| Literature DB >> 30483904 |
Yin Song1, Wei Li1, Shuyan Meng1, Wei Zhou1, Bo Su2, Liang Tang2, Yinmin Zhao2, Xiaoyan Wu3, Dazhi Yin4, Mingxia Fan4, Caicun Zhou5.
Abstract
Enhanced MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) plays a vital role in the early detection of tumor but with low specificity. Molecular imaging of angiogenesis could efficiently deliver contrast agents to the tumor site by specific targeted carriers. We designed and synthesized dual-targeted paramagnetic liposomes functionalized with two angiogenesis-targeting ligands, the αVβ3 integrin-specific RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) and the neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) receptor-specific ATWLPPR (Ala-Thr-Trp-Leu-Pro-Pro-Arg) (A7R). These liposomes were proved to be in the nanoparticle range and demonstrated to effectively encapsulate paramagnetic MRI contrast agents Gd-DTPA (gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid). T1 relaxivity of various liposome formulations was lower than pure Gd-DTPA but with no statistically significant difference. In vitro cellular uptake and competitive inhibition assay showed the higher binding affinity of dual-targeted liposomes to HUVECs (human umbilical vein endothelial cells) and A549 cells compared with pure Gd-DTPA, non-targeted, and single-targeted liposomes, which was proved to be mediated by the binding of RGD/ανβ3-integrin and A7R/NRP1. For MR imaging of mice bearing A549 cells in vivo, dual-targeted liposomes reached the highest SER (signal enhancement rate) value with a significant difference at all experimental time points. It was about threefold increase compared to pure Gd-DTPA and non-targeted liposomes and was 1.5-fold of single-targeted liposomes at 2 h post injection. The SER was lowered gradually and decreased only by 40% of the peak value in 6 h. Dual-targeted liposomes were likely to exert a synergistic effect and the specificity of delivering Gd-DTPA to the tumor site. Therefore, dual-ανβ3-integrin-NRP1-targeting paramagnetic liposome with a RGD-ATWLPPR heterodimeric peptide might be a potent system for molecular imaging of tumor.Entities:
Keywords: Dual-targeted; MRI; Neuropilin-1; Tumor imaging; αVβ3-integrin
Year: 2018 PMID: 30483904 PMCID: PMC6258593 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2797-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1T1 relaxivity (s−1 mM−1) of pure Gd-DTPA, Gd-LP, P1-Gd-LP, P2-Gd-LP, and P3-Gd-LP solution measured in different gadolinium concentrations (mM). The data represent the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3), (P > 0.05)
Fig. 2a Cellular uptake experiments of Gd-LP, P1-Gd-LP, P2-Gd-LP, P3-Gd-LP, and P2/P3-Gd-LP in A549 cells and HUVECs. b-d Cellular competition study of P1-Gd-LP, P2-Gd-LP, and P3-Gd-LP, with P1, P2, and P3 respectively added to inhibit receptors in the competition groups. *P < 0.05, vs the other groups
Cellular competition study of P1-Gd-LP, P2-Gd-LP, and P3-Gd-LP, with P1, P2, and P3 respectively added to inhibit receptors in the competition groups. The data of all experiments were expressed by the mean ± standard deviation (n = 5)
| Gd concentration (mmol/l) | HUVEC | A549 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gd-LP | P1-Com | Gd-LP | P1-Com | |||||
| P1-Gd-LP | 1.15 ± 0.04 | 1.26 ± 0.10 | 1.12 ± 0.06 | 1.19 ± 0.08 | ||||
| 1.62 ± 0.16 | 1.62 ± 0.16 | 1.72 ± 0.07 | 1.72 ± 0.07 | |||||
| Gd-LP | – | 1.26 ± 0.10 | – | 1.19 ± 0.08 | ||||
| 1.15 ± 0.04 | 1.12 ± 0.0 | |||||||
| Gd-LP | P2-Com | Gd-LP | P2-Com | |||||
| P2-Gd-LP | 0.95 ± 0.03 | 1.05 ± 0.04 | 0.85 ± 0.06 | 0.90 ± 0.07 | ||||
| 1.24 ± 0.05 | 1.24 ± 0.05 | 1.03 ± 0.06 | 1.03 ± 0.06 | |||||
| Gd-LP | – | 1.05 ± 0.04 | – | 0.90 ± 0.07 | ||||
| 0.95 ± 0.03 | 0.85 ± 0.06 | |||||||
| Gd-LP | P3-Com | Gd-LP | P3-Com | |||||
| P3-Gd-LP | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 1.02 ± 0.06 | 0.88 ± 0.04 | 0.92 ± 0.06 | ||||
| 1.15 ± 0.4 | 1.15 ± 0.4 | 1.10 ± 0.10 | 1.10 ± 0.10 | |||||
| Gd-LP | – | 1.02 ± 0.06 | – | 0.92 ± 0.06 | ||||
| 0.92 ± 0.04 | 0.88 ± 0.04 | |||||||
Fig. 3MR images of tumor-bearing mice before and after injection with different contrast agents in different time points. a pure Gd-DTPA. b Gd-LP. c P1-Gd-LP. d P2-Gd-LP. e P3-Gd-LP
Fig. 4Determination of SER in different time points with an injection of pure Gd-DTPA, Gd-LP, P1-Gd-LP, P2-Gd-LP, and P3-Gd-LP. N = 3, and *P < 0.05 P1-Gd-LP vs the other four groups