Literature DB >> 30483899

Impact of image guidance on toxicity and tumour outcome in moderately hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

B A Jereczek-Fossa1,2, A Maucieri1, G Marvaso3, S Gandini4, C Fodor1, D Zerini1, G Riva1,2, O Alessandro1,2, A Surgo1, S Volpe1,2, G Fanetti1, S Arculeo1,2, M A Zerella1,2, S Parisi1, P Maisonneuve5, A Vavassori1, F Cattani6, R Cambria6, C Garibaldi7, A Starzyńska8, G Musi9, O De Cobelli2,9, M Ferro9, F Nolè10, D Ciardo1, R Orecchia11.   

Abstract

To report toxicity and efficacy outcome of moderately hypofractionated image-guided external-beam radiotherapy in a large series of patients treated for prostate cancer (PCa). Between 10/2006 and 12/2015, 572 T1-T3N0M0 PCa patients received 70.2 Gy in 26 fractions at 2.7 Gy/fraction: 344 patients (60%) with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and 228 (40%) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria and Houston definition (nadir + 2) were used for toxicity and biochemical failure evaluation, respectively. Median age was 74 years (interquartile range 69-77). Compared with 3D-CRT, in IMRT group more high-risk patients (29% vs 18%; P = 0.002) and more high-volume target (75% vs 60%; P < 0.001) were included. Acute gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity G > 1 were registered in 8% and in 11% IMRT and 3D-CRT patients, respectively, whereas late GI G > 1 were observed in 2% and 16% IMRT and 3D-CRT patients, respectively. Acute genito-urinary (GU) toxicity G > 1 were registered in 26% and 40% IMRT and 3D-CRT patients, respectively, whereas late GU G > 1 occurred in 5% IMRT and 15% 3D-CRT patients. Multivariate proportional hazard Cox models confirmed significantly greater risk of late toxicity with 3D-CRT compared to IMRT for GU > 1 (P = 0.004) and for GI > 1 (P < 0.001). With a median 4-year follow-up, overall survival (OS), clinical progression-free survival (cPFS) and biochemical PFS (bPFS) for the whole series were 91%, 92% and 91%, respectively. cPFS and bPFS were significantly different by risk groups. Multivariate Cox models for bPFS and cPFS showed no difference between irradiation techniques and a significant impact of risk group and initial PSA. Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy is a viable treatment option for localized PCa with excellent tumour control and satisfactory toxicity profile. IMRT seems associated with a reduction in toxicity, whereas tumour control was equal between IMRT and 3D-CRT patients and depended mainly on the risk category.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose escalation; Hypofractionation; Image-guided radiotherapy; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30483899     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1233-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  29 in total

1.  Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison.

Authors:  G O De Meerleer; L A Vakaet; W R De Gersem; C De Wagter; B De Naeyer; W De Neve
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Planning study to compare dynamic and rapid arc techniques for postprostatectomy radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Cambria; F Cattani; B A Jereczek-Fossa; F Pansini; D Ciardo; S Vigorito; S Russo; D Zerini; L Cozzi; R Orecchia
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Moderate Hypofractionation in High-Risk, Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Final Results of a Phase III Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Giorgio Arcangeli; Biancamaria Saracino; Stefano Arcangeli; Sara Gomellini; Maria Grazia Petrongari; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Lidia Strigari
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer.

Authors:  M J Zelefsky; Z Fuks; L Happersett; H J Lee; C C Ling; C M Burman; M Hunt; T Wolfe; E S Venkatraman; A Jackson; M Skwarchuk; S A Leibel
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Randomized trial of hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Gail Walker; Eric M Horwitz; Robert Price; Steven Feigenberg; Andre A Konski; Radka Stoyanova; Benjamin Movsas; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Charlie Ma; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Luca Incrocci; Ruud C Wortel; Wendimagegn Ghidey Alemayehu; Shafak Aluwini; Erik Schimmel; Stijn Krol; Peter-Paul van der Toorn; Hanja de Jager; Wilma Heemsbergen; Ben Heijmen; Floris Pos
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  Hypofractionated radiotherapy for organ-confined prostate cancer: is less more?

Authors:  Stefano Arcangeli; Carlo Greco
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Rationale, conduct, and outcome using hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark Ritter
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.934

9.  Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: Cleveland Clinic experience.

Authors:  Patrick A Kupelian; Twyla R Willoughby; Chandana A Reddy; Eric A Klein; Arul Mahadevan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  The Effectiveness of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy versus Three-Dimensional Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of the Literatures.

Authors:  Ting Yu; Qiongwen Zhang; Tianying Zheng; Huashan Shi; Yang Liu; Shijian Feng; Meiqin Hao; Lei Ye; Xueqian Wu; Cheng Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Toxicity reduction required for MRI-guided radiotherapy to be cost-effective in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Leif-Erik D Schumacher; Alan Dal Pra; Sarah E Hoffe; Eric A Mellon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Siping Zeng; Gangyun Guan; Qiuwei Qin; Huadong Xie; Yongyan Meng; Qiyue Zhao
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: updated long-term outcome and toxicity analysis.

Authors:  Jörg Tamihardja; Max Schortmann; Ingulf Lawrenz; Stefan Weick; Klaus Bratengeier; Michael Flentje; Matthias Guckenberger; Bülent Polat
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.621

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.