Literature DB >> 30483371

Bacteriological profile of intra-abdominal infections in a tertiary care hospital.

Sukanya Sudhaharan1, Padmaja Kanne1, Lakshmi Vemu1, Padmasri Chavali1, Shanker Rao Desmukha1, Bheerappa Nagari1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) include a wide spectrum of pathological conditions, ranging from uncomplicated appendicitis to fecal peritonitis .The resulting infections should be diagnosed early and treated based on the organism isolated and its susceptibility. In this study the bacteriological profile and antimicrobial resistance pattern of intra-abdominal infections was analyzed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of samples received from 119 cases of intra-abdominal infections in our Institute from January 2015 to December 2017 was analyzed. Patients with primary peritonitis from cirrhosis or ascites were not included in the study. The specimens were primarily processed, as per standard methods. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by the Vitek-2 system. Anaerobic culture was performed on 5% sheep blood agar plates and incubated in GEN bag anaerobic pouches.
RESULTS: In our study perforative peritonitis 43/119 (36.1%) was predominant IAI followed by acute pancreatitis 14/119 (11.7%) and pancreatic necrosis 12/119 (10%). Microbial growth was observed in 66.3% (79/119) of the cases and combined infections were observed in14/119 (11.7%) of the cases. Escherichia coli was the predominant organism isolated in 58/119 (40.8%), out of which 41/58 (70.6%) were ESBL producers and 16/58 (27.5%) were multi drug resistant isolates. Klebsiella pneumoniae was isolated from 11/119 (9.2%) cases out of which 8/11 (72.7%) were ESBL and 3/11 (27.2%) were multidrug resistant isolates. Post-operative complications was observed in 12/119 (10%) patients with mortality in 15/119 (12.6%) patients.
CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis and appropriate management of the infections will help to prevent the morbidity and mortality associated with these infections.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendicitis; Cholecystitis; Pancreatic necrosis; Perforation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30483371      PMCID: PMC6243144     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Microbiol        ISSN: 2008-3289


INTRODUCTION

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) include a wide spectrum of pathological conditions, ranging from uncomplicated appendicitis to fecal peritonitis (1). The resulting infection is typically polymicrobial and comprised of both aerobic and anaerobic microbes, which need systemic antimicrobial therapy (2). Antibiotic therapy has to be modified based on culture and susceptibility testing. Surgery along with appropriate antibiotics will help to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with intra-abdominal infections. Aim & objectives of this study were: 1) To study the bacteriological profile and antimicrobial resistance pattern of the organisms isolated from IAI and 2) To study the type of IAI, organ involved and mortality associated with IAI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of samples received from 119 cases of intra-abdominal infections undergoing surgery or interventional drainage in our institute from January 2015 to December 2017 was analyzed. Patients with primary peritonitis from cirrhosis or ascites were not included in the study. The specimens such as peritoneal fluids, pus, bile, ascitic fluid received to the microbiology department were primarily processed, as per standard methods, on 5% sheep blood agar (aerobic and anaerobic) and Chromogenic agar (CPS ID, bioMerieux, Marcy Elitoile, France) and also inoculated into Bact/Alert SN bottles. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by the Vitek-2 system (bio-Merieux, Marcy Elitoile, France). Anaerobic culture was performed on 5% sheep blood agar plates and incubated in GEN bag anaerobic pouches (bioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile-France).

RESULTS

In our study perforative peritonitis, 43/119 (36.1%), was predominant infection followed by acute pancreatitis 14/119 (11.7%) and pancreatic necrosis 12/119 (10%). Other infections include cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, choledocholithiasis (Table 1). Perforations of abdominal organs include small bowel, appendix, gall bladder, stomach, duodenum and colon. (Fig. 1). Small bowel is the common organ perforated in 28/43 (65.1%) of the cases.
Table 1.

