Prevalence and risk factors of pressure ulcer in hospitalized adult patients; a single center study from Ethiopia.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of pressure ulcer and its risk factors among adult hospitalized patients at Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia, 2016 G. C RESULT: A cross-sectional institutional based study with a single population proportion formula was used to determine the sample size. The total sample size of 355 patients was distributed proportionally to the respected wards. Every other patient was selected by systematic random sampling technique from each ward with a response rate of 100% A total of 53 patients with pressure ulcer were detected giving the prevalence rate of 14.9%. The lack of regular positioning and activity, friction/shear, and prolonged hospitalization were risk factors for pressure ulcer.

Introduction

Pressure ulcer (PU) also called bed sore is an area of localized damage to the skin and underlying tissue caused by pressure, shear, friction or a combination of these [1, 2]. PU ranges from areas of slightly discolored skin to area of deep purulent wound cavities that extend to underlying muscle and bone [3]. The amount of time it takes for PU to develop varies from as short as 2 h in patients at greatest risk. PU is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and one of the important measures of the quality of clinical care in a healthcare setting [4-6].

PU remains one of the major health problems around the world. For every 1,000,000 patients who developed PU 65,000 die from complications which presents a major health challenge worldwide [7, 8]. And also an 80% increase in the number of patients who were hospitalized from the year 1993 to 2006, which leads to PU occurrence [8].

As studies revealed, PU is common in high and middle-income countries but it is rarely researched in low-income countries A prevalence of 12.7% was reported in Brazil [9], 10.4% in Turkey [10], a higher prevalence of 47.6% in Thailand [11], and 16% in Ethiopia [12]. Also, studies on health professional knowledge about pressure ulcer in Uganda and Ethiopia [13, 14].

Moreover, researchers identified variety of factors that influence the occurrence of PU including friction/shear, moisture sensory perception, immobility, the position of the patient, length of hospital stay (LHS), gender, nutritional status of the patient, age and use of medical relieving devices [12, 15–18].

Therefore, assessing the prevalence and identifying the risk factors that influence the occurrence of PUs in resource-limited countries is important for possible interventions in the prevention of PU and increases the quality of care.

Main text

Methods

Institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia, from March to April 2016. This hospital has different wards. Among these Medical, Surgical, Gynecological, and Orthopedic wards were selected for this study.

All adult admitted patients and avail during the study period were the source and study population respectively. Patients who didn’t develop PU prior to admission and who stayed in the hospital ≥ 24 h were included but those patients who are critically ill were excluded from the study.

PU was the outcome) variable and sociodemographic variables, Braden risk assessment tool, clinical characteristics (like presence and type of chronic illness) and presence of medical relieving device were used for the independent variable.

The sample size was determined by using a single population proportion formula considering the following assumptions: prevalence (p) of pressure ulcer 16% taken from a recent study conducted in Ethiopia [12]. Z = standard normal distribution value at 95% confidence level of Za/2 = 1.96, and margin of error (w) = 5%. This gave a sample size of 323 admitted patients. Considering 10% nonresponse rate, the total sample size was 355.

Systematic random sampling technique was used to select every other patient and the first patient was selected by using lottery method.

Structured questionnaires which were developed by searching different scholars and a previous research paper on a similar study. And also physical examination to assess the presence or absence of PU and risk assessment by using checklist adapted from the Braden scale was used to collect data [8, 9].

The questionnaire was transcribed into Amharic (local language) by language experts and translated back to English by another language expert for consistency. Also, physical examination performed to assess and grade PU. Four B.Sc. nurses were used to collect data and two-second degree nurses assigned for supervision. Five-day training was given for both data collectors and supervisors. Data entry was done by using EPI Info version 7 statistical software and exported to SPSS version 20.0 software package for analysis.

Data quality was controlled by pre-testing the questionnaire on 36 admitted adult patients in another hospital (Borumeda) with the same setting. The presence of the association between outcome and independent variables was assessed using odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval by binary logistic regression model. Those variables having p value ≤ 0.2 in binary logistic regression model were entered into the multivariate analysis using forward ward likelihood ratio method. The final result was interpreted based upon their association of significance i.e. p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the patient

A total of 355 admitted patients with a response rate of 100% were included in this study. More than half of them were rural residents. The majority (52.1%) of the respondents were females. The mean (± standard deviation) age of the respondents was 37.2 (± 13.7) and the majority (43.7%) of them fall in the age range of 33–54. Most of the patients (65.1%) were married. About 31% of the patients were unable to read and write. 28.2% of them had a chronic illness and from this, 32.4% were diabetic (Table 1).

