Literature DB >> 30487961

Massive Subcutaneous Emphysema, Pneumoperitoneum, Pneumoretroperitoneum, and Pneumoscrotum following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in a Living Liver Donor.

S Akbulut1, B Isik1, Y Karipkiz2, S Yilmaz1.   

Abstract

Despite having many advantages, living donor liver transplantation has not been adopted by western countries due to risk of nearly life-threatening complications after living donor hepatectomy (LDH). Herein, we aimed at presenting the management of a 19-year-old patient who suffered life-threatening complications after right lobe LDH. A multiple detector computed tomography (MDCT) revealed a bilioma at the cut surface of the remnant liver, for which a transhepatic drainage catheter was placed. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed to decompress biliary tract, but the biliary tract could not be cannulized due to post-precut bleeding. On the next day, extensive crepitation was detected and MDCT showed subcutaneous emphysema, pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum, and pneumoscrotum (ERCP-related duodenal perforation?). However, the patient showed significant deterioration of physical examination findings, fever, and infectious parameters, and therefore was taken to the operating room. Kocher maneuver revealed no apparent duodenal perforation. Then, a 2-mm bile duct was found open at the caudate lobe, through which bile leaked. Then, common bile duct exploration and T-tube placement were performed, followed by suture closure of the bile orifice at the caudate lobe. Massive air previously identified completely disappeared one week after the operation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary complication; Duodenal perforation; ERCP-related complication; Living donor hepatectomy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30487961      PMCID: PMC6252177     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med        ISSN: 2008-6482


INTRODUCTION

Since the first successful liver transplantation by Starzl and colleagues in 1967, liver transplantation has become a standard therapy for a variety of liver disorders including chronic liver disease, acute liver failure, metabolic liver disorders, and some liver tumors [1]. While deceased donor liver transplantation constitutes a large percentage of liver transplantation performed in western countries, the majority of liver transplantation performed in many of the Asian countries use organs procured from living donors mainly due to donor pool shortage [1, 2]. Despite having many advantages, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not been adopted by western countries due to complications of living donor hepatectomy (LDH), of which some may be fatal [3-5]. Therefore, biliary tract complications are the leading ones among most fearful complications by surgeons. Herein, we aimed at sharing the management of a healthy donor candidate’s misfortunes experienced due to biliary tract complications of LDH.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 19-year-old donor candidate (remnant volume: 30%, BMI: 26.2 kg/m2, O+) presented to our center to donate liver to her grandmother who had chronic liver failure secondary to hepatitis B. The patient underwent standard right lobe LDH. An abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) performed for post-operative fever and leukocytosis revealed a collection consistent with a bilioma in a location close to the liver cut surface (Fig 1). The patent was first put on imipenem treatment and then placed a percutaneous transhepatic bilioma drainage catheter-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC). An Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed both to decompress the biliary tract and to control biliary leak, but the procedure failed due to bleeding during sphincterotomy. One day after ERCP crepitations were noticed in the patient’s scrotum, abdominal wall, and right thigh. The signs were interpreted as a result of an iatrogenic duodenal perforation due to ERCP. A contrast-enhanced CT showed subcutaneous emphysema, pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum, and pneumoscrotum (Figs 2, 3). Therefore, a treatment protocol consisting of nasogastric decompression, fluid and electrolyte replacement, and wide spectrum antibiotics (imipenem, fluconazole, daptomycin) was started. On the third day of the treatment, the patient developed fever (38.5 °C), rise in CRP (18.9 mg/dL), leukocytosis (17,600/L) and hematemesis, and was taken to the operating room. The abdominal cavity was entered through the old incision. The Kocher maneuver was performed to check the second and third parts of the duodenum, which revealed no apparent perforation. During hilus dissection, a biliary leak was realized from a bile duct with a diameter of approximately 2 mm in the remnant caudate lobe. A cholangiogram taken by administering contrast material through the cystic canal revealed normal remnant biliary tree. A cholangiogram taken by administering contrast material through the open biliary duct in the caudate lobe showed that the contrast material passed to a small part of the caudate lobe. The bile duct in the caudate lobe was sutured. In order to decompress biliary tract effectively, common bile duct exploration with T-tube insertion were carried out. Clinical signs and symptoms dramatically improved at the post-operative period. Upon showing the absence of biliary leak in a cholangiogram taken on the 10th day, the T-tube was put under a pad and the patient was discharged (Fig 4). The T-tube was removed as no leak was observed at six-week control.
Figure 1

