Literature DB >> 30496691

The Dark Side of Information Proliferation.

Thomas T Hills1.   

Abstract

There are well-understood psychological limits on our capacity to process information. As information proliferation-the consumption and sharing of information-increases through social media and other communications technology, these limits create an attentional bottleneck, favoring information that is more likely to be searched for, attended to, comprehended, encoded, and later reproduced. In information-rich environments, this bottleneck influences the evolution of information via four forces of cognitive selection, selecting for information that is belief-consistent, negative, social, and predictive. Selection for belief-consistent information leads balanced information to support increasingly polarized views. Selection for negative information amplifies information about downside risks and crowds out potential benefits. Selection for social information drives herding, impairs objective assessments, and reduces exploration for solutions to hard problems. Selection for predictive patterns drives overfitting, the replication crisis, and risk seeking. This article summarizes the negative implications of these forces of cognitive selection and presents eight warnings that represent severe pitfalls for the naive "informavore," accelerating extremism, hysteria, herding, and the proliferation of misinformation.

Keywords:  attention economics; evolution; misinformation; social proof; social risk amplification

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30496691     DOI: 10.1177/1745691618803647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  12 in total

1.  Information overload for (bounded) rational agents.

Authors:  Emmanuel M Pothos; Stephan Lewandowsky; Irina Basieva; Albert Barque-Duran; Katy Tapper; Andrei Khrennikov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A brief history of risk.

Authors:  Ying Li; Thomas Hills; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-06-08

3.  Limited not lazy: a quasi-experimental secondary analysis of evidence quality evaluations by those who hold implausible beliefs.

Authors:  Kristy A Martire; Bethany Growns; Agnes S Bali; Bronte Montgomery-Farrer; Stephanie Summersby; Mariam Younan
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-12-11

4.  Dense and influential core promotion of daily viral information spread in political echo chambers.

Authors:  Kimitaka Asatani; Hiroko Yamano; Takeshi Sakaki; Ichiro Sakata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The Challenge of Human Psychology to Effective Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Petr Houdek; Petr Koblovský; Marek Vranka
Journal:  Society       Date:  2021-04-30

6.  LOCO: The 88-million-word language of conspiracy corpus.

Authors:  Alessandro Miani; Thomas Hills; Adrian Bangerter
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-10-25

7.  Neutral bots probe political bias on social media.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Diogo Pacheco; Kai-Cheng Yang; Filippo Menczer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Digital media and misinformation: An outlook on multidisciplinary strategies against manipulation.

Authors:  Danielle Caled; Mário J Silva
Journal:  J Comput Soc Sci       Date:  2021-05-27

9.  Crisis Communication and Public Perception of COVID-19 Risk in the Era of Social Media.

Authors:  Kristen Malecki; Julie A Keating; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Dogmatism manifests in lowered information search under uncertainty.

Authors:  Lion Schulz; Max Rollwage; Raymond J Dolan; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.