David E Wang1, Rishi K Wadhera1,2, Deepak L Bhatt1. 1. Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Richard and Susan Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: The US News & World Report (USNWR) identifies the "Best Hospitals" for "Cardiology and Heart Surgery." These rankings may have significant influence on patients and hospitals. Objective: To determine whether USNWR top-ranked hospitals perform better than nonranked hospitals on mortality rates and readmission measures as well as patient satisfaction. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national retrospective study evaluated outcomes at 3552 US hospitals from 2014 to 2017. Exposures: US News & World Report 2018 to 2019 Cardiology and Heart Surgery rankings (top-ranked vs nonranked hospitals). Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital-level 30-day risk-standardized mortality and readmission rates for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries age 65 years or older hospitalized for 3 cardiovascular conditions: acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as well as Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems patient satisfaction star ratings obtained from publicly available Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services data. Results: Thirty-day mortality rates at top-ranked hospitals (n = 50), compared with nonranked hospitals (n = 3502), were lower for AMI (11.9% vs 13.2%, P < .001), HF (9.5% vs 11.9%; P < .001), and CABG (2.3%vs 3.3%; P < .001). Thirty-day readmission rates at the top-ranked hospitals (n = 50) when compared with nonranked hospitals (n = 2841) were similar for AMI (16.7% vs 16.5%; P = .64) and CABG (14.1% vs 13.7%; P = .15) but higher for HF (21.0% vs 19.2%; P < .001), Finally, patient satisfaction was higher at top-ranked hospitals (n = 50) compared with nonranked hospitals (n = 3412) (3.9 vs 3.3; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: We found that USNWR top-ranked hospitals for cardiovascular care had lower 30-day mortality rates for AMI, HF, and CABG and higher patient satisfaction ratings compared with nonranked hospitals. However, 30-day readmission rates were either similar (for AMI and CABG) or higher (for HF) at top-ranked compared with nonranked hospitals. This discrepancy between readmissions and other performance measures raises concern that readmissions may not be an adequate metric of hospital care quality.
Importance: The US News & World Report (USNWR) identifies the "Best Hospitals" for "Cardiology and Heart Surgery." These rankings may have significant influence on patients and hospitals. Objective: To determine whether USNWR top-ranked hospitals perform better than nonranked hospitals on mortality rates and readmission measures as well as patient satisfaction. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national retrospective study evaluated outcomes at 3552 US hospitals from 2014 to 2017. Exposures: US News & World Report 2018 to 2019 Cardiology and Heart Surgery rankings (top-ranked vs nonranked hospitals). Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital-level 30-day risk-standardized mortality and readmission rates for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries age 65 years or older hospitalized for 3 cardiovascular conditions: acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as well as Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems patient satisfaction star ratings obtained from publicly available Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services data. Results: Thirty-day mortality rates at top-ranked hospitals (n = 50), compared with nonranked hospitals (n = 3502), were lower for AMI (11.9% vs 13.2%, P < .001), HF (9.5% vs 11.9%; P < .001), and CABG (2.3%vs 3.3%; P < .001). Thirty-day readmission rates at the top-ranked hospitals (n = 50) when compared with nonranked hospitals (n = 2841) were similar for AMI (16.7% vs 16.5%; P = .64) and CABG (14.1% vs 13.7%; P = .15) but higher for HF (21.0% vs 19.2%; P < .001), Finally, patient satisfaction was higher at top-ranked hospitals (n = 50) compared with nonranked hospitals (n = 3412) (3.9 vs 3.3; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: We found that USNWR top-ranked hospitals for cardiovascular care had lower 30-day mortality rates for AMI, HF, and CABG and higher patient satisfaction ratings compared with nonranked hospitals. However, 30-day readmission rates were either similar (for AMI and CABG) or higher (for HF) at top-ranked compared with nonranked hospitals. This discrepancy between readmissions and other performance measures raises concern that readmissions may not be an adequate metric of hospital care quality.
Authors: Oliver J Wang; Yun Wang; Judith H Lichtman; Elizabeth H Bradley; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-07-09
Authors: J Matthew Austin; Ashish K Jha; Patrick S Romano; Sara J Singer; Timothy J Vogus; Robert M Wachter; Peter J Pronovost Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Ankur Gupta; Larry A Allen; Deepak L Bhatt; Margueritte Cox; Adam D DeVore; Paul A Heidenreich; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Roland A Matsouaka; Clyde W Yancy; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Devraj Sukul; Deepak L Bhatt; Milan Seth; Pearl Zakroysky; Daniel Wojdyla; John S Rumsfeld; Tracy Wang; Sunil V Rao; Hitinder S Gurm Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2017-11-12 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Ambarish Pandey; Harsh Golwala; Haolin Xu; Adam D DeVore; Roland Matsouaka; Michael Pencina; Dharam J Kumbhani; Adrian F Hernandez; Deepak L Bhatt; Paul A Heidenreich; Clyde W Yancy; James A de Lemos; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Nicholas H Osborne; Lauren H Nicholas; Amir A Ghaferi; Gilbert R Upchurch; Justin B Dimick Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Jason H Wasfy; Corwin Matthew Zigler; Christine Choirat; Yun Wang; Francesca Dominici; Robert W Yeh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Robert E Freundlich; Gen Li; Brendan Grant; Paul St Jacques; Warren S Sandberg; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Matthew S Shotwell; Jonathan P Wanderer Journal: J Clin Anesth Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 9.452
Authors: Jennifer Grauberger; Megan O'Byrne; Anthony A Stans; William J Shaughnessy; A Noelle Larson; Todd A Milbrandt Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Derrick Nhan; Eric J M Lentz; Marilyn Steinberg; Chaim M Bell; Andrew M Morris Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-04-06 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Rittal Mehta; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Anghela Z Paredes; Kota Sahara; Amika Moro; Ayesha Farooq; Susan White; Aslam Ejaz; Allan Tsung; Mary Dillhoff; Jordan M Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 2.885
Authors: Kelly J Thomas Craig; Mollie M McKillop; Hu T Huang; Judy George; Ekta S Punwani; Kyu B Rhee Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 2.655