Literature DB >> 30484036

Impact of statistical reconstruction and compressed sensing algorithms on projection data elimination during X-ray CT image reconstruction.

Bing-Yu Sun1, Yoshihiko Hayakawa2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of incomplete, or total elimination of, projection data on computed tomography (CT) images subjected to statistical reconstruction and/or compressed sensing algorithms.
METHODS: Multidetector row CT images were used. The algebraic reconstruction technique (ART) and the maximum likelihood-expectation maximization (ML-EM) method were compared with filtered back-projection (FBP). Effects on reconstructed images were studied when the projection data of 360° (360 projections) were decreased to 180 or 90 projections by reducing the collection angle or thinning the image data. The total variation (TV) regularization method using compressed sensing was applied to images processed by the ART. Image noise was subjectively evaluated using the root-mean-square error and signal-to-noise ratio.
RESULTS: When projection data were reduced by one-half or three-quarters, ART and ML-EM produced better image quality than FBP. Both ART and ML-EM resulted in high quality at a spread of 90 projections over 180° rotation. Computational loading was high for statistical reconstruction, but not for ML-EM, compared with the ART. TV regularization made it possible to use only 36 projections while still achieving acceptable image quality.
CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete projection data-accomplished by reducing the angle to collect image data or thinning the projection data without reducing the angle of rotation over which it is collected-made it possible to reduce the radiation dose while retaining image quality with statistical reconstruction algorithms and/or compressed sensing. Despite heavier computational calculation loading, these methods should be considered for reducing radiation doses.

Keywords:  Compressed sensing; Computed tomography ; Image reconstruction; Incomplete projection data; Statistical reconstruction; X-ray

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 30484036     DOI: 10.1007/s11282-017-0308-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Radiol        ISSN: 0911-6028            Impact factor:   1.852


  18 in total

1.  Statistical inversion for medical x-ray tomography with few radiographs: II. Application to dental radiology.

Authors:  V Kolehmainen; S Siltanen; S Järvenpää; J P Kaipio; P Koistinen; M Lassas; J Pirttilä; E Somersalo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Sarah Darby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT.

Authors:  Marcel Beister; Daniel Kolditz; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Successive iterative restoration applied to streak artifact reduction in X-ray CT image of dento-alveolar region.

Authors:  Jian Dong; Atsushi Kondo; Kosuke Abe; Yoshihiko Hayakawa
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Image reconstruction for sparse-view CT and interior CT-introduction to compressed sensing and differentiated backprojection.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kudo; Taizo Suzuki; Essam A Rashed
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-06

Review 6.  Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Alvin C Silva; Holly J Lawder; Amy Hara; Jennifer Kujak; William Pavlicek
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Edge-preserving reconstruction from sparse projections of limited-angle computed tomography using ℓ0-regularized gradient prior.

Authors:  Wei Yu; Chengxiang Wang; Min Huang
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.523

8.  Statistical iterative reconstruction for streak artefact reduction when using multidetector CT to image the dento-alveolar structures.

Authors:  J Dong; Y Hayakawa; C Kober
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Probabilistic atlas prior for CT image reconstruction.

Authors:  Essam A Rashed; Hiroyuki Kudo
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction?

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Emil Y Sidky; Michael Vannier
Journal:  Inverse Probl       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.