Total No of cases (n=119)

InfectionSterileMonomicrobial infectionsPolymicrobial infectionsTotal
Acute pancreatitis68014
Chronic pancreatitis2215
Pancreatic necrosis35412
Pancreatic pseudocyst4509
Appendicular abscess2204
Acute cholecystitis2002
Cholangitis1719
Choledochal cyst4116
Choledocholithiasis19212
Cholelithiasis2103
Perforations (n=43)
Appendix2002
Gall bladder2507
Colon1102
Stomach1001
Duodenum1203
Small bowel617528
Total IAI’S406514119
Fig. 1.

Source of infection according to organ of origin

Source of infection according to organ of origin Total No of cases (n=119) As per organ type involved pancreas was the predominant organ involved in 40/119 (33.6%) cases (Table 2).
Table 2.

Gram negative bacilli isolated

InfectionEscherichia coliKlebsiella pneumoniaeProteus mirabilisPseudomonas aeruginosa
Pancreas
Acute pancreatitis5010
Chronic pancreatitis2010
Pancreatic necrosis5220
Pancreatic pseudocyst2000
Total1424-
Appendix
Appendicular abscess2000
Gall bladder
Cholangitis7101
Choledochal cyst2000
Choledocholithiasis8200
Cholelithiasis1000
Total183-1
Perforation
Gall bladder perforation4100
Duodenal perforation2000
Colon perforation0100
Small bowel perforation18500
Total247--
TOTAL581241
Gram negative bacilli isolated Microbial growth was observed in 66.3% (79/119) of the patients and among them 14/119 (11.7%) were combined infections (Table 1). E. coli was the predominant organism isolated in 58/119 (40.8%) of IAI’s, of which 41/58 (70.6%) were ESBL producers and 16/58 (27.5%) were multi drug resistant isolates. K. pneumoniae was isolated from 11/119 (9.2%) cases of which 8/11 (72.7%) were ESBL and 3/11 (27.2%) were multidrug resistant isolates. Other organisms isolated include K. pneumonia, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Table 2). Majority of the E. coli was isolated in cases with small bowel perforation 18/58 (31%) followed by choledocholithiasis 8/58 (13.7%) (Table 2). Other Gram negative and Gram positive organisms isolated in different IAI’s are shown in Tables 2–4. The antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the organisms is listed in Tables 5 and 6.
Table 4.

No of Gram positive cocci isolated

InfectionMRSAMSSAEnterococcus
Chronic pancreatitis100
Pancreatic pseudocyst010
Choledocholithiasis001
Small bowel perforation003
Total114
Table 5.

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Gram negative isolates

OrganismsNo. of isolates% Susceptibility to specified antibiotics

AmikacinGentamicinCiprofloxacinLevofloxacinCotrimoxazoleCeftazidimeCefepimeImipenemMeropenemPip/TaZSulb/cefapeColistinTigecycline
Escherichia coli5848.848.811.911.910.81.71.770.670.64742.3100100
Klebsiella pneumoniae1245.745.712.912.911.40072.772.714.321.481.480.9
Proteus mirabilis475755050750050100100100IRIR
Pseudomonas aeruginosa1100000IR000000100IR
Enterobacter cloacae210010000100100100100100100100100100
Stenotrophomonas S. maltophilia3IRIRIR100100100NTIRIRIRIRNTNT
Morganella morganii1100100000100100100100100100IRIR
Aeromonas hydrophila2100100100100100505010010050100100NT
Burkholderia cepacia1IRIRIR100100100IRIR100IRIRIRIR

IR Intrinsically resistant

NT Not tested

Table 6.

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Gram positive isolates

OrganismsNo. of Isolates% Susceptibility to specified antibiotics

PenicillinOxacillinGentamicinCiprofloxacinLevofloxacinCo-t rimoxazoleTetracyclineClindamycinErythromycinLinezolidVancomycinTeicoplaninDaptomycin
MRSA1000000000100100100100
MSSA1010010000100100100100100100100100
Enterococcus faecium40IRIR00IR50IR0100100100100

IR Intrinsically resistant

NT Not tested

Other Gram negative bacilli isolated No of Gram positive cocci isolated Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Gram negative isolates IR Intrinsically resistant NT Not tested Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Gram positive isolates IR Intrinsically resistant NT Not tested Post-operative complications (anastomotic leak, pleural effusion, gastro-intestinal fistula, sepsis) was observed in 12/119 (10%) patients and mortality in 15/119 (12.6%) patients (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.

