Literature DB >> 30485613

Managing for soil carbon sequestration: Let's get realistic.

William H Schlesinger1, Ronald Amundson2.   

Abstract

Improved soil management is increasingly pursued to ensure food security for the world's rising global population, with the ancillary benefit of storing carbon in soils to lower the threat of climate change. While all increments to soil organic matter are laudable, we suggest caution in ascribing large, potential climate change mitigation to enhanced soil management. We find that the most promising techniques, including applications of biochar and enhanced silicate weathering, collectively are not likely to balance more than 5% of annual emissions of CO2 from fossil fuel combustion.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biochar; carbon sequestration; climate change; silicate weathering; soil organic carbon

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30485613     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  7 in total

1.  Global stocks and capacity of mineral-associated soil organic carbon.

Authors:  Katerina Georgiou; Robert B Jackson; Olga Vindušková; Rose Z Abramoff; Anders Ahlström; Wenting Feng; Jennifer W Harden; Adam F A Pellegrini; H Wayne Polley; Jennifer L Soong; William J Riley; Margaret S Torn
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 2.  Novel technologies for emission reduction complement conservation agriculture to achieve negative emissions from row-crop production.

Authors:  Daniel L Northrup; Bruno Basso; Michael Q Wang; Cristine L S Morgan; Philip N Benfey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Differences in the ratio of soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and soil organic carbon (SOC) at various altitudes of Hyperalic Alisol in the Amazon region of Ecuador.

Authors:  Benito Mendoza; Jaime Béjar; Daniel Luna; Miguel Osorio; Mauro Jimenez; Jesus R Melendez
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-05-26

Review 4.  Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology.

Authors:  Alasdair J Sykes; Michael Macleod; Vera Eory; Robert M Rees; Florian Payen; Vasilis Myrgiotis; Mathew Williams; Saran Sohi; Jon Hillier; Dominic Moran; David A C Manning; Pietro Goglio; Michele Seghetta; Adrian Williams; Jim Harris; Marta Dondini; Jack Walton; Joanna House; Pete Smith
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Biophysical potential of crop residues for biochar carbon sequestration, and co-benefits, in Uganda.

Authors:  Dries Roobroeck; Rebecca Hood-Nowotny; Dianah Nakubulwa; John-Baptist Tumuhairwe; Majaliwa Jackson Gilbert Mwanjalolo; Isaac Ndawula; Bernard Vanlauwe
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Significant loss of soil inorganic carbon at the continental scale.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Song; Fei Yang; Hua-Yong Wu; Jing Zhang; De-Cheng Li; Feng Liu; Yu-Guo Zhao; Jin-Ling Yang; Bing Ju; Chong-Fa Cai; Biao Huang; Huai-Yu Long; Ying Lu; Yue-Yu Sui; Qiu-Bing Wang; Ke-Ning Wu; Feng-Rong Zhang; Ming-Kui Zhang; Zhou Shi; Wan-Zhu Ma; Gang Xin; Zhi-Ping Qi; Qing-Rui Chang; En Ci; Da-Gang Yuan; Yang-Zhu Zhang; Jun-Ping Bai; Jia-Ying Chen; Jie Chen; Yin-Jun Chen; Yun-Zhong Dong; Chun-Lan Han; Ling Li; Li-Ming Liu; Jian-Jun Pan; Fu-Peng Song; Fu-Jun Sun; Deng-Feng Wang; Tian-Wei Wang; Xiang-Hua Wei; Hong-Qi Wu; Xia Zhao; Qing Zhou; Gan-Lin Zhang
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 17.275

7.  Soil organic matter turnover rates increase to match increased inputs in grazed grasslands.

Authors:  Shane W Stoner; Alison M Hoyt; Susan Trumbore; Carlos A Sierra; Marion Schrumpf; Sebastian Doetterl; W Troy Baisden; Louis A Schipper
Journal:  Biogeochemistry       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 4.825

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.