| Literature DB >> 30497486 |
Rendan Zhang1, Tudi Li2, Jiao Guo2, Yanqun Zhao2, Yuhong Liu2, Yusi Yao2, Zhihuan Zeng3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of a Chinese herbal medicine Fufang-Zhenzhu Tiaozhi Capsule (FTZ) on restenosis and elucidate the mechanism of action.Entities:
Keywords: Animal model; FTZ; Inflammation; NF-κB; Restenosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30497486 PMCID: PMC6267089 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0921-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1The establishment of the restenosis model. (a) Left panels: Angiographic image results in each operation. Right panels: Quantitative analysis of MLD% and MLA% in each operation. **P < 0.01 vs. first angiography. (b) HE staining of aortic tissues from blank group and restenosis group. (c) Quantitative analysis of serum lipid levels blank group and restenosis group
Fig. 2Comparison of serum lipid profiles in each experimental group. Compared with the blank group, most of the lipid profiles were significantly increased in the restenosis group, while the increases were attenuated in drug groups. **P < 0.01 vs. restenosis group, *P < 0.05 vs. restenosis group, #P < 0.05 single-used drug group vs. mixed used group
Fig. 3Comparison of angiography results in each group. MLD% and MLA% were significantly increased in the restenosis group, while FTZ and atorvastatin reduced restenosis after PCI. **P < 0.01 vs. restenosis group
Fig. 4In vivo inhibition of neointimal formation after balloon injuries. (a) HE staining of aortic tissues from each group. (b) IT and IMRS were significantly thicker in the restenosis group than in blank group, but were reduced in drug groups. **P < 0.01 vs. restenosis group
Serum levels of inflammatory factors in each group
| Variable | blank group | restenosis group | atorvastatin group | FTZ group | mixed group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-1 (ng/ml) | 122.76 ± 11.39 | 161.96 ± 21.56 | 94.17 ± 24.53** | 94.42 ± 17.77** | 75.13 ± 14.01**# |
| IL-6 (ng/ml) | 339.72 ± 7.91** | 419.89 ± 43.35 | 349.64 ± 20.1 | 358.89 ± 20.92 | 324.44 ± 33.61 |
| IL-8(ng/ml) | 404.26 ± 109.85 | 994.9 ± 165.16 | 680.71 ± 53.1** | 605.46 ± 16.31** | 583.79 ± 154.89** |
| IL-12(ng/ml) | 175.89 ± 11.96** | 242.41 ± 33.32 | 192.57 ± 16.45 | 194.07 ± 18.76 | 188.72 ± 10.45 |
| CRP(mg/L) | 0.1 ± 0.0x | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 0.13 ± 0.04** | 0.16 ± 0.74** | 0.13 ± 0.02** |
| MCP-1 (ng/ml) | 214.15 ± 42.67 | 402.88 ± 41.9 | 265.92 ± 43.4** | 265.48 ± 47.6** | 257.99 ± 40.99** |
| ICAM-1(ng/ml) | 121.93 ± 8.16 | 156.57 ± 20.81 | 73.37 ± 44.52** | 49.99 ± 39.72** | 20.31 ± 8.93**# |
| TNF-a (ng/ml) | 12.69 ± 3.85 | 37.67 ± 20.14 | 22 ± 3.95** | 19.45 ± 2.94** | 14.18 ± 3.57** |
**P < 0.01 vs. restenosis group, *P < 0.05 vs. restenosis group, #P < 0.05 means single-used drug group vs. mixed group
Fig. 5The status of NF-κB pathway activation in abdominal aortas of each group. (a) Representative blots showing the levels of NF-κB pathway components in in abdominal aortas of each group. (b) Densitometry analysis of the levels of NF-κB pathway components (n = 3). **P < 0.01 vs. restenosis group