| Literature DB >> 30483402 |
Michał Glądalski1, Adam Kaliński1, Jarosław Wawrzyniak1, Mirosława Bańbura2, Marcin Markowski1, Joanna Skwarska1, Jerzy Bańbura1.
Abstract
Most passerines use nests as the exclusive place to lay and incubate eggs and bring nestlings up to fledging. Nests of secondary cavity nesters, like tits, provide a moist, warm and protected habitat for reproduction of blood parasites. Offspring fitness depends on interactions between parental care and environmental constraints. Life-history theory suggests that macro- and micro-parasites may generate selection pressures by affecting host health. In the present study, we replaced natural great tit Parus major nests in two, structurally and floristically contrasting sites (an urban parkland and a rich deciduous forest, located 10 km apart in Łódź, central Poland), with fresh, sterilized, artificial moss-cotton wool nests, twice, on the fifth and tenth day of nestlings life. We then examined haematological condition indicators (haemoglobin and glucose concentrations) of about 14-day-old nestlings. Nestlings that were developing in treated nests improved their health status in comparison with control nestlings. The mean haemoglobin and glucose concentrations (treated and control) also varied between both study areas. Our study confirms that the level of haemoglobin and especially the level of glucose may be treated as reliable indicator of environmental characteristics in great tits.Entities:
Keywords: Body condition; Parus major; environmental stress; haematology; nest; physiological condition; urban populations; wild populations
Year: 2018 PMID: 30483402 PMCID: PMC6249426 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coy062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Physiol ISSN: 2051-1434 Impact factor: 3.079
Summary of a linear mixed model analysis for haemoglobin and glucose concentrations in the blood of great tit nestlings. Effects of study area and experimental treatment are given (mean wing length as covariate, significant values are in bold). Non-significant effects were removed.
| Factor (covariate) | Df | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1; 182.7 | 31.8 | |
| Study area | 1; 61.5 | 6.5 | |
| Experiment | 1; 60.7 | 17.6 | |
| Wing length (cov) | 1; 183.6 | 11.1 | |
| Removed non-significant effects | |||
| Study area * exp. * wing l. | 1; 182.0 | 0.8 | 0.388 |
| Study area * wing length | 1; 179.7 | 0.0 | 0.991 |
| Experiment * wing length | 1; 184.0 | 2.0 | 0.159 |
| Study area * experiment | 1; 59.8 | 1.9 | 0.171 |
| Intercept | 1; 124.0 | 3.2 | 0.076 |
| Study area | 1; 62.1 | 18.7 | |
| Experiment | 1; 60.0 | 11.3 | |
| Wing length (cov) | 1; 124.9 | 9.9 | |
| Removed non-significant effects | |||
| Study area * exp. * wing l. | 1; 141.6 | 1.5 | 0.217 |
| Study area * experiment | 1; 58.7 | 0.0 | 0.906 |
| Experiment * wing length | 1; 144.2 | 0.1 | 0.820 |
| Study area * wing length | 1; 120.1 | 0.3 | 0.596 |
Figure 1:Mean haemoglobin concentrations (g/l) in experimentally treated nests (treated nests with replaced, artificial nests) and control nests in the parkland study area and in the forest study area, with wing length being used as an age-controlling covariate (data shown as mean ± SE).
Figure 2:Mean glucose concentrations (mg/dl) in experimentally treated nests (treated nests with replaced, artificial nests) and control nests in the parkland study area and in the forest study area, with wing length being used as an age-controlling covariate (data shown as mean ± SE).