Literature DB >> 30498425

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Primary Implant Reconstruction: Surgical and Oncological Outcome of 435 Breast Cancer Patients.

Zoran Radovanovic1,2, Milan Ranisavljevic1,2, Dragana Radovanovic1,2, Ferenc Vicko1,2, Tatjana Ivkovic-Kapicl1,2, Nenad Solajic1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the incidence of surgical complications associated with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with primary implant reconstruction, analyze risk factors for early and late surgical complications of NSM, and determine the incidence of local recurrences and the safety of sparing the nipple-areola complex (NAC).
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 435 patients with 441 NSM procedures over a period of 9 years (2004-2012). All surgical complications and the oncological outcome were recorded during follow-up.
RESULTS: The most common early surgical complication was skin flap ischemia/necrosis (26 patients, 5.9%). Prosthesis explantation due to complications was carried out in 11 (2.5%) cases. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, implant size >500 ml, diabetes mellitus, body mass index > 25 kg/m2, and incisions other than lateral were risk factors for early complications (p < 0.001). The NAC excision rate was 5.4% (24 cases) due to confirmed presence of cancer cells in the subareolar tissue. Capsular contracture as a late complication occurred in 33 (7.48%) cases. Local relapse occurred in 32 (7.3%) patients. Distant metastases were diagnosed in 68 (15.6%) patients, and 53 (12.2%) patients died during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: NSM with immediate implant reconstruction has an acceptable morbidity rate and is an oncologically and surgically appropriate treatment for most women requiring mastectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Complications; Nipple-sparing mastectomy; Oncological outcome

Year:  2018        PMID: 30498425      PMCID: PMC6257155          DOI: 10.1159/000489317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  46 in total

1.  Influence of some operative and postoperative factors on capsular contracture around breast prostheses.

Authors:  C J Hipps; R Raju; R E Straith
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Clinical relevance of positive breast periprosthetic cultures without overt infection.

Authors:  D T Netscher; G Weizer; P Wigoda; L E Walker; J Thornby; D Bowen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  C Laronga; B Kemp; D Johnston; G L Robb; S E Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Quality-of-Life Outcomes Improve with Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher R Bailey; Onyebuchi Ogbuagu; Pablo A Baltodano; Usamah F Simjee; Michele A Manahan; Damon S Cooney; Lisa K Jacobs; Theodore N Tsangaris; Carisa M Cooney; Gedge D Rosson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  A prospective assessment of surgical risk factors in 400 cases of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants to establish selection criteria.

Authors:  Leonie A E Woerdeman; J Joris Hage; Marjolein M I Hofland; Emiel J Th Rutgers
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with previous breast surgery: comparative analysis of 775 immediate breast reconstructions.

Authors:  Michael J Frederick; Alex M Lin; Robert Neuman; Barbara L Smith; William G Austen; Amy S Colwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Feasibility of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less Than 2.0 cm.

Authors:  Jai Min Ryu; Seok Jin Nam; Seok Won Kim; Se Kyung Lee; Soo Youn Bae; Ha Woo Yi; Sungmin Park; Hyun-June Paik; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Two-year follow-up of areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction.

Authors:  Rache M Simmons; Scott T Hollenbeck; Gregory S Latrenta
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Embrace the Change: Incorporating Single-Stage Implant Breast Reconstruction into Your Practice.

Authors:  Jose Rodriguez-Feliz; Mark A Codner
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Is there liability with chemotherapy following immediate breast construction?

Authors:  G J Yule; M J Concannon; G Croll; C L Puckett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  3 in total

1.  How Long is It Safe to Wait for Breast Surgery After Completion of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Authors:  Tianyi Ma; Yan Mao; Haibo Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Post-Operative Complications and Nipple Necrosis Rates Between Conventional and Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Jeea Lee; Hyung Seok Park; Haemin Lee; Dong Won Lee; Seung Yong Song; Dae Hyun Lew; Jee Ye Kim; Seho Park; Seung Il Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Prognosis Comparison Between Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Total Mastectomy in Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study After Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Mengdie Fu; Qitong Chen; Liyun Zeng; Tao Hong; Qiongyan Zou; Yunchang Yuan; Wenjun Yi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 5.344

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.