Literature DB >> 30485173

Danger of false negative (exclusion) or false positive (diagnosis) for 'congenital thrombophilia' in the age of anticoagulants.

Emmanuel J Favaloro1,2.   

Abstract

Background Most guidelines and experts recommend against performance of thrombophilia testing in general, and specifically against testing patients on pharmacological anticoagulants, due to substantially increased risk of false positive identification. For example, vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy affects protein C (PC) and protein S (PS), as well as some clotting assays (e.g. as used to investigate activated PC resistance [APCR]). Although heparin may also affect clotting assays, most commercial methods contain neutralisers to make them 'insensitive' to therapeutic levels. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) also affect a wide variety of thrombophilia assays, although most reported data has employed artificial in vitro spiked samples. Methods In the current report, data from our facility for the past 2.5 years has been assessed for all 'congenital thrombophilia' related tests, as evaluated against patient anticoagulant status. We processed 10,571 'thrombophilia' related test requests, including antithrombin (AT; n=3470), PC (n=3569), PS (n=3585), APCR (n=2359), factor V Leiden (FVL; n=2659), and prothrombin gene mutation (PGM; n=2103). Results As expected, VKA therapy affected PC and PS, and despite manufacturer claims, also APCR. Most assays, as suggested by manufacturers, were largely resistant to heparin therapy. DOACs' use was associated with falsely low APCR ratios (i.e. FVL-like effect) and somewhat unexpectedly, anti-Xa agents apixaban and rivaroxaban were also associated with lower AT and higher PS values. Conclusions It is concluded that ex-vivo data appears to confirm the potential for both false positive and false negative 'thrombophilia' events in patients on anticoagulant (including DOAC) treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activated protein C resistance; anticoagulant therapy; antithrombin; direct oral anticoagulants; laboratory practice; protein C; protein S; thrombophilia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30485173     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2018-1041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  2 in total

Review 1.  Thrombophilia testing in the era of direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Jennifer Darlow; Holly Mould
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 5.410

2.  Appropriateness of thrombophilia testing in patients in the acute care setting and an evaluation of the associated costs.

Authors:  Riddhi Virparia; Luigi Brunetti; Stuart Vigdor; Christopher D Adams
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.300

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.