Mortality

Mortality

DISCUSSION

Intra-abdominal infection varies widely, ranging from peritonitis to intrahepatic infection to diverticulitis, appendicitis, and intra-abdominal abscess. IAI’s are common surgical emergencies and they are responsible for non-trauma deaths worldwide (3). The pathogenesis of intra abdominal infections is determined by bacterial factors which influence the transition from contamination to infection. Bacterial activation leads to transmigration of granulocytes resulting in increased permeability, edema and protein rich peritoneal exudates (4). Perforative peritonitis was seen in 36.1% of our cases. Perforation is one of the serious infections which require immediate surgery and both aerobic and anaerobic flora are isolated from peritoneal fluid (3). In a study from India about the spectrum of peritonitis, they found that gastroduodenal perforation is most common accounting for 54.2% of the cases (5) in contrast to our study. In a study from Serbia, they found that small bowel perforations accounted for 23% of the cases (6) whereas in our study it is the commonest of perforations accounting for 65.1%. Our patients were treated by surgery with closure of perforation & resection and anastomosis. In a study by CIOWA (7) most of the cases of IAI are due to appendicitis (33.3%) followed by cholecystitis (14.6%) and small bowel perforation (7.6%). The involvement of appendix was low in our study indicating less complicated course of the disease requiring referral to a tertiary care centre. Reshetnyak et al. found that in Western countries, gallstone disease in men was 7.9% and it was 16.6% in women (8) whereas Sun et al. found in Asia, it ranged 3–15% (9), as in our study stones in the gall bladder accounted for 15/119 (12.6%) of the cases followed by cholangitis in 7.5% of the cases. In our study pancreas was the predominant organ involved. Pancreatitis and pancreatic necrosis together contribute to 31/119 (26%) of cases and bacterial growth was observed in 20/31 (64.5%) of cases. Pancreatic necrosis if infected is an important risk factor and it should be treated by surgery (10). All our cases were treated with surgery and removal of necrosum followed by appropriate antibiotics therapy. In a study by Dionigi R et al. they found that enteric Gram negative bacilli are commonly isolated from acute pancreatitis (11). E. coli was isolated in 35.7% of our cases of pancreatic infection. In a study by Goldstein et al. the most common organism isolated in cases of perforation was E. coli (51.72%) followed by Klebsiella (29.31%) (2). Similar to our study E. coli was predominant organism followed by Klebsiella. In the study of Goldstein et al. acute appendicitis was the most common condition requiring emergency surgery (2). In a study by Lahiri et al. from India, the commonest organism isolated was E. coli (67.78%) (12) as in our study. The presence of gallstones within either the gall-bladder or biliary tree is associated with the bacterial colonization of the bile. Similar to our study, E. coli was the most common organism isolated in a study conducted by Ballal et al. from India (13). E. coli (62.7%), K. pneumoniae (16.7%), and P. aeruginosa (5.3%) were the most frequently isolated pathogens in IAI’s from India in a study conducted by Shree et al. (14). As per literature review (1, 2, 13, 14), E. coli was the most frequent pathogen associated with IAI which is similar to our study where E. coli was isolated from 40.8% of cases. There is an increase of extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and multi-drug resistant (MDR) isolates worldwide in the study by Shree et al. (14). Among the intra-operative isolates, ESBL producing E. coli isolates comprised 13.7%, while ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae isolates represented 18.6% in the study done by CIOWA (7). There was a higher percentage of ESBL producers in E. coli (70.6%) and K. pneumoniae (72.5%) in our study also which is of increasing concern. In the study by Goldstein et al, they described the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria such as P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from IAI’s (2). In a study from Greece, 8.8% of intra-abdominal infections is caused by S. maltophilia and is intrinsically resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics due to different mechanism of resistance. The drug of choice for infection with this organism is trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (15). In our study, we isolated P. aeruginosa from one patient with cholangitis, S. maltophilia in 3 patients and one burkholderia cepacia from a case of pancreatic necrosis. These infections are mostly hospital acquired and are multidrug resistant and require strict infection prevention control measures (14). Bacteroides fragilis accounts for only 0.5% of the normal colonic flora, hence is recognized as the single most important anaerobic pathogen (3). In study of Goldstein et al, Bacteroides accounted for 34.6% of the anaerobes isolated from IAI (16). Metronidazole is the choice of therapy for Bacteroides (17). We isolated Bacteroides from 2 cases of pancreatitis which was low compared to other studies which might have been due to the empirical therapy with metronidazole given to our patients. Enterococcus is the commonest Gram positive bacteria isolated from IAI’s (7). In a study by Marcus et al. they isolated 5 cases of Enterococcus and one case of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) from IAI (18). In our study we isolated four cases of E. faecium and one case of MRSA. Enterococcus does not have a poor prognosis and empiric therapy is not recommended for these organism in community acquired infections (18), whereas it is more prevalent in hospital acquired infections requiring antibiotic therapy (7). In a study from France they found that IAI’s due to MRSA may be due to nasal colonization (19). The source of infection in our case could not be traced. Our patients were empirically treated with piperacillin-tazobactum, amikacin and metronidazole. As per IDSA guidelines metronidazole is given as an intravenous infusion of 500 mg every 8–12 hr or 1500 mg every 24 h, intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g every 6 hr and amikacin 15–20 mg/kg every 24 hr. The therapy can be discontinued if there is no evidence of infection (20). In patients with post-operative complications and in infections with drug resistant isolates antibiotics were changed based on drug susceptibility reports. Around 27% of E. coli and K. pneumoniae were MDR isolates and they were sensitive to colistin. All these patients were treated with intravenous colistin 3MU every 8th hourly. Post-operative complications should be managed intensively with broad spectrum antibiotics for sepsis, leakage, additional surgeries and controlling the source of complication (4). In our study it was less accounting for 10% of the cases. The rate of mortality was significantly higher in patients with higher degree of pancreatic necrosis from 5–40% as reported by Pal et al. (21). In our study mortality was higher (7/12, 58%) in pancreatic necrosis of all pancreatic involvement, probably due to the higher degree of necrosis in our patients. The other important cause of mortality in intraabdominal infections is perforative peritonitis (22) and the mortality ranges from 6 and 27% as reported by Oheneh et al. (23) and in small bowel perforations which is common it accounts between 10 and 36.5% according to the report of Bapat et al. (24). Mortality due to perforations was 8/43 (19%) in our study. As our institute is a tertiary care centre we had complicated cases like pancreatic necrosis and less severe case of acute appendicitis. Multi drug resistant organisms, mostly hospital acquired, were successfully treated as per susceptibility results. All multidrug resistant cases were advised to follow proper infection control measures. There was no significant difference in the organism isolated and organ of infection. Hence empirical treatment can be started based on hospital antibiogram which helps to prevent complications associated with hospital acquired IAI’s. In conclusion, initial empirical antibiotic therapy should be modified based on the organism isolated and susceptibility results. In addition, patients with intra-abdominal infections should be administered the most potent antibiotics immediately rather than the most commonly used antibiotics. Early diagnosis and appropriate management of the infections will help to prevent the morbidity and mortality associated with these infections.
Table 3.

