| Literature DB >> 30498996 |
Charlotte Kawecki1, Olivier Bocquet1, Christian E H Schmelzer2,3, Andrea Heinz3,4, Christian Ihling3, Amandine Wahart1, Béatrice Romier1, Amar Bennasroune1, Sébastien Blaise1, Christine Terryn5, Kenneth J Linton6, Laurent Martiny1, Laurent Duca1, Pascal Maurice7.
Abstract
In addition to its critical role in lysosomes for catabolism of sialoglycoconjugates, NEU1 is expressed at the plasma membrane and regulates a myriad of receptors by desialylation, playing a key role in many pathophysiological processes. Here, we developed a proteomic approach dedicated to the purification and identification by LC-MS/MS of plasma membrane NEU1 interaction partners in human macrophages. Already known interaction partners were identified as well as several new candidates such as the class B scavenger receptor CD36. Interaction between NEU1 and CD36 was confirmed by complementary approaches. We showed that elastin-derived peptides (EDP) desialylate CD36 and that this effect was blocked by the V14 peptide, which blocks the interaction between bioactive EDP and the elastin receptor complex (ERC). Importantly, EDP also increased the uptake of oxidized LDL by macrophages that is blocked by both the V14 peptide and the sialidase inhibitor 2-deoxy-2,3-didehydro-N-acetylneuraminic acid (DANA). These results demonstrate, for the first time, that binding of EDP to the ERC indirectly modulates CD36 sialylation level and regulates oxidized LDL uptake through this sialidase. These effects could contribute to the previously reported proatherogenic role of EDP and add a new dimension in the regulation of biological processes through NEU1.Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; CD36; Elastin-derived peptides; NEU1; Sialylation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30498996 PMCID: PMC6514072 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-018-2978-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci ISSN: 1420-682X Impact factor: 9.261
Fig. 1Workflow of the proteomic approach and validation of the purification procedure. a The approach uses a two-step purification. The first step involves biotinylation of plasma membrane proteins from adherent COS-7 cells overexpressing NEU1-Flag with the non-permeable reagent EZ-Link® sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin. After cell lysis, protein lysates were incubated with monomeric avidin agarose beads to retain biotinylated plasma membrane proteins. After elution by free biotin, recovered proteins were subjected to the second step of purification which consists of immunoprecipitation of NEU1 and associated interaction partners using polyclonal rabbit anti-NEU1 antibodies. Bound material was then eluted from beads, fractionated by SDS-PAGE and stained by Coomassie blue. After systematic excision from the gel and in-gel trypsin digestion, the extracted peptides were analyzed by nano-LC–ESI MS/MS using an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. b COS-7 cells overexpressing human NEU1-Flag were subjected to the purification procedure (a) and the presence of NEU1-Flag at each step of the purification was checked by Western blot using a mouse monoclonal anti-Flag antibody (1/1000). The figure is representative of three independent experiments. NEU1-Flag−, non-transfected cells; NEU1-Flag+, cells co-transfected with NEU1-Flag and PPCA. c Sialidase activity associated with monomeric avidin agarose beads was measured using 200 µM of 2-O-(p-nitrophenyl)-α-d-N-acetylneuraminic acid substrate in 20 mM MES at pH 4.5. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of four independent experiments and statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test (*p < 0.05). NEU1− non-transfected cells; NEU1+ cells co-transfected with NEU1 and PPCA
