Literature DB >> 30485205

Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy: 5-year outcomes from the National Swedish Spine Register.

Anna MacDowall1, Martin Skeppholm2,3, Lars Lindhagen4, Yohan Robinson1, Håkan Löfgren5, Karl Michaëlsson1, Claes Olerud1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The long-term efficacy of artificial disc replacement (ADR) surgery compared with fusion after decompression for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy has not previously been investigated in a population-based setting.
METHODS: All patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy who were in the national Swedish Spine Registry (Swespine) beginning in January 1, 2006, were eligible for the study. Follow-up information was obtained up to November 15, 2017. The authors compared, using propensity score matching, patients treated with anterior decompression and insertion of an ADR with patients who underwent anterior decompression combined with fusion surgery. The primary outcome was the Neck Disability Index (NDI), a patient-reported function score ranging from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater disability and a minimum clinically important difference of > 15%.
RESULTS: A total of 3998 patients (2018:1980 women/men) met the inclusion criteria, of whom 204 had undergone arthroplasty and 3794 had undergone fusion. After propensity score matching, 185 patients with a mean age of 49.7 years remained in each group. Scores on the NDI were approximately halved in both groups after 5 years, but without a significant mean difference in NDI (3.0%; 95% CI -8.4 to 2.4; p = 0.28) between the groups. There were no differences between the groups in EuroQol-5 Dimensions or in pain scores for the neck and arm.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy, decompression plus ADR surgery did not result in a clinically important difference in outcomes after 5 years, compared with decompression and fusion surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACDF = anterior cervical decompression and fusion; ADR = artificial disc replacement; ASP = adjacent-segment degenerative pathology; BMI = body mass index; EQ-5D = EuroQol–5 Dimensions; IDE = investigational device exemption; NDI = Neck Disability Index; Neck Disability Index; PROM = patient-reported outcome measure; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SD = standard deviation; Swespine = Swedish Spine Registry; VAS = visual analog scale; adjacent-segment pathology; artificial disc replacement; cervical radiculopathy; degenerative; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30485205     DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.SPINE18657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  4 in total

1.  Segmental Motion of Cervical Arthroplasty Leads to Decreased Adjacent-Level Degeneration: Analysis of the 7-Year Postoperative Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Spivak; Jack E Zigler; Travis Philipp; Michael Janssen; Bruce Darden; Kris Radcliff
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-02-17

2.  Clinical efficacy and safety of posterior minimally invasive surgery in cervical spondylosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Junqiao Lv; Jun Mei; Xiaoning Feng; Xuefeng Tian; Lin Sun
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.677

3.  Long-term Results Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Qiao-Li Wang; Zhi-Ming Tu; Pan Hu; Filippos Kontos; Ya-Wei Li; Lei Li; Yu-Liang Dai; Guo-Hua Lv; Bing Wang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.071

4.  Accuracy and Reliability of X-ray Measurements in the Cervical Spine.

Authors:  Catarina Marques; Emma Granström; Anna MacDowall; Nuno Canto Moreira; Martin Skeppholm; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-11-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.