Other Gram negative bacilli isolated

OrganismsNo of casesInfection
Enterobacter cloacae2Pancreatic Pseudocyst
Small bowel perforation
Stenotrophomonas3Chronic pancreatitis
S. maltophiliaAcute pancreatitis
Pancreatic necrosis
Morganella morganii1Pancreatic necrosis
Aeromonas hydrophila2Choledocholithiasis
Burkholderia cepacia1Pancreatic necrosis
Citrobacter freundii1Choledochal cyst
Bacteroides2Acute pancreatitis
Pancreatic Necrosis
  23 in total

Review 1.  Infected pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Renzo Dionigi; Francesca Rovera; Gianlorenzo Dionigi; Mario Diurni; Salvatore Cuffari
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.150

Review 2.  Epidemiology and pathophysiology of intraabdominal infections (IAI).

Authors:  E H Farthmann; U Schöffel
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  A focus on intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Gender and metabolic differences of gallstone diseases.

Authors:  Hui Sun; Hong Tang; Shan Jiang; Li Zeng; En-Qiang Chen; Tao-You Zhou; You-Juan Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Metronidazole is still the drug of choice for treatment of anaerobic infections.

Authors:  Sonja Löfmark; Charlotta Edlund; Carl Erik Nord
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Intra-abdominal infections: review of the bacteriology, antimicrobial susceptibility and the role of ertapenem in their therapy.

Authors:  Ellie J C Goldstein; David R Snydman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Joseph S Solomkin; John E Mazuski; John S Bradley; Keith A Rodvold; Ellie J C Goldstein; Ellen J Baron; Patrick J O'Neill; Anthony W Chow; E Patchen Dellinger; Soumitra R Eachempati; Sherwood Gorbach; Mary Hilfiker; Addison K May; Avery B Nathens; Robert G Sawyer; John G Bartlett
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections in a general hospital: patient characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility, and treatment outcome.

Authors:  George Samonis; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Sofia Maraki; Panagiotis Levis; Dimitra Dimopoulou; Nikolaos A Spernovasilis; Diamantis P Kofteridis; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Secondary peritonitis - evaluation of 204 cases and literature review.

Authors:  S K Doklestić; D D Bajec; R V Djukić; V Bumbaširević; A D Detanac; S D Detanac; M Bracanović; R A Karamarković
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014-06-25

Review 10.  The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli; Alain Chichom-Mefire; Francesco M Labricciosa; Timothy Hardcastle; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Abdulrashid K Adesunkanmi; Luca Ansaloni; Miklosh Bala; Zsolt J Balogh; Marcelo A Beltrán; Offir Ben-Ishay; Walter L Biffl; Arianna Birindelli; Miguel A Cainzos; Gianbattista Catalini; Marco Ceresoli; Asri Che Jusoh; Osvaldo Chiara; Federico Coccolini; Raul Coimbra; Francesco Cortese; Zaza Demetrashvili; Salomone Di Saverio; Jose J Diaz; Valery N Egiev; Paula Ferrada; Gustavo P Fraga; Wagih M Ghnnam; Jae Gil Lee; Carlos A Gomes; Andreas Hecker; Torsten Herzog; Jae Il Kim; Kenji Inaba; Arda Isik; Aleksandar Karamarkovic; Jeffry Kashuk; Vladimir Khokha; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Yoram Kluger; Kaoru Koike; Victor Y Kong; Ari Leppaniemi; Gustavo M Machain; Ronald V Maier; Sanjay Marwah; Michael E McFarlane; Giulia Montori; Ernest E Moore; Ionut Negoi; Iyiade Olaoye; Abdelkarim H Omari; Carlos A Ordonez; Bruno M Pereira; Gerson A Pereira Júnior; Guntars Pupelis; Tarcisio Reis; Boris Sakakhushev; Norio Sato; Helmut A Segovia Lohse; Vishal G Shelat; Kjetil Søreide; Waldemar Uhl; Jan Ulrych; Harry Van Goor; George C Velmahos; Kuo-Ching Yuan; Imtiaz Wani; Dieter G Weber; Sanoop K Zachariah; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  1 in total

1.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Microorganisms Isolated from Patients with Intraabdominal Infection in Korea: a Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Young Kyung Yoon; Jieun Kim; Chisook Moon; Mi Suk Lee; Jian Hur; Hojin Lee; Shin Woo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.153

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.