Devyani Deshpande1, Shashikant Srivastava1, Eric Nuermberger2,3, Thearith Koeuth1, Katherine R Martin1, Kayle N Cirrincione1, Pooi S Lee1, Tawanda Gumbo1,4. 1. Center for Infectious Diseases Research and Experimental Therapeutics, Baylor Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 2. Center for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine. 3. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Observatory, South Africa.
Abstract
Background: Children are often neglected during early development of antituberculosis agents, and most receive treatment after it is first tested in adults. However, very young children have tuberculosis that differs in many respects from adult cavitary pneumonia and could have different toxicity profiles to drugs. Linezolid is effective against intracellular tuberculosis, a common manifestation in young children. However, linezolid has considerable toxicity due to inhibition of mitochondrial enzymes. Tedizolid could be a replacement if it shows equal efficacy and reduced toxicity. Methods: We performed tedizolid dose-effect studies in the hollow fiber system model of intracellular tuberculosis. We measured linezolid concentrations, colony-forming units (CFU), time-to-positivity, and monocyte viability and performed RNA sequencing on infected cells collected from repetitive sampling of each system. We also compared efficacy of tedizolid vs linezolid and vs tedizolid-moxifloxacin combination. Results: There was no downregulation of mitochondrial enzyme genes, with a tedizolid 0-24 hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) of up to 90 mg*h/L. Instead, high exposures led to increased mitochondrial gene expression and monocyte survival. The AUC0-24 to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio associated with 80% of maximal bacterial kill (EC80) was 184 by CFU/mL (r2 = 0.96) and 189 by time-to-positivity (r2 = 0.99). Tedizolid EC80 killed 4.0 log10 CFU/mL higher than linezolid EC80. The tedizolid-moxifloxacin combination had a bacterial burden elimination rate constant of 0.27 ± 0.05 per day. Conclusions: Tedizolid demonstrated better efficacy than linezolid, without the mitochondrial toxicity gene or cytotoxicity signatures encountered with linezolid. Tedizolid-moxifloxacin combination had a high bacterial elimination rate.
Background: Children are often neglected during early development of antituberculosis agents, and most receive treatment after it is first tested in adults. However, very young children have tuberculosis that differs in many respects from adult cavitary pneumonia and could have different toxicity profiles to drugs. Linezolid is effective against intracellular tuberculosis, a common manifestation in young children. However, linezolid has considerable toxicity due to inhibition of mitochondrial enzymes. Tedizolid could be a replacement if it shows equal efficacy and reduced toxicity. Methods: We performed tedizolid dose-effect studies in the hollow fiber system model of intracellular tuberculosis. We measured linezolid concentrations, colony-forming units (CFU), time-to-positivity, and monocyte viability and performed RNA sequencing on infected cells collected from repetitive sampling of each system. We also compared efficacy of tedizolid vs linezolid and vs tedizolid-moxifloxacin combination. Results: There was no downregulation of mitochondrial enzyme genes, with a tedizolid 0-24 hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) of up to 90 mg*h/L. Instead, high exposures led to increased mitochondrial gene expression and monocyte survival. The AUC0-24 to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio associated with 80% of maximal bacterial kill (EC80) was 184 by CFU/mL (r2 = 0.96) and 189 by time-to-positivity (r2 = 0.99). Tedizolid EC80 killed 4.0 log10 CFU/mL higher than linezolid EC80. The tedizolid-moxifloxacin combination had a bacterial burden elimination rate constant of 0.27 ± 0.05 per day. Conclusions: Tedizolid demonstrated better efficacy than linezolid, without the mitochondrial toxicity gene or cytotoxicity signatures encountered with linezolid. Tedizolid-moxifloxacin combination had a high bacterial elimination rate.
Authors: Seth T Housman; J Samuel Pope; John Russomanno; Edward Salerno; Eric Shore; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: An S De Vriese; Rudy Van Coster; Joel Smet; Sara Seneca; Andrew Lovering; Lindsey L Van Haute; Ludo J Vanopdenbosch; Jean-Jacques Martin; Chantal Ceuterick-de Groote; Stefaan Vandecasteele; Johan R Boelaert Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-03-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Tawanda Gumbo; Arnold Louie; Mark R Deziel; Linda M Parsons; Max Salfinger; George L Drusano Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2004-09-24 Impact factor: 5.226