Table 1

Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of adult patients who were admitted at DRH, Northeast Ethiopia, 2016 G.C (N = 355)

Variables	Frequency	Percent
Age (in years)
18–32	146	41.2
33–54	156	43.9
> 54	53	14.9
Sex
Male	170	47.9
Female	185	52.1
Place of residence
Urban	167	47
Rural	188	53
Marital status
Single	73	20.6
Married	231	65.1
Divorced	32	9
Widowed	19	5.4
Educational status
Illiterate	110	31
Read and write	56	15.8
1–4 grade	34	9.6
5–8 grade	56	15.8
9–10 grade	58	16.3
> 10 grade	41	11.3
Presence of chronic illness
Yes	100	28.2
No	255	71.8
Types of chronic disease
Diabetes mellitus	33	32.4
Cardio vascular disease	25	24.5
Respiratory disease	12	11.8
Hypertension	14	13.7
Others	18	17.6
Presence of pressure ulcer
Yes	53	17.5
No	302	82.5
Stage of pressure ulcer
Stage 1	34	64
Stage 2	16	30
Stage 3	3	6
Anatomical site
Sacral	26	49.1
Heel	12	22.6
Elbow	4	7.5
Occiput	2	3.8
Shoulder	2	3.8
Sacral and shoulder	3	5.7
More than two sites	4	7.5

DRH Dessie Referral Hospital, GC Gregorian calender

Prevalence and stages of pressure ulcer

A total of 53 PU was detected, with the prevalence rate of 14.9% (11.2–18.9). The prevalence was higher among male respondents and the sacral anatomical site was the main one. Based on the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) grading scale 34 (64%) developed stage I PU (Table 1).

Braden scale pressure ulcer risk assessment characteristics of adult patients

Hundred sixty-six (46.8%) of the respondents had no impairment in their sensory perception and 168 (47.3%) walked frequently in their activity. Regarding mobility, 151 (42.2%) of patients had no limitation. Of the total admitted patients 205 (57.7%) were rarely moist, two-thirds (60.6%) of them had no apparent problem in their friction/shear and one-third (31.3%) of them had probably inadequate nutrition (Table 2).

Table 2

Braden scale pressure ulcer risk assessment characteristics of respondents who were admitted at DRH, Northeast Ethiopia, 2016 G.C (N = 355)

Variables	Frequency	Percent	Remark
Sensory perception
Completely limited	74	20.8
Very limited	61	17.2
Slightly limited	54	15.2
No impairment	166	46.8
Moisture
Constantly moist	48	13.5
Very moist	38	10.7
Occasionally moist	64	18
Rarely moist	205	57.7
Activity
Bedfast	60	16.9
Chair fast	40	11.3
Walks occasionally	87	24.5
Walks frequently	168	47.3
Mobility
Completely immobile	66	18.6
Very limited	42	11.8
Slightly limited	96	27
No limitation	151	42.2
Nutrition
Very poor	59	16.6
Probably inadequate	111	31.3
Adequate	142	40
Excellent	43	12.1
Friction and shear
Problem	59	16.6
Potential problem	81	22.8
No apparent problem	215	60.6

DRH Dessie Referral Hospital, GC Gregorian calendar

Factors associated with the occurrence of pressure ulcer

All independent variables were analyzed in binary logistic regression with the dependent variable to know their association. Among those variable LHS, the presence of chronic illness, use of medical devices, use of pressure relieving devices, position change, sensory perception, moisture, activity, mobility, friction/shear were found to be significant in binary logistic regression and then taken into multivariate analysis.

Those patients whose LHS was 7–20 days were 8.44 times more likely to develop PU than patients who were stayed for ≤ 6 days, patients who had chair and bedfast in their activities were found to be 11 times more likely to develop PU than those patients who were walked frequently, patients who had a problem of friction/shear had 16.4 times more risk to develop PU than those who had no apparent problem in friction/shear and patient’s position change also the other independent variable which was found to be associated with the PU. Those patients who were not changed their position had 10.42 times higher risk to develop PU than those who changed their position every 2–3 h.

Discussion

The prevalence of PU in this study was in line with studies conducted in Ethiopia (16%) [12], Germany 11.7% [19], Brazil (12.7%) [9], Turkey (11.7%) [10]. However, higher than international survey [20]. The possible explanation for this difference (higher prevalence rate) might be due to lack of advanced nursing facility and materials in the hospital, absence of risk assessment tool, lack of guideline for prevention and treatment of pressure ulcer which leads to poorly assessing the risks.

The prevalence is lower than the study conducted in Sweden (22.9%), Italy (27%), Australia (22%) and Thailand (47.6%) [11, 21–23].

LHS in this study significantly associated with PU. Patients whose LHS was 7–20 days were 8.44 times more likely to develop PU than those patients who were stayed for ≤ 06 days. This finding is consistent with studies conducted in Ethiopia and Sweden [12, 24]. When patients LHS increases, the risk of hospital-acquired infection increases which leads to the development of PU.

