Literature DB >> 30486332

Health Literacy in Context.

Don Nutbeam1, Diane Levin-Zamir2,3, Gill Rowlands4.   

Abstract

Health literacy has been defined and conceptualized in multiple ways, but almost all definitions have similar core elements describing the personal skills that enable individuals to obtain, understand, and use information to make decisions and take actions that will have an impact on their health. [...].

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30486332      PMCID: PMC6313523          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15122657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


Health literacy has been defined and conceptualized in multiple ways, but almost all definitions have similar core elements describing the personal skills that enable individuals to obtain, understand, and use information to make decisions and take actions that will have an impact on their health. These health literacy skills are not restricted in their application to personal behaviour, but can be applied to the full range of determinants of health (personal, social, and environmental). To date, most published health literacy research has focused on assessing and improving personal skills and abilities. More recently, a better understanding has emerged of the extent to which these skills and abilities are mediated by environmental demands and situational complexities–the context in which health literacy is developed and applied. This has led to much greater attention being given to ways of reducing the situational demands and complexity in which an individual makes a health decision. A range of models and practical strategies are emerging to help create health literate organisations. These propose strategies to reduce the environmental demands on people engaging with those organisations and health professionals. This Special Issue of the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) was conceived with the aim of examining current progress in understanding health literacy in context, looking to attract papers that improve our understanding of the mutual impact of a range of social, economic, environmental, and organisational influences on health literacy. We were especially interested in attracting submissions that reported on the relationships between physical and social environments and health literacy; interventions to reduce environmental demands and complexity, including, for example, interventions to reduce the organisational and administrative complexity of health services; health literacy interventions responsive to cultural preferences; and health literacy interventions that use the preferred media of disengaged populations. Through the call for abstracts, we received a large number and wide range of potential submissions. This response is indicative of the high level of current interest in health literacy from a very wide range of country, sectoral, and cultural perspectives. The final group of papers selected and that completed the peer review process reflects this diversity. These papers also illustrate good progress in the evolution of research in the contexts in which health literacy is developed and applied, as well as signalling some areas in which more research would be useful. The papers offer unique and original perspectives on the concept, distribution, and application of health literacy in very diverse populations. Several papers, including those by O’Hara et al. [1], König et al. [2], Schillinger et al. [3], Thomas et al. [4], and Lorini et al. [5], for example, offer cultural insights and a clear indication of the impact of social and environmental context on health literacy. Both individually and in combination, these findings have important implications for interventions designed to address the needs of different populations. Above all, they illustrate the need to routinely incorporate an understanding of “context” into the development of policies and programmes to improve health literacy in diverse populations. The papers by Trezona [6] and Geboers [7], which examine differing national policy responses to health literacy and describe a comprehensive health literacy intervention model, respectively, illustrate how policy and practice can (and should) respond to this more complete but complex understanding of health literacy. The paper by Trezona and colleagues underlines the global interest in health literacy among policy-makers, but also highlights, in turn, the gap between this public commitment and the practical actions that can be systematically applied in diverse populations. The papers by Levin-Zamir and Bertschi [8] on the application of new digital media and the creative harnessing of popular culture (as described by Schillinger et al.) offer great promise in extending the reach and customisation of communications. These contributions, along with the papers by Rademakers et al. [9], Thomas et al. [4], and Estacio et al. [10], also demonstrate that the content of communications as well as the medium is important. The collection of papers published in this Special Edition includes some that focus on clinical issues (for example, McKenna et al. [11], and Stein et al. [12]), but we have also attracted a good range of papers that are community-based, give attention to the social context in which health decisions are made, and include communication content that improves our understanding of the wider social determinants of health. However, there remains a dearth of published papers that describe health literacy interventions. The great majority of published papers still focus on personal health behaviour and practices, most often in clinical settings [13]. Whilst the progress reflected in this journal is encouraging, it is evident that more discussion and research are needed to improve our understanding of health literacy in context, and how to reduce the situational demands and complexity in which an individual makes a health decision, including how organisations and social institutions can contribute. It is our hope that this Special Issue will be a catalyst for further action and research on health literacy in context.
  13 in total

1.  Factors affecting intention to screen after being informed of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: a study in 5 European countries in 2021.

Authors:  David Ritchie; Guido Van Hal; Stephan Van den Broucke
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2022-05-23

2.  The Associations among Gender, Age, eHealth Literacy, Beliefs about Medicines and Medication Adherence among Elementary and Secondary School Teachers.

Authors:  Chiao Ling Huang; Chia Hsing Chiang; Shu Ching Yang; Fu-Zong Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Health Literacy, Socioeconomic Status and Vaccination Uptake: A Study on Influenza Vaccination in a Population-Based Sample.

Authors:  Patrizio Zanobini; Chiara Lorini; Saverio Caini; Vieri Lastrucci; Maria Masocco; Valentina Minardi; Valentina Possenti; Giovanna Mereu; Rossella Cecconi; Guglielmo Bonaccorsi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Health Literacy in the Everyday Lives of Older Adults in Greece, Hungary, and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Liesbeth de Wit; Pania Karnaki; Archontoula Dalma; Peter Csizmadia; Charlotte Salter; Andrea de Winter; Louise Meijering
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Major Stressors and Coping Strategies of Frontline Nursing Staff During the Outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2020 (COVID-19) in Alabama.

Authors:  Haneen Ali; Astin Cole; Abdulaziz Ahmed; Sa'd Hamasha; Gabriella Panos
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-12-31

6.  What About the Environment? How the Physical Activity-Related Health Competence Model Can Benefit From Health Literacy Research.

Authors:  Johannes Carl; Eva Grüne; Klaus Pfeifer
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-16

7.  Relationship between parents' health literacy and children's sleep problems in Japan.

Authors:  Sae Ono; Hiroto Ogi; Masato Ogawa; Daisuke Nakamura; Teruhiko Nakamura; Kazuhiro P Izawa
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Sustainable Behavior Change for Health Supported by Person-Tailored, Adaptive, Risk-Aware Digital Coaching in a Social Context: Study Protocol for the STAR-C Research Programme.

Authors:  Nawi Ng; Malin Eriksson; Esteban Guerrero; Carina Gustafsson; John Kinsman; Jens Lindberg; Helena Lindgren; Kristina Lindvall; Anna Sofia Lundgren; Göran Lönnberg; Klas-Göran Sahlen; Ailiana Santosa; Linda Richter Sundberg; Lars Weinehall; Patrik Wennberg
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-03-01

9.  A multisite longitudinal evaluation of patient characteristics associated with a poor response to non-surgical multidisciplinary management of low back pain in an advanced practice physiotherapist-led tertiary service.

Authors:  Shaun O'Leary; Maree Raymer; Peter Window; Patrick Swete Kelly; Darryl Lee; Linda Garsden; Rebecca Tweedy; Ben Phillips; Will O'Sullivan; Anneke Wake; Alison Smith; Sheryl Pahor; Luen Pearce; Rod McLean; David Thompson; Erica Williams; Damien Nolan; Jody Anning; Ian Seels; Daniel Wickins; Darryn Marks; Brendan Diplock; Vicki Parravicini; Linda Parnwell; Bill Vicenzino; Tracy Comans; Michelle Cottrell; Asaduzzaman Khan; Steven McPhail
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Coronavirus-Related Health Literacy: A Cross-Sectional Study during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.

Authors:  Aldo Rosano; Chiara Lorini; Brigid Unim; Robert Griebler; Chiara Cadeddu; Luca Regazzi; Daniela Galeone; Luigi Palmieri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.