Fig. 2Large-scale purification of membrane NEU1 and identification of already know interaction partners. a Left panel: 4.8 × 108 macrophages differentiated from THP-1 cells were submitted to the purification protocol and proteins recovered at the end of the purification were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained by Coomassie Blue (lane 2). Lane 1, protein lysate (starting material); lane 3, proteins recovered after elution with Laemmli buffer of protein G Sepharose beads coated with anti-NEU1 antibodies only. Asterisks, non-specific protein bands recovered in both lanes 2 and 3. Right panel: as illustrated for lane 2, lanes were excised into 23 bands and in-gel digested by trypsin for analysis by mass spectrometry. b Identification by LC–MS/MS of already know interaction partners of membrane NEU1. Trypsin-digested protein bands were analyzed by nano-LC–ESI MS/M, and proteins identified with Mascot software in Swiss-Prot and trEMBL databases
Protein identification by LC–MS/MS
| UnitProt accession number | Protein name | % coverage | Number of unique peptide | Average molecular mass (kDa) | Band no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Membrane-bound proteins | |||||
| Q96CX2|KCD12_HUMAN | BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD12 | 16 | 4 | 35.7 | 7 |
| Q9UGN4|CLM8_HUMAN | CMRF35-like molecule 8 | 9 | 2 | 33.2 | 16, 17 |
| O75131|CPNE3_HUMAN | Copine-3 | 6 | 2 | 60.1 | 13 |
| Q99961|SH3G1_HUMAN | Endophilin-A2 | 12 | 4 | 41.5 | 11 |
| P54753|EPHB3_HUMAN | Ephrin type-B receptor 3 | 2 | 2 | 110.3 | 5 |
| Q3B8N2|LEG9B_HUMAN | Galectin-9B | 10 | 3 | 39.7 | 1, 21, 23 |
| Q6DKI2|LEG9C_HUMAN | Galectin-9C | 10 | 3 | 39.6 | 1, 21, 23 |
| P48307|TFPI2_HUMAN | Tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 | 10 | 2 | 26.9 | 9, 10 |
| Transmembrane proteins | |||||
| P20273|CD22_HUMAN | B-cell receptor CD22 | 11 | 8 | 95.3 | 22 |
| P21730|C5AR1_HUMAN | C5a anaphylatoxin chemotactic receptor 1 | 8 | 2 | 39.3 | 12, 22 |
| P08962|CD63_HUMAN | CD63 antigen | 7 | 2 | 25.6 | 15 |
| P60033|CD81_HUMAN | CD81 antigen | 12 | 2 | 25.8 | 2 |
| P16671|CD36_HUMAN | Platelet glycoprotein 4 (CD36 | 14 | 5 | 53.1 | 20, 21 |
| Q15438|CYH1_HUMAN | Cytohesin-1 | 19 | 2 | 46.4 | 14 |
| Q8WXG9|GPR98_HUMAN | G-protein-coupled receptor 98 | 1 | 3 | 693.1 | 19 |
| P18462|1A25_HUMAN | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A-25 alpha chain | 8 | 2 | 41.2 | 15 |
| P30450|1A26_HUMAN | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A-26 alpha chain | 8 | 2 | 41.1 | 15 |
| P30512|1A29_HUMAN | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A-29 alpha chain | 8 | 2 | 40.9 | 15 |
| P16189|1A31_HUMA | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A-31 alpha chain | 8 | 2 | 41.0 | 15 |
| P10314|1A32_HUMAN | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A-32 alpha chain | 17 | 4 | 41.0 | 15, 16 |
| P16190|1A33_HUMAN | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A-33 alpha chain | 8 | 2 | 40.9 | 15 |
| P30453|1A34_HUMAN | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A-34 alpha chain | 8 | 2 | 41.1 | 15 |
| P30456|1A43_HUMAN | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A-43 alpha chain | 8 | 2 | 41.0 | 15 |
| P30457|1A66_HUMAN | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A-66 alpha chain | 8 | 2 | 41.1 | 15 |
| P01891|1A68_HUMAN | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A-68 alpha chain | 8 | 2 | 40.9 | 15 |
| P30459|1A74_HUMAN | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A-74 alpha chain | 17 | 4 | 40.9 | 15, 16 |
| P04222|1C03_HUMAN | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, Cw-3 alpha chain | 27 | 2 | 40.9 | 13 |
| P30505|1C08_HUMAN | HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, Cw-8 alpha chain | 44 | 2 | 40.8 | 13 |
| P23467|PTPRB_HUMAN | Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase beta | 1 | 2 | 224.3 | 12 |
