Literature DB >> 30484882

Sunscreen bans: Coral reefs and skin cancer.

Robert B Raffa1,2,3, Joseph V Pergolizzi3,4, Robert Taylor4, Jan M Kitzen5.   

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND
OBJECTIVE: Hawaii will ban two major ingredients of sunscreens. This article reviews the reasons and future directions. Hawaii recently enacted legislation that will ban the use of two major ingredients of the majority of commonly used sunscreens. The reason for the ban is the ingredients' putative deleterious impact on marine ecosystems, particularly coral reefs. But sunscreens also save lives by decreasing the risk of UV-induced skin cancers. We review both sides of the issue and potential implications for the healthcare system. COMMENT: Coral reefs consist of organisms in delicate equilibria that are susceptible to small changes in their surroundings. Recent natural and man-made disruptions, direct or indirect, such as changes in ocean temperature and chemistry, ingress of invasive species, pathogens, pollution and deleterious fishing practices, have been blamed for the poor health, or even the outright destruction, of some coral reefs. The most popular sunscreen products contain two ingredients-oxybenzone and octinoxate-that have also been implicated in coral toxicity and will be banned. This creates a healthcare dilemma: Will the protection of coral reefs result in an increase in human skin cancers? WHAT IS NEW AND
CONCLUSION: Concentration estimates and mechanism studies support an association-direct or indirect (via promotion of viral infection)-of sunscreens with bleaching of coral reefs. A ban on the two most common sunscreen ingredients goes into effect in Hawaii on January 1, 2021. Proponents suggest that this is a trend, just the first of many such bans worldwide; opponents warn of a dire increase in human skin cancers. As a result, alternative sunscreen compounds are being sought.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coral reef; octinoxate; oxybenzone; skin cancer; sunscreen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30484882     DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther        ISSN: 0269-4727            Impact factor:   2.512


  6 in total

Review 1.  Visible light. Part II: Photoprotection against visible and ultraviolet light.

Authors:  Amaris N Geisler; Evan Austin; Julie Nguyen; Iltefat Hamzavi; Jared Jagdeo; Henry W Lim
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 2.  Pharmacologic manipulation of skin pigmentation.

Authors:  Gabriel H Kindl; John A D'Orazio
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.159

3.  A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals.

Authors:  Carys L Mitchelmore; Emily E Burns; Annaleise Conway; Andrew Heyes; Iain A Davies
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Aqueous aging of a silica coated TiO2 UV filter used in sunscreens: investigations at the molecular scale with dynamic nuclear polarization NMR.

Authors:  Danielle L Slomberg; Riccardo Catalano; Fabio Ziarelli; Stéphane Viel; Vincent Bartolomei; Jérôme Labille; Armand Masion
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Cu-Enhanced Efficient Förster Resonance Energy Transfer in PBSA Sunscreen-Associated Ternary Cu x Cd1-x S Quantum Dots.

Authors:  Muhammad Mubeen; Muhammad Adnan Khalid; Tehreem Gul; Maria Mukhtar; Anwar Ul-Hamid; Azhar Iqbal
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-09-20

6.  Streptomyces-Derived Metabolites with Potential Photoprotective Properties-A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis on the Reported Chemodiversity.

Authors:  Jeysson Sánchez-Suárez; Ericsson Coy-Barrera; Luisa Villamil; Luis Díaz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.