| Literature DB >> 30498560 |
Iara L L de Souza1,2, Elba Dos S Ferreira1, Anderson F A Diniz1, Maria Thaynan de L Carvalho3, Fernando R Queiroga1, Lydiane T Toscano4, Alexandre S Silva4, Patrícia M da Silva5, Fabiana de A Cavalcante1,2, Bagnólia A da Silva1,6.
Abstract
Few studies have associated the effects of changes in caloric intake and redox disturbances in the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, the present study aimed at evaluating the hypercaloric diet consumption influence on the contractile reactivity of intestinal smooth muscle, morphology, and oxidative stress of rat ileum. Wistar rats were randomly divided into groups that received a standard diet and fed with a hypercaloric diet for 8 weeks. Animals were euthanized, and the ileum was isolated to isotonic contraction monitoring. Morphology was evaluated by histological staining and oxidative stress by quantification of malondialdehyde levels and total antioxidant activity. Cumulative concentration-response curves to KCl and carbachol were attenuated in rats fed with a hypercaloric diet compared to those that received a standard diet. In addition, an increase in caloric intake promotes a rise in the thickness of the longitudinal smooth muscle layer of rat ileum and tissue malondialdehyde levels, characterizing lipid peroxidation, as well as a decrease in the antioxidant activity. Thus, it was concluded that the consumption of a hypercaloric diet impairs rat intestinal contractility due to mechanisms involving modifications in the intestinal smooth muscle architecture triggered by redox disturbances.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30498560 PMCID: PMC6222220 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6364821
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Cumulative concentration-response curves to KCl (a) and CCh (b) in rat ileum from both SD (▲) and HD groups (∆). The symbols and vertical bars represent the mean and S.E.M., respectively (n = 5). Student's t-test, ∗p < 0.05 (SD vs. HD).
Values of Emax (%) and pCE50 of KCl and CCh in rat ileum from both SD and HD groups. Student's t-test, ∗p < 0.05 (SD vs. HD) (n = 5).
| Groups | KCl | CCh | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| pCE50 |
| pCE50 | |
| SD | 100 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 100 | 6.3 ± 0.05 |
| HD | 42.7 ± 3.1∗ | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 32.7 ± 7.5∗ | 6.6 ± 0.1∗ |
Figure 2Microphotography of rat ileum from both SD (a) and HD groups (b) and thickness of CML and LML (c). Increased lens 20x. The symbols and vertical bars represent the mean and S.E.M., respectively (n = 5). Student's t-test, ∗p < 0.05 (SD vs. HD). CML = circular muscle layer; LML = longitudinal muscle layer; VI = villus.
Figure 3Concentration of MDA (a) and antioxidant activity (b) of rat ileum from both SD and HD groups. The symbols and vertical bars represent the mean and S.E.M., respectively (n = 5). Student's t-test, ∗p < 0.05 (SD vs. HD). MDA = malondialdehyde.