| Literature DB >> 30488034 |
Gianna Kühn1, Kathrin Pallauf1, Carsten Schulz2,3, Marc Birringer4, Beatriz Diaz-Rica5, Sonia de Pascual-Teresa5, Gerald Rimbach1.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate whether resveratrol (RSV) and its microbial metabolites dihydro-resveratrol (DHR) and lunularin (LUN) affected fatty acid metabolism and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n3-PUFA) synthesis in cultured hepatocytes. To this end, cultured human HepG2 hepatocytes were treated with non-toxic concentrations of these polyphenols (40 μM) and Δ5- and Δ6-desaturase (FADS1 and FADS2, respectively) expression was measured. Resveratrol induced both genes but DHR and LUN showed no effect. Co-incubation of RSV with α-linolenic acid (ALA) also induced FADS1 and FADS2 expression. Moreover, transcription of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A and fatty acid synthase expression was increased, indicating induction of β-oxidation and fatty acid synthesis, respectively. Using gas chromatography to measure fatty acid levels, we observed the impact of RSV with and without ALA treatment on fatty acid composition. However, RSV reduced unsaturated while increasing saturated fatty acid levels. We found lower amounts of monounsaturated fatty acids (16:1n-7c, 18:1n-9c, 18:1n7c, and 20:1n-9) and n3-PUFA docosahexaenoic acid whereas unsaturated fatty acid levels, especially of stearic acid, were elevated. Of interest, once we co-incubated the cells with RSV together with bovine serum albumin, we found no differences in gene expression compared to cells without RSV treatment. Although we found no positive effect of RSV on n3-PUFA synthesis, the stilbene could possibly prevent cellular stress by decreasing unsaturated fatty acid levels.Entities:
Keywords: HepG2 cells; desaturase; omega-3; resveratrol; stearic acid
Year: 2018 PMID: 30488034 PMCID: PMC6246710 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Hepatic endogenous synthesis of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) via fatty acid desaturases 1 and 2 (FADS1 and FADS2, respectively) (A,B) and test compounds used in the study (C–E). (A) step of omega-6 PUFA synthesis regulated via FADS2; (B) steps of the two possible pathways of omega-3 PUFA synthesis from α-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3/ALA). α-linolenic acid is either first desaturated by fatty acid desaturase 6 (FADS2) and then elongated by elongase of very long-chain fatty acids 5 (ELOVL5) or first elongated and then desaturated before being desaturated to eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5n-3/EPA). Synthesis of docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n-3/DHA) requires further elongation and desaturation and a final peroxisomal step of β-oxidation (8–10). (C–E) Chemical structures of resveratrol, dihydro-resveratrol and lunularin. Green marking indicates potentially responsible OH-groups for induction of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha.
Sequences of primers used in this study.
| GAPDH—Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | CAATGACCCCTTCATTGACC | GATCTCGCTCCTGGAAGATG |
| FADS1—fatty acid desaturase 1 | GATGCCTCGACACAATTACC | CTGCCCTGACTCCTTTAGTG |
| FADS2—fatty acid desaturase 2 | ACAAGGATCCCGATGTGAAC | TTCGTGCTGGTGATTGTAGG |
| CPT1—carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A | CTGCTTTACAGGCGCAAACT | TCATGTGCTGGATGGTGTCT |
| FASN—fatty acid synthase | AAGGACCTGTCTAGGTTTGATGC | TGGCTTCATAGGTGACTTCCA |
Figure 2Effects of treating HepG2 for 24 h with 40 μM of resveratrol (RSV), lunularin (LUN) or dihydro-resveratrol (DHR) on the mRNA level of (A) fatty acid desaturase 1 (FADS1) and (B) fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2). Values are relative to the solvent control DMSO set to be 1.0. Expression levels were normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and are shown as means + standard error (n = 3; * P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001; with post-hoc multiple comparison test of Dunnett). Effects of treating HepG2 for 24 h with 40 μM of resveratrol on protein levels of FADS1 and FADS2 (C), analyzed by Western Blotting analysis. Protein levels were normalized to the housekeeping protein GAPDH.
Figure 3Effects of treating HepG2 for 24 h with 40 μM of resveratrol and 50 μM α-linolenic acid (ALA) in ethanol (EtOH) or 0.125% EtOH + 0.04% DMSO solvent control on (A) fatty acid desaturase 1 (FADS1), (B) fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2), (C) carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A (CPT1), and (D) fatty acid synthase (FASN) mRNA levels. Values are relative to DMSO + EtOH control, which was set to be 1.0. Expression levels were normalized to the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). n = 3; mean + standard error. Values with different superscript letters differ significantly with p-values < 0.05; with post-hoc multiple comparison test of Tukey. Effects of treating HepG2 for 24 h with 40 μM of resveratrol and 50 μM ALA in EtOH or EtOH + DMSO solvent control on protein levels of FADS1, FADS2, CPT1, or FASN (E-H), analyzed by Western Blotting analysis. Protein levels were normalized to the housekeeping protein GAPDH.
