Literature DB >> 30488833

A study on the impact of patient-related parameters in the ability to spare parotid glands by intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Bhanu Prakash Bandlamudi1, Krishna Sharan1, Prahlad Hiremagalur Yathiraj1, Anshul Singh1, Anusha Reddy1, Donald Jerard Fernandes1, Vidyasagar Mamidipudi Srinivasa1.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to study the effect of geometric- and patient-related variables in achieving the desired dose-volume constraints to parotid for patients undergoing definitive/adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study considered HNSCC patients who underwent IMRT at our center between 2009 and 2014. Patients' details and dose-volume parameters were collected, and correlated with dose to parotids using Pearson's correlation test.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were found to be eligible. Oral primary predominated (37.3%) and 53 (79%) had locally advanced disease. The parotid volume (PV) had no impact on mean dose. There was a negative linear correlation between the ratio (Parotid-planning target volume [PTV] overlap)/PV and mean dose to the whole parotid (y = 1.14-0.011×; R2 = 0.509; P = 0.001), suggesting that a ratio of 0.7 resulted in mean dose ≥ 40 Gy and potentially irreversible xerostomia. No association was found between site of primary and parotid dose, but node-positive (N+) patients received significantly higher dose compared to N0 patients (34.5 Gy vs. 29.5 Gy; P = 0.001). N + patients persisted to receive higher dose even when T stage was accounted for (32.5 Gy vs. 28.9 Gy for </= T2, 35.4 Gy vs. 30.1 Gy for > T2; P = 0.003). On the last follow-up, 35 patients (52%) had >/=Grade II xerostomia. Average mean dose to combined PV was higher in patients with > grade I xerostomia compared to patients with </=Grade I (35 Gy vs. 29 Gy; P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The degree of PTV overlap with parotid (≥30%) and N + disease are the strongest predictors of poor parotid sparing by IMRT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dosimetry; intensity modulated radiotherapy; xerostomia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30488833     DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_362_16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther        ISSN: 1998-4138            Impact factor:   1.805


  2 in total

1.  A Model-Based Method for Assessment of Salivary Gland and Planning Target Volume Dosimetry in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Planning on Head-and-Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Honglai Zhang; Yijian Cao; Jeffrey Antone; Adam C Riegel; Maged Ghaly; Louis Potters; Abolghassem Jamshidi
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

2.  The Role of Patient- and Treatment-Related Factors and Early Functional Imaging in Late Radiation-Induced Xerostomia in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Simona Marzi; Alessia Farneti; Laura Marucci; Pasqualina D'Urso; Antonello Vidiri; Emma Gangemi; Giuseppe Sanguineti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.