Literature DB >> 30497792

Preoperatively predicting non-home discharge after surgery for gynecologic malignancy.

Courtney A Penn1, Neil S Kamdar2, Daniel M Morgan3, Ryan J Spencer4, Shitanshu Uppal5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Returning home after surgery is a desirable patient-centered outcome associated with decreased costs compared to non-home discharge. Our objective was to develop a preoperative risk-scoring model predicting non-home discharge after surgery for gynecologic malignancy.
METHODS: Women who underwent surgery involving hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancy from 2013 to 2015 were identified from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database. Patients were divided by discharge destination, and a multivariable logistic regression model was developed to create a nomogram to assign case-specific risk scores. The model was validated using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
RESULTS: Non-home discharge occurred in 3.1% of 2134 women. The proportion of non-home discharges did not differ by cancer diagnosis (uterine 3.5%, ovarian 2.5%, and cervical 1.6%, p = 0.2). Skilled nursing facilities were the most common non-home destination (68.2%). Among patients with comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease /dyspnea, arrhythmia, and history of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism), non-home discharge was more common in women with 1 (adjusted OR [aOR] 3.4; p = 0.03) or ≥2 of these comorbidities (aOR 5.1; p = 0.003) compared to none. Non-home discharge was more common after laparotomy (aOR 6.7; p < 0.0001) than laparoscopy, and in those aged ≥70 years (aOR 3.4; p < 0.0001) with American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥ 3 (aOR 4.5; p = 0.0004) and dependent functional status (aOR 8.7; p < 0.0001). The model C-statistic was 0.89. When the model was applied to 4248 eligible patients from the NSQIP dataset, the C-statistic was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.89).
CONCLUSIONS: Non-home discharge after surgery for gynecologic malignancy was predicted with high accuracy in this retrospective analysis.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discharge destination; Gynecologic malignancy; Hysterectomy; Prediction; Risk model

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30497792     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  3 in total

1.  Risk factors predicting the loss of functional independence after obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Logan Blankenship; Meadow M Good; Carmen Smotherman; Shiva Gautam; Ruchira Singh
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Preoperative Nomogram Predicts Non-home Discharge in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Katelyn F Flick; C Max Schmidt; Cameron L Colgate; Michele T Yip-Schneider; Chris M Sublette; Thomas K Maatman; Mazhar Soufi; Eugene P Ceppa; Michael G House; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Qualitative Interview Study of Gynecologic Oncologist Utilization of Recommended Same-Day Discharge Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sophia Bunde; Shalkar Adambekov; Ella Glikson; Faina Linkov
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.