Literature DB >> 30485753

The Rotator Cuff Healing Index: A New Scoring System to Predict Rotator Cuff Healing After Surgical Repair.

Jieun Kwon1, Sae Hoon Kim2, Ye Hyun Lee1, Tae In Kim3, Joo Han Oh4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scoring systems integrating possible prognostic factors and predicting rotator cuff healing after surgical repair could provide valuable information for clinical practice.
PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic factors predictive of rotator cuff healing after surgical repair and to integrate these factors into a scoring system. STUDY
DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of 603 patients who, at least 12 months after primary rotator cuff repair by a single surgeon, had magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomographic arthrography to assess repair integrity. The mean age at the time of surgery was 60 years (range, 39-81 years), and 378 patients were women (62.7%). Previous known or suggested factors affecting cuff integrity were analyzed through univariate and multivariate analyses. Factors identified in the multivariate analysis were integrated in a scoring system based on odds ratios (ORs).
RESULTS: The overall healing failure rate was 24%. The following independent risk factors were identified in the multivariate analysis: age >70 years at the time of surgery ( P = .003, OR = 2.71), size of the tear in anteroposterior dimension ( P = .033, OR = 1.94) and retraction ( P = .000, OR = 4.56), fatty infiltration of infraspinatus exceeding grade 2 ( P = .001, OR = 2.91), low bone mineral density (T score ≤ -2.5, P = .04, OR = 1.95), and high level of work activity ( P = .036, OR = 2.18). A 15-point scoring system comprised the following: 4 points for retraction; 3 points for fatty infiltration of infraspinatus; and 2 points for anteroposterior tear size, age, bone mineral density, and work activity, weighted according to multivariate analysis ORs. Patients with ≤4 points had a 6.0% healing failure rate, and those with ≥5 and ≥10 points had 55.2% and 86.2% healing failure rates, respectively.
CONCLUSION: A numerical scoring system including significant clinical and radiological factors was designed to predict healing of the rotator cuff after surgical repair. This scoring system helped predict the adequacy of the repair and assist in deciding the appropriate treatment options.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age; bone mineral density; fatty infiltration of infraspinatus muscle; level of work activity; prognostic factors; rotator cuff tear; scoring system; tear size

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30485753     DOI: 10.1177/0363546518810763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  8 in total

1.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff tears with and without prior failed rotator cuff repair: A large-scale comparative analysis.

Authors:  Alexander J Vervaecke; Andrew D Carbone; Nicole Zubizarreta; Jashvant Poeran; Bradford O Parsons; Olivier Verborgt; Leesa M Galatz; Paul J Cagle
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-08

2.  Healing rates after rotator cuff repair for patients taking either celecoxib or placebo: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Katherine A Burns; Lynn M Robbins; Angela R LeMarr; Amber L Childress; Diane J Morton; Melissa L Wilson
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-12-08

3.  Poor Prognostic Factors in Patients With Rotator Cuff Retear.

Authors:  Dong Min Kim; In-Ho Jeon; Ha-Sol Yang; Myung Jin Shin; Jeong Hee Park; Erica Kholinne; Hyojune Kim; Dongjun Park; Kyoung Hwan Koh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-02

4.  Swiss-wide multicentre evaluation and prediction of core outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: protocol for the ARCR_Pred cohort study.

Authors:  Laurent Audigé; Heiner C C Bucher; Soheila Aghlmandi; Thomas Stojanov; David Schwappach; Sabina Hunziker; Christian Candrian; Gregory Cunningham; Holger Durchholz; Karim Eid; Matthias Flury; Bernhard Jost; Alexandre Lädermann; Beat Kaspar Moor; Philipp Moroder; Claudio Rosso; Michael Schär; Markus Scheibel; Christophe Spormann; Thomas Suter; Karl Wieser; Matthias Zumstein; Andreas M Müller
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The "Second Hit" of Repair in a Rabbit Model of Chronic Rotator Cuff Tear.

Authors:  Isabella T Wu; Michael C Gibbons; Mary C Esparza; Laura S Vasquez-Bolanos; Sydnee A Hyman; Shanelle N Dorn; Anshuman Singh; John G Lane; Donald C Fithian; Severin Ruoss; Samuel R Ward
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Relationship between the progression of posterosuperior rotator cuff tear size and shoulder abduction function: A cadaveric study via dynamic shoulder simulator.

Authors:  Liren Wang; Yuhao Kang; Haocheng Jin; Mingqi Wang; Yiyao Wei; Haihan Gao; Dingyi Shi; Suiran Yu; Guoming Xie; Jia Jiang; Jinzhong Zhao
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-27

7.  Tear Size and Stiffness Are Important Predictors of Retear: An Assessment of Factors Associated with Repair Integrity at 6 Months in 1,526 Rotator Cuff Repairs.

Authors:  Allen A Guo; Daniel J Stitz; Patrick Lam; George A C Murrell
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2022-09-26

8.  Retears of the Rotator Cuff: An Ultrasonographic Assessment During the First Postoperative Year.

Authors:  Giussepe Aguado; Daniel Vernaza Obando; Gilberto A Herrera; Alejandro Ramirez; Paulo J Llinás
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-12-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.