Fatty acid composition (in % of total fatty acid methyl esters) of HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with 40 μM of resveratrol (RSV) and 50 μM of α-linolenic acid (ALA) dissolved in ethanol (EtOH) or solvent control EtOH + DMSO.
| 14:0 | 2.08 ± 0.28 | 2.07 ± 0.22 | 2.09 ± 0.11 | 1.84 ± 0.20 |
| 16:0 | 21.28 ± 0.33 | 23.28 ± 0.51 | 21.99 ± 0.79 | 24.96 ± 4.66 |
| 20:0 | 0.35 ± 0.06 | 0.55 ± 0.14 | 0.32 ± 0.08 | 1.08 ± 0.97 |
| 16:1n-7 | 8.61 ± 0.41a | 5.37 ± 0.24b | 7.59 ± 0.60c | 4.08 ± 0.67d |
| 18:1n-9c | 28.13 ± 0.93a | 24.86 ± 0.24b | 24.42 ± 2.08b | 20.38 ± 2.77c |
| 18:1n-7c | 17.70 ± 1.13a | 13.45 ± 0.61b | 13.96 ± 1.71b | 11.00 ± 2.47c |
| 20:1n-9 | 1.86 ± 0.17a | 1.75 ± 0.05a | 1.47 ± 0.13b | 1.42 ± 0.23b |
| 18:2n-6c | 1.33 ± 0.16ac | 1.41 ± 0.11ac | 1.21 ± 0.08b | 1.74 ± 0.17c |
| 18:3n-3 | nd | nd | 3.03 ± 1.88a | 6.76 ± 1.34b |
| 20:4n-6 | 3.67 ± 0.25ab | 3.81 ± 0.26a | 3.27 ± 0.21ab | 3.11 ± 0.47b |
| 20:4n-3 | nd | nd | 0.77 ± 0.12 | nd |
| 22:5n-3 | 0.59 ± 0.08ad | 0.77 ± 0.16bd | 1.02 ± 0.07c | 0.69 ± 0.10d |
| Sum PUFA | 9.65 ± 2.43a | 10.13 ± 1.42a | 16.00 ± 5.15b | 15.34 ± 1.63b |
| EPA/DHA | nv | nv | 0.68 ± 0.08 | nv |
| ALA/LA | nv | nv | 2.51 ± 1.40a | 4.99 ± 1.05b |
n = 3; mean ± standard deviation. Values with different superscript letters within one row significantly differ with p-values < 0.05 with post-hoc multiple comparison test of Tukey. SFA: saturated fatty acids; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids; nd: not detectable (values below detection limits); nv: no value (due to values below detection limits). Bold values indicate most important significant findings.
Fatty acid composition (in % of total fatty acid methyl esters) of HepG2 cells treated for 48 h with 40 μM of resveratrol (RSV) and 50 μM of α-linolenic acid (ALA) dissolved in ethanol (EtOH) or solvent control EtOH + DMSO.
| 14:0 | 1.97 ± 0.31 | 1.96 ± 0.20 | 2.23 ± 0.12 | 2.09 ± 0.19 |
| 16:0 | 21.27 ± 1.07a | 23.68 ± 0.84b | 22.95 ± 0.12abc | 23.22 ± 1.64c |
| 20:0 | 0.34 ± 0.13a | 0.58 ± 0.12b | 0.27 ± 0.14a | 0.62 ± 0.02b |
| 16:1n-7 | 8.33 ± 0.47a | 4.53 ± 0.24b | 7.77 ± 0.48a | 3.65 ± 0.29c |
| 18:1n-9c | 28.46 ± 1.26a | 25.09 ± 0.42b | 26.05 ± 1.39c | 21.55 ± 0.84d |
| 18:1n-7c | 19.96 ± 2.23a | 12.75 ± 0.60b | 15.87 ± 1.59b | 11.04 ± 0.74c |
| 20:1n-9 | 1.79 ± 0.05a | 1.61 ± 0.09a | 1.63 ± 0.08a | 1.34 ± 0.19b |
| 18:2n-6c | 1.15 ± 0.56a | 1.74 ± 0.68a | 0.93 ± 0.12a | 2.39 ± 1.42b |
| 18:3n-3 | 0.98 ± 0.52a | 5.36 ± 2.05b | ||
| 20:4n-6 | 2.77 ± 0.18a | 3.25 ± 0.23b | 2.59 ± 0.26b | 2.88 ± 0.24c |
| 20:4n-3 | nd | nd | 0.50 ± 0.18 | nd |
| 22:5n-3 | 0.29 ± 0.06ad | 0.61 ± 0.15b | 0.88 ± 0.16c | 0.39 ± 0.29d |
| Sum PUFA | 7.28 ± 4.51a | 9.12 ± 2.23ab | 11.83 ± 3.23b | 14.28 ± 4.76c |
| EPA/DHA | nv | nv | 0.63 ± 0.12 | nv |
| ALA/LA | nv | nv | 1.06 ± 0.44a | 2.24 ± 1.84b |
n = 3; mean ± standard deviation. Values with different superscript letters within one row significantly differ with p-values < 0.05 with post-hoc multiple comparison test of Tukey. SFA: saturated fatty acids; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids; nd: not detectable (values below detection limits); nv: no value (due to values below detection limits). Bold values indicate most important significant findings.