| Q12913|PTPRJ_HUMAN | Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase eta | 3 | 3 | 145.9 | 20 |
| Signaling | |||||
| P31947|1433S_HUMAN | 14–3–3 protein sigma | 5 | 2 | 27.8 | 13 |
| Q99996|AKAP9_HUMAN | A-kinase anchor protein 9 | 0 | 2 | 453.7 | 13 |
| Q12802|AKP13_HUMAN | A-kinase anchor protein 13 | 0 | 3 | 307.6 | 3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 15 |
| P62158|CALM_HUMAN | Calmodulin | 41 | 8 | 16.8 | 1 |
| P01112|RASH_HUMAN | GTPase HRas | 12 | 2 | 21.3 | 10 |
| P01111|RASN_HUMAN | GTPase NRas | 12 | 2 | 21.2 | 10 |
| Q9UMX6|GUC1B_HUMAN | Guanylyl cyclase-activating protein 2 | 32 | 7 | 23.4 | 1, 3, 5, 9 |
| Q16539|MK14_HUMAN | Mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 | 19 | 5 | 41.3 | 13 |
| Q9Y314|NOSIP_HUMAN | Nitric oxide synthase-interacting protein | 30 | 7 | 33.2 | 11 |
| P49593|PPM1F_HUMAN | Protein phosphatase 1F | 44 | 20 | 49.8 | 16, 17 |
| Q13188|STK3_HUMAN | Serine/threonine-protein kinase 3 | 10 | 4 | 56.3 | 18 |
| O00506|STK25_HUMAN | Serine/threonine-protein kinase 25 | 12 | 2 | 48.1 | 17 |
| Q9P289|STK26_HUMAN | Serine/threonine-protein kinase 26 | 19 | 4 | 46.5 | 15 |
| Q86Y07|VRK2_HUMAN | Serine/threonine-protein kinase VRK2 | 7 | 3 | 58.1 | 16 |
| Q9UKE5|TNIK_HUMAN | TRAF2 and NCK-interacting protein kinase | 8 | 3 | 154.9 | 17, 19 |
| P07948|LYN_HUMAN | Tyrosine-protein kinase Lyn | 5 | 2 | 58.6 | 16 |
| Q12866|MERTK_HUMAN | Tyrosine-protein kinase Mer | 8 | 7 | 110.2 | 23 |
| Q9UGJ0|AAKG2_HUMAN | 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase subunit gamma-2 | 3 | 2 | 63.1 | 13 |
| Q96JB6|LOXL4_HUMAN | Lysyl oxidase homolog 4 | 7 | 4 | 84.5 | 19 |
| P01033|TIMP1_HUMAN | Metalloproteinase inhibitor 1 | 11 | 2 | 23.2 | 5 |
| Cytoskeleton | |||||
| O15143|ARC1B_HUMAN | Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 1B | 20 | 6 | 41.0 | 12 |
| P59998|ARPC4_HUMAN | Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 4 | 21 | 4 | 19.7 | 1 |
| Q562R1|ACTBL_HUMAN | Beta-actin-like protein 2 | 39 | 2 | 42.0 | 12, 13 |
| Q86UX7|URP2_HUMAN | Fermitin family homolog 3 | 6 | 2 | 76.0 | 18, 19, 22 |
| Q9UGP4|LIMD1_HUMAN | LIM domain-containing protein 1 | 11 | 5 | 72.2 | 19 |
| P19105|ML12A_HUMAN | Myosin regulatory light chain 12A | 30 | 5 | 19.8 | 112 |
| O14950|ML12B_HUMAN | Myosin regulatory light chain 12B | 30 | 5 | 19.8 | 1 |
| P24844|MYL9_HUMAN | Myosin regulatory light polypeptide 9 | 17 | 3 | 19.8 | 1 |
| P07737|PROF1_HUMAN | Profilin-1 | 19 | 2 | 15.1 | 13 |
| Q13464|ROCK1_HUMAN | Rho-associated protein kinase 1 | 3 | 4 | 158.2 | 23 |
| Q71U36|TBA1A_HUMAN | Tubulin alpha-1A chain | 9 | 3 | 50.1 | 1, 2, 10, 11 |
| Q6PEY2|TBA3E_HUMAN | Tubulin alpha-3E chain | 28 | 3 | 49.9 | 13 |
| Q9BVA1|TBB2B_HUMAN | Tubulin beta-2B chain | 5 | 2 | 49.9 | 11 |
| P04350|TBB4A_HUMAN | Tubulin beta-4A chain | 32 | 4 | 49.6 | 11, 12 |
| Vesicle trafficking | |||||
| Q92928|RAB1C_HUMAN | Putative Ras-related protein Rab-1C | 37 | 5 | 22.1 | 1, 4 |
| Q92546|RGP1_HUMAN | RAB6A-GEF complex partner protein 2 | 12 | 4 | 42.5 | 13, 14 |
| Q5HYI8|RABL3_HUMAN | Rab-like protein 3 | 22 | 6 | 26.4 | 7 |
| Q9H0U4|RAB1B_HUMAN | Ras-related protein Rab-1B | 37 | 5 | 22.2 | 1, 4 |
| Q14964|RB39A_HUMAN | Ras-related protein Rab-39A | 26 | 5 | 25.0 | 1 |
| O43752|STX6_HUMAN | Syntaxin-6 | 9 | 2 | 29.2 | 10 |
Trypsin-digested protein bands from two independent experiments were analyzed by nano-LC-ESI MS/MS and proteins identified with Mascot software in Swiss-Prot and trEMBL databases
