Thomas Höfner1. 1. Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Mainz.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the most common urological tumour disease in men. In the localized tumour stage in combination with radiotherapy and especially in advanced metastastic disease, classical androgen deprivation remains an essential therapy. During the last 10 years, our knowledge of the cardiovascular risk of this therapy has rapidly increased. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This non-systematic review highlights the current data on cardiovascular risk in the use of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer. RESULTS: Essential publications about the cardiovascular risk of antihormonal therapy are summarised in detail. In particular, the current data on the potential cardiovascular benefit when using GnRH antagonists in androgen deprivation are discussed. The article further highlights the problem of today's antihormonal overtreatment, despite the lack of scientific evidence and points out that patient selection should be improved in the future. CONCLUSION: The multicentre prospective PRONOUNCE study has been designed to answer the question in more detail, as to whether GnRH antagonist therapy provides benefit with respect to the cardiovascular risk as compared to classical LHRH analogue androgen deprivation therapy. Thieme. All rights reserved.
INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the most common urological tumour disease in men. In the localized tumour stage in combination with radiotherapy and especially in advanced metastastic disease, classical androgen deprivation remains an essential therapy. During the last 10 years, our knowledge of the cardiovascular risk of this therapy has rapidly increased. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This non-systematic review highlights the current data on cardiovascular risk in the use of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer. RESULTS: Essential publications about the cardiovascular risk of antihormonal therapy are summarised in detail. In particular, the current data on the potential cardiovascular benefit when using GnRH antagonists in androgen deprivation are discussed. The article further highlights the problem of today's antihormonal overtreatment, despite the lack of scientific evidence and points out that patient selection should be improved in the future. CONCLUSION: The multicentre prospective PRONOUNCE study has been designed to answer the question in more detail, as to whether GnRH antagonist therapy provides benefit with respect to the cardiovascular risk as compared to classical LHRH analogue androgen deprivation therapy. Thieme. All rights reserved.