Emad AlShwaimi1, Majdy Idrees2, Zeina Berri3, Haytham El-Sakka4, Omar Kujan5. 1. Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (University of Dammam), Dammam, Saudi Arabia. 2. Private Dental Sector, Manama, Bahrain. 3. Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Al-Farabi College for Dentistry and Nursing, Al-Farabi Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 4. UWA Dental School, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Washington, Australia. 5. UWA Dental School, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Washington, Australia, omar.kujan@uwa.edu.au.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional survey aimed to assess the knowledge of dentists and dental assistants practicing in Saudi Arabia regarding diabetes mellitus (DM) and periodontal diseases. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We used a pretested, closed-ended, multiple-choice questionnaire covering 2 principal sections: the assessment of previous educational training and practice, and the knowledge and scientific background regarding DM and periodontal diseases. The responses were grouped using the Likert-type scale. RESULTS: The questionnaire showed a high reliability value of 0.805 as determined by a Cronbach's α. Out of 365 subjects who were initially interviewed, 239 subjects participated (response rate 65.5%): general dentists (45.6%) and dental hygienists and assistants (54.4%). Of the participating dentists, 70.4% were males; in contrast, 87.7% of dental assistants were female. Eighty-five percent of the participants strongly agreed that evidence supports the association between periodontal diseases and DM. Remarkably, dental assistants (78%) agreed more than dentists (68.5%) that diabetic patients with periodontal conditions would have worse glycemic control compared to diabetic patients with no periodontal diseases. Seventy-five percent of the respondents were confident about performing oral health screening for diabetic patients. Significantly more dental assistants showed their desire to expand their practice to include oral health screening (85%) and education compared to dentists (74%). CONCLUSIONS: Both dentists and dental assistants in Saudi Arabia revealed a satisfactory knowledge level regarding the periodontal disease-diabetes interactions with no significant difference between the two groups. Further studies are recommended to assess the attitude of dental care providers while dealing with diabetic patients.
OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional survey aimed to assess the knowledge of dentists and dental assistants practicing in Saudi Arabia regarding diabetes mellitus (DM) and periodontal diseases. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We used a pretested, closed-ended, multiple-choice questionnaire covering 2 principal sections: the assessment of previous educational training and practice, and the knowledge and scientific background regarding DM and periodontal diseases. The responses were grouped using the Likert-type scale. RESULTS: The questionnaire showed a high reliability value of 0.805 as determined by a Cronbach's α. Out of 365 subjects who were initially interviewed, 239 subjects participated (response rate 65.5%): general dentists (45.6%) and dental hygienists and assistants (54.4%). Of the participating dentists, 70.4% were males; in contrast, 87.7% of dental assistants were female. Eighty-five percent of the participants strongly agreed that evidence supports the association between periodontal diseases and DM. Remarkably, dental assistants (78%) agreed more than dentists (68.5%) that diabeticpatients with periodontal conditions would have worse glycemic control compared to diabeticpatients with no periodontal diseases. Seventy-five percent of the respondents were confident about performing oral health screening for diabeticpatients. Significantly more dental assistants showed their desire to expand their practice to include oral health screening (85%) and education compared to dentists (74%). CONCLUSIONS: Both dentists and dental assistants in Saudi Arabia revealed a satisfactory knowledge level regarding the periodontal disease-diabetes interactions with no significant difference between the two groups. Further studies are recommended to assess the attitude of dental care providers while dealing with diabeticpatients.
Authors: V Bowyer; P Sutcliffe; R Ireland; A Lindenmeyer; R Gadsby; M Graveney; J Sturt; J Dale Journal: Br Dent J Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 1.626
Authors: Katia L Costa; Zuila A Taboza; Gisele B Angelino; Virginia R Silveira; Renan Montenegro; Alex N Haas; Rodrigo O Rego Journal: J Periodontol Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 6.993
Authors: T C Alba-Loureiro; C D Munhoz; J O Martins; G A Cerchiaro; C Scavone; R Curi; P Sannomiya Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 2.590
Authors: Hon K Yuen; Bethany J Wolf; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Kathryn M Magruder; Carlos F Salinas; Steven D London Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Nidhi Arora; Panos N Papapanou; Michael Rosenbaum; David R Jacobs; Moïse Desvarieux; Ryan T Demmer Journal: J Clin Periodontol Date: 2014-05-25 Impact factor: 8.728
Authors: Asma'a A Faden; Anas B Alsalhani; Majdy M Idrees; Mohammed A Alshehri; Mohammad Z Nassani; Omar B Kujan Journal: Saudi Med J Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Faisal A Alonaizan; Khalid Almas; Muhammad Ashraf Nazir; Dalal Almazrou; Manar Alzamil; Mohammed A AlOlyani Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2022-02-04