Literature DB >> 30483946

Influence of biofilms on morbidity associated with short-term indwelling ureteral stents: a prospective observational study.

Patrick Betschart1, Valentin Zumstein2, Matthias T Buhmann3, Werner C Albrich4, Oliver Nolte5, Sabine Güsewell6, Hans-Peter Schmid2, Qun Ren3, Dominik Abt2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of biofilms on morbidity associated with short-term ureteral stenting using contemporary methods of biofilm examination and validated assessment of symptoms.
METHODS: Patients undergoing temporary ureteral stenting for secondary ureterorenoscopy due to urinary calculi were prospectively included. The German Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ) was used to assess stent-associated morbidity. Biofilms were removed from stents using 'pinhole extraction', a novel, validated, abrasion-based technique. Extracted biofilms were analyzed for total mass, bacterial load and mineral components. Correlation between total biofilm mass and USSQ total score was the primary outcome variable analyzed using Spearman correlation. Secondary outcomes included correlations between various biofilm characteristics and symptoms.
RESULTS: 94 patients were included in the analysis. Extracted biofilm mass had a median of 37.0 mg (0-310.2 mg) per stent. No correlation between total biofilm mass and USSQ total score was found (Spearman r = 0.012; p = 0.911). Correlations between biofilm characteristics and morbidity were generally weak and not significant. Significant correlations could be found between biofilm mass and hematuria (r = 0.280; p = 0.007), and between the number of bacteria (qPCR) and the USSQ subscore for pain (r = 0.243; p = 0.019) and the intake of analgesics (r = 0.259; p = 0.012).
CONCLUSION: Based on elaborated biofilm examination methods and validated self-reported outcome measures, our findings indicate that biofilms might aggravate some lower urinary tract symptoms but are not the main trigger for stent-associated morbidity in short-term ureteral stenting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; Morbidity; Symptoms; USSQ; Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire; Ureteral stent

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30483946     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2569-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  17 in total

1.  Bacterial colonization of ureteral stents.

Authors:  C R Riedl; E Plas; W A Hübner; H Zimmerl; W Ulrich; H Pflüger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Distribution and chemical coding of neurons in intramural ganglia of the porcine urinary bladder trigone.

Authors:  Zenon Pidsudko
Journal:  Folia Histochem Cytobiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.698

3.  The antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin protects the urinary tract against invasive bacterial infection.

Authors:  Milan Chromek; Zuzana Slamová; Peter Bergman; László Kovács; L'udmila Podracká; Ingrid Ehrén; Tomas Hökfelt; Gudmundur H Gudmundsson; Richard L Gallo; Birgitta Agerberth; Annelie Brauner
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2006-06-04       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  Eliminating biofilm from ureteral stents: the Holy Grail.

Authors:  John D Denstedt; Peter A Cadieux
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 5.  Biofilm formation on ureteral stents - Incidence, clinical impact, and prevention.

Authors:  Valentin Zumstein; Patrick Betschart; Werner C Albrich; Matthias T Buhmann; Qun Ren; Hans-Peter Schmid; Dominik Abt
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Escherichia coli-induced inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase expression in the mouse bladder and kidney.

Authors:  M Poljakovic; M L Svensson; C Svanborg; K Johansson; B Larsson; K Persson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Management of stent symptoms: what a pain!

Authors:  Nicholas A Faure Walker; Matthew F Bultitude; Kerry Brislane; Kay Thomas; Jonathan M Glass
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Influence of patient education on morbidity caused by ureteral stents.

Authors:  Dominik Abt; Elisabeth Warzinek; Hans-Peter Schmid; Sarah Roberta Haile; Daniel Stephan Engeler
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.369

9.  Prevention and treatment of symptoms associated with indwelling ureteral stents: A systematic review.

Authors:  Patrick Betschart; Valentin Zumstein; Alberto Piller; Hans-Peter Schmid; Dominik Abt
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 10.  Susceptibility to infectious diseases based on antimicrobial peptide production.

Authors:  Bruno Rivas-Santiago; Carmen J Serrano; J Antonio Enciso-Moreno
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Problems and solutions of stent biofilm and encrustations: A review of literature.

Authors:  Sara Khoddami; Ben H Chew; Dirk Lange
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-09

2.  Encrustations on ureteral stents from patients without urinary tract infection reveal distinct urotypes and a low bacterial load.

Authors:  Matthias T Buhmann; Dominik Abt; Oliver Nolte; Thomas R Neu; Sebastian Strempel; Werner C Albrich; Patrick Betschart; Valentin Zumstein; Antonia Neels; Katharina Maniura-Weber; Qun Ren
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 14.650

3.  Interactive Effects of Copper-Doped Urological Implants with Tissue in the Urinary Tract for the Inhibition of Cell Adhesion and Encrustation in the Animal Model Rat.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kram; Henrike Rebl; Julia E de la Cruz; Antonia Haag; Jürgen Renner; Thomas Epting; Armin Springer; Federico Soria; Marion Wienecke; Oliver W Hakenberg
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.967

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.