| Literature DB >> 30498652 |
Alexander S Pashchenko1, Leonid S Lunin1,2, Eleonora M Danilina1, Sergei N Chebotarev2.
Abstract
This work reports on an experimental investigation of the influence of vertical stacking of quantum dots, the thickness of GaAs potential barriers, and their isovalent doping with bismuth on the photoluminescence properties of InAs/GaAs heterostructures. The experimental samples were grown by ion-beam deposition. We showed that using three vertically stacked layers of InAs quantum dots separated by thin GaAs barrier layers was accompanied by a red-shift of the photoluminescence peak of InAs/GaAs heterostructures. An increase in the thickness of the GaAs barrier layers was accompanied by a blue shift of the photoluminescence peak. The effect of isovalent Bi doping of the GaAs barrier layers on the structural and optical properties of the InAs/GaAs heterostructures was investigated. It was found that the Bi content up to 4.96 atom % in GaAs decreases the density of InAs quantum dots from 1.53 × 1010 to 0.93 × 1010 cm-2. In addition, the average lateral size of the InAs quantum dots increased from 14 to 20 nm, due to an increase in the surface diffusion of In. It is shown that isovalent doping of GaAs potential barriers by bismuth was accompanied by a red-shift of the photoluminescence peak of InAs quantum dots of 121 meV.Entities:
Keywords: infrared photodetectors; ion-beam deposition; nanoheterostructures; photoluminescence; quantum dot; semiconductors
Year: 2018 PMID: 30498652 PMCID: PMC6244215 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.9.261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1a) Photoluminescence spectra of samples with vertically stacked InAs QD arrays; b) full width at half maximum of ground state peaks as a function of the number of InAs QD layers.
Figure 2a) Photoluminescence spectra of the InAs/GaAs heterostructures with different thicknesses of the GaAs barrier layer; b) full width at half maximum of ground state photoluminescence peaks as a function of the thickness of the i-GaAs barrier layer.
Figure 3a) XRD spectra of GaAs1−Bi films grown on GaAs(100) substrates; b) Raman spectra of InAs/GaAs and InAs/GaAs1−Bi heterostructures.
Figure 4a) Photoluminescence spectra of InAs/GaAs heterostructures with different Bi content; b) Atomic force microscopy images of the morphology of InAs QDs on GaAs0.95Bi0.05; c) Atomic force microscopy images of the morphology of InAs QDs on GaAs.
Figure 5Energy band diagram of heterostructures: a) InAs/GaAs; b) InAs/GaAs1−Bi.