| Literature DB >> 30485371 |
Shanshan Wan1,2, Jun Cheng2, Yanling Dong2, Lixin Xie1,2.
Abstract
To investigate the clinical characteristics, treatment, risk factors of occurrence and graft transparency of corneal epithelial defects after penetrating keratoplasty in patients with infectious keratitis. 594 patients (594 eyes) with infectious keratitis treated by penetrating keratoplasty at Shandong Eye Institute were reviewed retrospectively between January 2008 and January 2018. We investigated the demographic data, diameter and sources of graft, onset time, location, scope, time of healing and treatment of epithelial defects, as well as other postoperative complications and graft clarity. 114 of the 594 grafts (19.2%) that developed epithelial defects were included in the epithelial defects group, while the other 480 patients were classified in the non-defect group. The mean age of patients with epithelial defects was statistically greater than that of patients without epithelial defects (P = 0.006). The epithelial defects group accounted for a larger proportion of male patients (P<0.001). The proportion of patients with a graft diameter >9mm in the epithelial defect group (29.8%) was more than that in the non-defects group (16.3%) (P = 0.001). The incidence of epithelial defects significantly differed among the pathogenic causes of infectious keratitis (P = 0.002). The incidence of graft infection (21.1%, 9.2%, respectively, P<0.001) and graft dysfunction (7.9%, 2.5%, respectively, P = 0.012) in the epithelial defect group was higher than in the non-defects group. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that male sex (P = 0.001), age ≥ 60 years (P = 0.024), graft diameter >9mm (P = 0.001), bacterial (P = 0.039) and herpes simplex keratitis (P = 0.008), rheumatism (P = 0.031) and cancer treated with chemo- or radiotherapy (P = 0.032) were independent risk factors for epithelial defects. Graft clarity after epithelial defects were significantly differed between fungal and viral infections (P<0.001). We found that being an elderly male patient, a graft diameter >9 mm, bacterial and viral keratitis and systemic diseases (including rheumatism and cancer treated with chemo- or radiotherapy) were independent risk factors for postoperative epithelial defects.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30485371 PMCID: PMC6261636 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with epithelial defects after penetrating keratoplasty for infectious keratitis.
| Clinical Factors | With epithelial defects (n = 114) | Without epithelial defects (n = 480) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex No(%) | <0.001 | ||
| Male | 96(84.2) | 314(65.4) | |
| Female | 18(15.8) | 166(34.6) | |
| Age(mean±SD)years | 55.4±12.1 | 51.3±14.0 | 0.006 |
| Eye | 0.49 | ||
| Right | 63(55.3) | 248(51.7) | |
| Left | 51(44.7) | 232(48.3) | |
| Occupation | 0.60 | ||
| Indoors | 44(38.6) | 198(41.3) | |
| Outdoors | 70(61.4) | 282(58.7) | |
| Diameter of graft>9mm | 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 34(29.8) | 78(16.3) | |
| No | 80(80.2) | 402(83.7) | |
| Source of graft | 0.67 | ||
| DX | 99(86.8) | 422(87.9) | |
| Optisol | 15(13.2) | 56(12.1) | |
| Complications and outcomes | |||
| Graft rejection | 13(11.4) | 112(23.3) | 0.005 |
| Graft infection | 26(22.8) | 44(9.2) | <0.001 |
| Graft dysfunction | 9(7.9) | 12(2.5) | 0.012 |
| Repeat PK | 7(6.1) | 20(4.2) | 0.36 |
| Evisceration | 3(2.6) | 6(1.3) | 0.51 |
| Systemic diseases | |||
| Diabetes mellitus | 7(6.1) | 30(6.3) | 0.97 |
| Rheumatism | 6(5.3) | 8(1.7) | 0.035 |
| Cancer patients treated with chemo- or radiotherapy | 4(3.5) | 4(0.8) | 0.048 |
*Chi-squared test.
§Chi-squared test with continuity correction.
※Mann–Whitney U test.
#Fisher’s exact test.
Fig 1Indications for penetrating keratoplasty with and without epithelial defects.
(A) Causes of epithelial defects after penetrating keratoplasty in 114 eyes from January 2008 to January 2018. (B) Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in 480 eyes without epithelial defects from January 2008 to January 2018.
Characters of corneal defects after penetrating keratoplasty for different pathogenic causes of infectious keratitis.
| Bacterial | Viral | Fungal | Acanthamoeba | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidence of epithelial defects | 10(27.8%) | 37(21.9%) | 63(21.1%) | 2(11.8%) | 0.002 | |
| Number of healed | 9(90%) | 30(81.1%) | 46(73%) | 2(100%) | 0.739 | |
| Time at diagnosis of epithelial defects | ≤2weeks | 7(70%) | 10(27%) | 29(46%) | 0 | 0.045 |
| >2weeks | 3(30%) | 27(73%) | 34(54%) | 2(100%) | ||
| Mean size of epithelial defects (mm2) | 7.6±6.5 | 10.4±11.0 | 11.6±12.7 | 36.5±50.2 | 0.006 | |
| Mean duration of epithelial healing (day) | 13.3±6.7 | 10.8±6.0 | 10.6±5.6 | 8.5±2.1 | 0.232 |
* Chi-squared test.
# Fisher’s exact test.
& Kruskal–Wallis test.
Fig 2Comparison of graft clarity after penetrating keratoplasty among different etiologies of infectious keratitis in patients with and without epithelial defects during the follow-up period.
*Chi-squared test. §Chi-squared test with continuity correction. #Fisher’s exact test.
Regression analysis of various risk factors for epithelial defects after penetrating keratoplasty.
| Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk Factor | OR | 95%CI | P value | OR | 95%CI | P value |
| Sex (male) | 2.82 | 1.65–4.83 | <0.001 | 2.59 | 1.49–4.52 | 0.001 |
| Age≥60 years | 1.51 | 0.97–2.34 | 0.065 | 1.71 | 1.07–2.73 | 0.024 |
| Graft diameter>9mm | 2.22 | 1.42–3.45 | <0.001 | 2.41 | 1.46–3.98 | 0.001 |
| Primary disease | 0.019 | 0.014 | ||||
| Bacterial keratitis | 2.39 | 1.17–4.91 | 0.017 | 2.19 | 1.04–4.60 | 0.039 |
| Herpes simplex keratitis | 1.75 | 1.03–2.95 | 0.038 | 2.13 | 1.22–3.70 | 0.008 |
| Fungal keratitis | 1.67 | 1.02–2.73 | 0.041 | 1.62 | 0.98–2.70 | 0.062 |
| Acanthamoeba keratitis | 0.83 | 0.09–1.93 | 0.766 | 0.75 | 0.21–2.67 | 0.652 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 0.98 | 0.42–2.29 | 0.965 | 1.02 | 0.42–2.47 | 0.975 |
| Rheumatism | 3.28 | 1.11–9.64 | 0.031 | 3.72 | 1.13–12.25 | 0.031 |
| Cancer patients with chemo- or radiotherapy | 4.33 | 1.07–17.57 | 0.040 | 5.33 | 1.15–24.67 | 0.032 |