Literature DB >> 30488449

Biofilm model systems for root canal disinfection: a literature review.

R C D Swimberghe1, T Coenye2, R J G De Moor1, M A Meire1.   

Abstract

The aim of this review was to present an overview of laboratory root canal biofilm model systems described in the endodontic literature and to critically appraise the various factors that constitute these models. The electronic databases MEDLINE, Web of Science and EMBASE were searched up to and including December 2016 to identify laboratory studies using endodontic biofilm models. The following search terms were used in various combinations: biofilm, root canal, in vitro, endodontic, bacteria, root canal infection model, colony-forming unit. Only English papers from journals with an impact factor were selected. The records were screened by two reviewers, and full-text articles were assessed according to pre-defined criteria. The following data were extracted from the included studies: the microbial composition of the biofilm, the substrate, growth conditions, validation and quantification. Seventy-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. In the majority (86%) of the studies, a monospecies biofilm was cultured. In two studies, a dual-species biofilm was grown; others cultivated a multispecies biofilm, containing at least three species. Enterococcus faecalis was the most frequently used test species (in 79% of all studies, 92% of the monospecies studies). Four studies used an inoculum derived directly from the oral cavity. Human dentine was the most frequently used substratum (88% of the studies). Incubation times differed considerably, ranging from one to seventy days. The most common quantification method (in 87% of the studies) was bacterial culturing, followed by microscopy techniques. The variation in laboratory root canal biofilm model systems is notable. Because of substantial variation in experimental parameters, it is difficult to compare results between studies. This demonstrates the need for a more standardized approach and a validated endodontic biofilm model.
© 2018 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biofilm; model system; root canal; systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30488449     DOI: 10.1111/iej.13050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  25 in total

1.  Investigating the Antibacterial Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation, Photodynamic Therapy and Their Combination on Root Canal Disinfection.

Authors:  Zohreh Ahangari; Mohammad Asnaashari; Nazila Akbarian Rad; Mehdi Shokri; Saranaz Azari-Marhabi; Negin Asnaashari
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-25

2.  Multispecies biofilm removal by a multisonic irrigation system in mandibular molars.

Authors:  Hernán Coaguila-Llerena; Ronald Ordinola-Zapata; Christopher Staley; Matthew Dietz; Ruoqiong Chen; Gisele Faria
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Disruption of Enterococcus Faecalis biofilms using individual and plasma polymer encapsulated D-amino acids.

Authors:  Dunia Khider; Giampiero Rossi-Fedele; Tracy Fitzsimmons; Krasimir Vasilev; Peter S Zilm
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Can Probiotics Emerge as Effective Therapeutic Agents in Apical Periodontitis? A Review.

Authors:  Gaurav Kumar; Sanjay Tewari; John Tagg; Michael Leonidas Chikindas; Igor V Popov; Santosh Kumar Tiwari
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Effect of calcium hydroxide on morphology and physicochemical properties of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm.

Authors:  Mahere Momenijavid; Himen Salimizand; Aazam Korani; Omid Dianat; Bijan Nouri; Rashid Ramazanzadeh; Amjad Ahmadi; Jino Rostamipour; Mohammad Rastegar Khosravi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals.

Authors:  Wajih Hage; Roeland J G De Moor; Désirée Hajj; Germain Sfeir; Dolla K Sarkis; Carla Zogheib
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-27

7.  An Insight into Advanced Approaches for Photosensitizer Optimization in Endodontics-A Critical Review.

Authors:  Patrícia Diogo; M Amparo F Faustino; M Graça P M S Neves; Paulo J Palma; Isabel P Baptista; Teresa Gonçalves; João Miguel Santos
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2019-09-30

8.  Evaluation of the anti-biofilm effect of poloxamer-based thermoreversible gel of silver nanoparticles as a potential medication for root canal therapy.

Authors:  Ting Liu; Aerdake Aman; Muniremu Ainiwaer; Liang Ding; Fei Zhang; Qingang Hu; Yuxian Song; Yanhong Ni; Xuna Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Chemical efficacy of several NaOCl concentrations on biofilms of different architecture: new insights on NaOCl working mechanisms.

Authors:  X Petridis; F H Busanello; M V R So; R J B Dijkstra; P K Sharma; L W M van der Sluis
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 5.264

Review 10.  Inspection of the Microbiota in Endodontic Lesions.

Authors:  Mario Dioguardi; Giovanni Di Gioia; Gaetano Illuzzi; Claudia Arena; Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio; Giorgia Apollonia Caloro; Khrystyna Zhurakivska; Iolanda Adipietro; Giuseppe Troiano; Lorenzo Lo Muzio
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.