Activity is significantly associated with PU. Patients who had activity restriction (to chair and bed) were 11 times and 7.58 times respectively more likely to develop PU than those patients who walked frequently. This result is in line with the study conducted by Australian medical association [25]. The possible explanation for this might be due to the prolonged pressure on bony prominence which interferes circulation to the underlying skin and which in turn decreases the skin resistance to pressure (Table 3).

Table 3

Association between some selected variables and pressure ulcer at DRH, Northeast Ethiopia, 2016 G.C (N = 355)

Variable	Pressure ulcer		COR (95% CI)	AOR (95% CI)	Remark
	No	Yes
Length of stay (days)
≤ 6	145 (96.7%)	5 (3.3%)	1	1
7–20	143 (82.7%)	30 (17.3%)	6.1 (2.3, 16)*	8.44 (2.1, 34)**
≥ 21	8 (33.3%)	16 (66.7%)	58 (16.9, 198)*	7 (10, 52)**
Pressure relieving device
Yes	49 (96.1%)	2 (3.9%)	1
No	253 (83.2%)	51 (16.8%)	4.94 (1.16, 20)
Use of medical device
Yes	78 (75.5%)	25 (24.3%)	2.6 (1.4, 4.66)
No	229 (88.9%)	28 (11.1%)	1
Chronic illness
Yes	72 (72%)	28 (28%)	3.58 (1.4, 4.66)*	2.66 (0.78, 9)
No	230 (90.2%)	25 (9.8%)	1
Change position
Yes	203 (97.1%)	6 (2.9%)	1	1
No	99 (67.8%)	47 (32.2%)	16 (6.64, 38.8)*	10.42 (2.9, 37)**
Sensory perception
Completely limited	49 (66.2%)	25 (33.8%)	27.7 (8, 95.7)	1.85 (0.35, 9.8)
Very limited	40 (65.6%)	21 (34.4%)	28.5 (8, 100)	1.57 (0.24, 10.4)
Slightly limited	50 (92.6%)	4 (7.4%)	4.4 (0.94, 20.8)	0.63 (0.47, 8.25)
No impairment	163 (98.2%)	3 (1.8%)	1	1
Moisture
Constantly moist	25 (52.2%)	23 (47.8%)	22.6 (9.16, 56)	2.81 (0.55, 15)
Very moist	21(56.8%)	17 (44.7%)	19.9 (7.7, 51.7)	4.5 (0.82, 25).
Occasionally moist	59 (96.1%)	5 (7.8%)	2.12 (0.66, 6.6)	0.7 (0.09, 5.3)
Rarely moist	197 (95.6%)	8 (3.9%)	1	1
Activity
Bed fast	28 (46.7%)	32 (53.3%)	26.28 (10.6, 65)*	7.58 (1.7, 32)**
Chair fast	28 (70%)	12 (30%)	9.86 (3.6, 27.2)*	11 (2, 61)**
Walks occasionally	85 (97.7%)	2 (2.3%)	0.54 (0.11, 2.66)*	0.42 (0.043, 4.1)
Walks frequently	161 (995.6%)	7 (4.2%)	1	1
Friction/shear
Problem	17 (28.8%)	42 (7127%	86.06 (32, 231)	16.4 (4.4, 61)**
Potential problem	76 (93.8%)	5 (6.2%)	2.29 (0.68, 7.7)	11 (0.2, 5.6)
No apparent problem	209 (97.2%)	6 (2.8%)	1	1

The main objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of pressure ulcer and its risk factors among adult hospitalized patients at Dessie Referral Hospital Northeast Ethiopia, 2016 G.C Hospital

Strongly associated variables are in italic

COR crude odd ratio, AOR adjusted odd ratio, DRH Dessie Referral, GC Gregorian calendar

** p-value ≤ 0.05, * p-value ≤ 0.20 in binary logistic regression

The odds of developing Pu among patients who had a problem of friction/shear was 16.4 times more likely than those who had no apparent problem in friction/shear. This finding is in line with the study conducted In Northwest Ethiopia and Thailand [11, 12].

Patient’s position change was also the other independent variable which was significantly associated with PU. Those patients who did not have their position changed were 10.42 times more likely to develop PU than those who had their position changed every 2–3 h. This finding was comparable with the result by an International review of PU prevention [26].

Conclusion and recommendation

The prevalence of PU was high. LHS, activity, friction/shear, and changed position were significantly associated. We recommend for the Ministry of Health to establish a better system to early identify risk factors towards the occurrence of PU and implement different tools like Braden scale pressure ulcer risk assessment tool and prepare guideline on how to handle patients on PU. For healthcare provider’s contribution is vital in the prevention of PU for admitted patients. Therefore, it would better to strive for standards of care in the health care system. Also, for researchers conducting a prospective study to examine the incidence and associated factors of PU for hospitalized patients.

Limitation

Firstly, the cross-sectional design of this study limits our ability to make causal inferences. Second, time and resource limitation for not doing a prospective study. Thirdly, a patient who already developed a PU was not grouped on their disease type.