Fig. 3Validation of the interaction between NEU1 and CD36 in COS-7 cells and functional consequences on the sialylation level of CD36. A Colocalization of NEU1 and CD36 at the cell surface of COS-7 cells co-expressing human NEU1 and human CD36 by confocal microscopy acquisitions. Areas of colocalization at the plasma membrane are indicated by white arrows. Images are representative of two independent experiments. B FRET experiments in COS-7 cells expressing CD36-Teal (energy donor) or CD36-Teal and NEU1-YFP (energy acceptor). Confocal images after spectral unmixing for the donor (a, c, e) and the acceptor (b, d, f) in a cell incubated (e, f), or not (a–d), with kE (50 µg/mL, 1 h), or without acceptor (a, b). Zoom area of calculated FRET efficiency are presented in Fire LUT for each condition (g, h). White arrows indicate areas of higher FRET efficiency. The graph represents the mean FRET efficiency ± SEM of three independent experiments (three cells/experiment). For each cell, thirty regions of interest of 0.62 µm2 contouring the cell were chosen. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test (***p < 0.001 versus no acceptor; ns non-significant). Scale bar: 10 µm. C Left panel: NEU1-HA was immunoprecipitated with a rabbit monoclonal anti-HA antibody from whole lysate of COS-7 cells expressing CD36 (NEU1-HA−/CD36+) or co-expressing human NEU1-HA and CD36 (NEU1-HA+/CD36+). Co-immunoprecipitation of CD36 was monitored by Western blot using a mouse monoclonal anti-CD36 antibody (1/500). The figure is representative of six independent experiments. Right panel: blot quantification by densitometry analysis. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of six independent experiments and normalized to NEU1-HA−/CD36+ condition. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test (*p < 0.05). D Left panel: CD36 was immunoprecipitated with a mouse monoclonal anti-CD36 antibody from whole lysate of COS-7 cells expressing NEU1-HA (CD36−/NEU1-HA+) or co-expressing NEU1-HA and CD36 (CD36+/NEU1-HA+). Co-immunoprecipitation of NEU1-HA was monitored by Western blot using a rabbit monoclonal anti-HA antibody (1/1000). The figure is representative of four independent experiments. Right panel: blot quantification by densitometry analysis. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of four independent experiments and normalized to CD36−/NEU1-HA+ condition. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test (**p < 0.01). E Lectin blotting after immunoprecipitation of CD36 from whole lysates of COS-7 cells expressing CD36 (CD36) or co-expressing CD36 and NEU1 (CD36/NEU1). Nitrocellulose membranes were incubated with digoxigenin-labeled SNA or MAA lectins followed by anti-digoxigenin antibodies coupled to alkaline-phosphatase according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Detection of immunoprecipitated CD36 was revealed as described above. The figure is representative of two independent experiments. F Left panel: SNA pulldown of crude membrane preparations of COS-7 cells expressing NEU1 (NEU1) or co-expressing CD36 and NEU1 (CD36/NEU1), and incubated, or not, with kE (50 µg/mL, 1 h). For each condition, equal amount of proteins was used. The amount of sialylated CD36 recovered after SNA pulldown was evaluated by Western blot using a mouse monoclonal anti-CD36 antibody as described above. The figure is representative of three independent experiments. Right panel: quantification of the sialylation level of CD36 (pulldown/lysate ratio) by densitometry analysis. The sialylation level of CD36 was normalized to the control condition (without kE, w/o). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments and statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test (*p < 0.05)
