Literature DB >> 30496291

Correction: Palliative care team consultation and quality of death and dying in a university hospital: A secondary analysis of a prospective study.

Arianne Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, Frederika E Witkamp, Lia van Zuylen, Carin C D van der Rijt, Agnes van der Heide.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201191.].

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30496291      PMCID: PMC6264806          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


In Tables 6 and 7, the p-values presented did not reflect the Holm Bonferroni correction. The text and conclusions of the article are based on the corrected p-values. Please see the corrected Tables 6 and 7 here.
Table 6

End of life discussions, awareness and life closure according to relatives (N = 175).

Without PCT consultationn (%)With PCT consultationn(%)X2P value
Patient had discussed preferences for medical treatment at end of life with somebody.Yes57 (62)59 (82)7.790.070
No35 (38)13 (18)
Missing65
Patient had discussed preferences for medical treatment at end of life with familyYes58 (59)60 (78)6.890.117
No40 (41)17 (22)
Missing00
Patient had discussed preferences for medical care at end of life with a GPYes15 (16)27 (38)9.520.030
No77 (84)45 (62)
Missing65
Patient had discussed preferences for medical care at end of life with a medical specialistYes24 (26)27 (38)2.460.468
No68 (74)45 (62)
Missing65
Patient had discussed preferences for medical care at end of life with a nurseYes6 (7)9 (13)1.740.564
No86 (93)63 (87)
Missing65
Preferences were met?Yes12 (48)13 (52)0.1081.000
No45 (52)42 (48)
Missing4122
Would the relatives preferred to have more discussions on preferences and medical treatment?Yes23 (26)23 (32)1.021.000
No48 (53)33 (46)
DK*19 (21)15 (21)
Missing86
Patient was aware of imminent deathYes20 (22)28 (39)7.020.270
No60 (64)32 (45)
DK13 (14)11 (16)
Missing34
At what moment was the patient aware of imminent death?>72h7 (13)20 (35)7.950.216
<72h32 (59)28 (49)
DK15 (28)9 (16)
Missing4420
Patient was able to say goodbyeYes38 (40)39 (56)8.030.216
No55 (59)27(39)
DK1 (1)4 (6)
Missing47
Patient was at peace with imminent deathYes34 (38)42 (57)6.810.297
No28 (31)18 (25)
DK28 (31)13 (18)
Missing84
Relative was aware of imminent deathYes37 (40)43 (59)6.010.322
No53 (58)28 (38)
DK2 (2)2 (3)
Missing64
At what moment was the relative aware of imminent death?>72h20 (32)30 (48)3.350.335
<72h42 (68)32 (52)
Missing3615
Relative said goodbye to patientYes44 (46)44 (62)4.000.322
No51 (54)27 (38)
Missing36
Relative was present at moment of deathYes71 (75)63 (88)4.210.320
No24 (25)9 (12)
Missing35

† P-values were calculated using the Holm-Bonferroni method

*DK = don’t know

Table 7

Hospital care in the last days of life according to relatives (N = 175).

Without PCT consultationn (%)With PCT consultationn(%)X2P value
Efforts to alleviate symptoms and problems last 3 days before death were sufficientYes51 (56)43 (61)3.891.000
No7 (8)9 (13)
Partly20 (22)8 (11)
NA*10 (11)8 (11)
DK**3 (3)3 (4)
Missing76
Efforts to alleviate symptoms and problems last 24 hours before death were sufficientYes62 (77)48 (71)0.531.000
No9 (10)7 (10)
Partly13 (15)10 (15)
DK2 (2)3 (4)
Missing129
Social support the last 3 days before death were sufficientYes49 (54)32 (46)4.281.000
No11 (12)15 (21)
Partly12 (13)13 (19)
NA11 (12)7 (10)
DK7 (8)3 (4)
Missing87
Social support the last 24 hours before death were sufficientYes54 (61)43 (66)3.661.000
No10 (11)10 (15)
Partly17 (19)11 (17)
DK7 (8)1 (2)
Missing1012
In the last days of life, patient participated sufficiently in decision making on medical treatmentYes45 (52)34 (50)0.141.000
No14 (16)10 (15)
Sometimes15 (17)13 (19)
DK14 (16)11 (16)
Missing109
In the last days of life, relative participated sufficiently in decision making on medical treatmentYes65 (74)47(67)0.971.000
No17 (19)18 (26)
DK6 (7)5 (7)
Missing107
Did the relative receive sufficient information in the last days before death?Yes66 (73)51 (72)1.601.000
Too much1 (1)3 (4)
Too little23 (26)17 (24)
Missing86
Information that was given to the relative was understandableYes71 (79)49 (68)2.711.000
No1 (1)1 (1)
Partly12 (13)13 (18)
No info6 (7)9 (13)
Missing85
Relatives were informed about imminent deathYes53 (58)46 (64)0.541.000
No38 (42)26 (36)
Missing75
Opportunity to discuss personal or religious preferences was sufficientYes46 (53)45 (64)6.5360.532
No15 (17)16 (23)
DK26 (30)9 (13)
Missing117
Attention was paid to personal or religious preferencesYes47 (51)40 (56)2.601.000
No7 (8)10 (14)
DK35 (39)21 (29)
Missing96
Attention to preferred rituals at the moment of death was sufficientYes40 (49)36 (58)3.671.000
No8 (10)10 (16)
DK34 (41)17 (27)
Missing1614
Affirmation of the patient as a whole person was sufficientYes56 (61)40 (58)2.021.000
No8 (9)6 (9)
Partly19 (12)12 (17)
DK8 (9)11 (16)
Missing78
Attention to wishes of patient and relatives in the days before death was sufficientYes63 (70)55 (77)2.301.000
No7 (8)6 (9)
Partly11 (12)7 (10)
DK9 (10)3 (4)
Missing86

† P-values were calculated using the Holm-Bonferroni method

*NA = Not applicable

** Don’t know

† P-values were calculated using the Holm-Bonferroni method *DK = don’t know † P-values were calculated using the Holm-Bonferroni method *NA = Not applicable ** Don’t know
  1 in total

1.  Palliative care team consultation and quality of death and dying in a university hospital: A secondary analysis of a prospective study.

Authors:  Arianne Brinkman-Stoppelenburg; Frederika E Witkamp; Lia van Zuylen; Carin C D van der Rijt; Agnes van der Heide
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.