The axial CT image shows a collection consistent with a bilioma on the cross-sectional surface of the remnant liver

Figure 2

The coronal CT cross-section demonstrates massive subcutaneous emphysema, pneumoperitoneum and pneumoretroperitoneum

Figure 3

The axial CT image shows pneumoscrotum

Figure 4

A cholangiogram taken on the 10th post-operative day showing a non-dilated biliary tract and the absence of any biliary leak

The axial CT image shows a collection consistent with a bilioma on the cross-sectional surface of the remnant liver The coronal CT cross-section demonstrates massive subcutaneous emphysema, pneumoperitoneum and pneumoretroperitoneum The axial CT image shows pneumoscrotum A cholangiogram taken on the 10th post-operative day showing a non-dilated biliary tract and the absence of any biliary leak

DISCUSSION

Post-LDH complications can be categorized into biliary and non-biliary complications. The overall and biliary complication rates after LDH are 8.1%–50%, and 1.9%–18%, respectively [3]. There are simple wound infection and atelectasis on the one end of the spectrum of non-biliary complications and life-threatening complications such as post-operative bleeding, thromboembolism, portal vein thrombosis, severe pancreatitis, and gastrointestinal perforation on the other end [4]. Bilioma that improves spontaneously without intervention is on one end of the biliary complication scale, and biliary leaks that persist despite all sorts of invasive procedures on the other end. In a study by Braun, et. al. [3], which evaluated the outcomes of 12,653 donors suggested that biliary leaks and biliomas that cause no deterioration of clinical parameters may be followed conservatively without performing any invasive treatment such as (ERCP, PTC). On the other hand, biliary strictures that are more rarely encountered mostly require ERCP and stenting [4]. It is an established fact that the ERCP used for complication management also causes its own complications. Although there exist several studies reporting complications like pancreatitis, bleeding, and perforation secondary to post-liver transplantation ERCP, no ERCP-related complication has ever been reported to occur in living liver donors [6]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of ERCP-related perforation in the literature. In conclusion, this case report demonstrates how completely healthy living hepatic donors may suffer life-threatening complications. The timing of complication management is as important as its mode in such cases.
  6 in total

1.  Perioperative complications after live-donor hepatectomy.

Authors:  Erin C Hall; Brian J Boyarsky; Neha A Deshpande; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Jonathan C Berger; Nabil N Dagher; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 2.  Biliary complications following living donor hepatectomy.

Authors:  Hillary J Braun; Nancy L Ascher; Garrett R Roll; John P Roberts
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.943

3.  Outcome of donor biliary complications following living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Hyun Young Woo; In Seok Lee; Jae Hyuck Chang; Seung Bae Youn; Si Hyun Bae; Jong Young Choi; Ho Jong Chun; Young Kyoung You; Dong Goo Kim; Seung Kew Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.884

4.  Hepatic Venous Outflow Obstruction After Living-Donor Liver Transplant: Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Suleyman Koc; Sami Akbulut; Vural Soyer; Mehmet Yilmaz; Bora Barut; Ramazan Kutlu; Sezai Yilmaz
Journal:  Exp Clin Transplant       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 0.945

5.  Live donor partial hepatectomy for liver transplantation: is there a learning curve?

Authors:  R F Saidi; N Elias; D S Ko; T Kawai; J Markmann; S Feng; A B Cosimi; M Hertl
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2010

6.  ERCP-related complication is not the only cause of GI bleeding in post-liver transplantation patients: A case report.

Authors:  Zhen Ding; Xue-Lian Tang; Rong Lin; Chaoqun Han; Jun Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.