Fig. 4Validation of the interaction between NEU1 and CD36 in human macrophages and functional consequences on the sialylation level of CD36. a Colocalization of NEU1 and CD36 at the cell surface of macrophages differentiated from THP-1 cells, and stimulated, or not, with kE (50 µg/mL, 1 h), by confocal microscopy acquisitions. Areas of colocalization at the plasma membrane are indicated by white arrows. Images are representative of two independent experiments. b Left panel: distribution of the β2-integrin between the cytosol and crude membrane fractions (30 µg each) of macrophages by Western blot using a mouse monoclonal anti β2-integrin (1/500). The figure is representative of three independent experiments. Right panel: blots quantification by densitometry analysis. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments and statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test (***p < 0.001). c NEU1 was immunoprecipitated with a rabbit polyclonal anti-NEU1 antibody from crude membrane preparations of macrophages and co-immunoprecipitation of CD36 was monitored by Western blot using a mouse monoclonal anti-CD36 antibody. The figure is representative of three independent experiments. d CD36 was immunoprecipitated with a mouse monoclonal anti-CD36 antibody from crude membrane preparations of macrophages and co-immunoprecipitation of NEU1 was monitored by Western blot using a rabbit polyclonal anti-NEU1 antibody (1/500). The figure is representative of two independent experiments. e CD36 was immunoprecipitated with a mouse monoclonal anti-CD36 antibody from whole lysate of macrophages and co-immunoprecipitation of NEU3 was monitored by Western blot using a rabbit polyclonal anti-NEU3 antibody (1/500). The figure is representative of three independent experiments. f Up panel: sialidase activity at the plasma membrane of adherent macrophages was measured using 400 µM of 2′-(4-methylumbelliferyl)-α-d-N-acetylneuraminic acid substrate in 20 mM CH3COONa (pH 6.5) before and after incubation with kE (50 µg/mL, 2 h). Macrophages were either non-transfected or transfected with 50 nM negative control siRNA (siCont) or NEU1 siRNA (siNEU1). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of three to nine independent experiments and normalized to the control (non-transfected, without kE). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (***p < 0.001; ns non-significant). Down panel: expression level of NEU1 in macrophages transfected with 50 nM negative control siRNA (siCont) or NEU1 siRNA (siNEU1) and monitored by Western blot using a rabbit polyclonal anti-NEU1 antibody. The blot is representative of three independent experiments (left). Blots were quantified by densitometry analysis, and results expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments and normalized to negative control siRNA (siCont). Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test (**p < 0.01. g SNA pulldown of crude membrane preparations of macrophages incubated, or not, with kE (50 µg/mL), V14 + kE (molar ratio 2:1) or V14 peptide alone for 1 h at 37 °C. For each condition, equal amount of proteins was used. The amount of sialylated CD36 recovered after SNA pulldown was evaluated and quantified as depicted in Fig. 3F. The sialylation level of CD36 was normalized to the respective control (w/o or V14) and results expressed as mean ± SEM of three to five independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test (*p < 0.05; ns non-significant)
Fig. 5EDP increase the uptake of Dil-oxLDL in human macrophages through the ERC and its NEU1 subunit. a Human adherent macrophages were incubated with kE (50 µg/mL), DANA (400 µM), DANA + kE, V14 + kE (molar ratio 2:1) or V14 peptide alone for 1 h at 37 °C prior to the addition of 10 µM Dil-oxLDL (4 h, 37 °C). Cells were then washed, fixed and visualized by a fluorescent microscope. A representative field is shown. The inset corresponds to a zoom area of the kE condition and white arrows show the presence of DiI-oxLDL particles inside the cells. b The mean gray value per field for each condition was calculated and normalized to the respective control (w/o, DANA, V14). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of six independent experiments (ten different fields/experiment). Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test (***p < 0.001; ns non-significant)