jack F M Wetzels; Frits R Rosendaal; Friedo W Dekker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Comorbidity and acute clinical events as determinants of C-reactive protein variation in hemodialysis patients: implications for patient survival.

Authors:  Sunna Snaedal; Olof Heimbürger; Abdul Rashid Qureshi; Anders Danielsson; Björn Wikström; Bengt Fellström; Ingela Fehrman-Ekholm; Juan Jesús Carrero; Anders Alvestrand; Peter Stenvinkel; Peter Bárány
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 10.  Emerging biomarkers for evaluating cardiovascular risk in the chronic kidney disease patient: how do new pieces fit into the uremic puzzle?

Authors:  Peter Stenvinkel; Juan Jesús Carrero; Jonas Axelsson; Bengt Lindholm; Olof Heimbürger; Ziad Massy
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 8.237

View more
  15 in total

1.  Comparison of Proteomic Assessment Methods in Multiple Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Laura M Raffield; Hong Dang; Katherine A Pratte; Sean Jacobson; Lucas A Gillenwater; Elizabeth Ampleford; Igor Barjaktarevic; Patricia Basta; Clary B Clish; Alejandro P Comellas; Elaine Cornell; Jeffrey L Curtis; Claire Doerschuk; Peter Durda; Claire Emson; Christine M Freeman; Xiuqing Guo; Annette T Hastie; Gregory A Hawkins; Julio Herrera; W Craig Johnson; Wassim W Labaki; Yongmei Liu; Brett Masters; Michael Miller; Victor E Ortega; George Papanicolaou; Stephen Peters; Kent D Taylor; Stephen S Rich; Jerome I Rotter; Paul Auer; Alex P Reiner; Russell P Tracy; Debby Ngo; Robert E Gerszten; Wanda K O'Neal; Russell P Bowler
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 2.  Motoric cognitive risk syndrome: Integration of two early harbingers of dementia in older adults.

Authors:  Richard D Semba; Qu Tian; Michelle C Carlson; Qian-Li Xue; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2020-01-26       Impact factor: 10.895

3.  Circulating Plasma Biomarkers in Biopsy-Confirmed Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Insa M Schmidt; Suraj Sarvode Mothi; Parker C Wilson; Ragnar Palsson; Anand Srivastava; Ingrid F Onul; Zoe A Kibbelaar; Min Zhuo; Afolarin Amodu; Isaac E Stillman; Helmut G Rennke; Benjamin D Humphreys; Sushrut S Waikar
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Prognostic Value of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2 in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Guangying Guo; Aoran Huang; Xin Huang; Tianhua Xu; Li Yao
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.434

5.  Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is a potential biomarker of both diabetic kidney disease and future cardiovascular events in cohorts of individuals with type 2 diabetes: a proteomics approach.

Authors:  Axel C Carlsson; Christoph Nowak; Lars Lind; Carl Johan Östgren; Fredrik H Nyström; Johan Sundström; Juan Jesus Carrero; Ulf Riserus; Erik Ingelsson; Tove Fall; Johan Ärnlöv
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.384

6.  Trial design and baseline characteristics of CaLIPSO: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of SNF472 in patients receiving haemodialysis with cardiovascular calcification.

Authors:  Antonio Bellasi; Paolo Raggi; Jordi Bover; David A Bushinsky; Glenn M Chertow; Markus Ketteler; Mariano Rodriguez; Smeeta Sinha; Carolina Salcedo; Rekha Garg; Alex Gold; Joan Perelló
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2019-10-30

Review 7.  TRAIL and Cardiovascular Disease-A Risk Factor or Risk Marker: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kakareko; Alicja Rydzewska-Rosołowska; Edyta Zbroch; Tomasz Hryszko
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Proteomic profiling identifies key differences between inter-stage infants with single ventricle heart disease and healthy controls.

Authors:  Benjamin S Frank; Ludmila Khailova; Lori Silveira; Max B Mitchell; Gareth J Morgan; Elena W Y Hsieh; Michael V DiMaria; Mark Twite; Jelena Klawitter; Jesse A Davidson
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 7.012

9.  Positron Emission Tomography Can Support the Diagnosis of Dialysis-Related Amyloidosis.

Authors:  Giulia Santagati; Emanuela Cataldo; Valeria Columbano; Antoine Chatrenet; Daniele Penna; Ettore Pelosi; Mammar Hachemi; Lurlinys Gendrot; Louise Nielsen; Francesco Cinquantini; Patrick Saulnier; Vincenzo Arena; Charles Boursot; Giorgina Barbara Piccoli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with end-stage of renal disease.

Authors:  Seonhwa Lee; Jaewon Oh; Hyoeun Kim; Jaehyung Ha; Kyeong-Hyeon Chun; Chan Joo Lee; Sungha Park; Sang-Hak Lee; Seok-Min Kang
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.