| Literature DB >> 30483288 |
Tünde Takács1, Imre Cseresnyés1, Ramóna Kovács1, István Parádi1,2, Bettina Kelemen1, Tibor Szili-Kovács1, Anna Füzy1.
Abstract
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) is regarded worldwide as indisputably one of the most important crops for human food and animal feed. The presence of symbiotic bacteria and fungi is essential for soybean breeding, especially in low-input agricultural systems. Research on the cooperation between different microbial symbionts is a key to understanding how the health and productivity of the plant is supported. The symbiotic effectivity of dual and tripartite symbiotic agents was investigated in two pot experiments on different soybean cultivars with special regard to compatibility. In the Selection experiment, two out of sixteen soybean cultivars (Aliz, Emese) were chosen on the basis of their drought tolerance and used in all the other investigations. In the Compatibility experiment, the compatible coupling of symbiotic partners was selected based on the efficiency of single and co-inoculation with two Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains and two commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) products. Significant differences were found in the infectivity and effectivity of the microsymbionts. The rhizobial and AMF inoculation generally improved plant production, photosynthetic efficiency and root activity, but this effect depended on the type of symbiotic assotiation. Despite the low infectivity of AMF, inocula containing fungi were more beneficial than those containing only rhizobia. In the Drought Stress (DS) experiment, co-inoculated and control plants were grown in chernozem soil originating from organic farms. Emese was more resistant to drought stress than Aliz and produced a bigger root system. Under DS, the growth parameters of both microbially inoculated cultivars were better than that of control, proving that even drought tolerant genotypes can strengthen their endurance due to inoculation with AMF and nitrogen fixing bacteria. Root electrical capacitance (CR) showed a highly significant linear correlation with root and shoot dry mass and leaf area. The same root biomass was associated with higher CR in inoculated hosts. As CR method detects the absorptive surface increasing due to inoculation, it may be used to check the efficiency of the microbial treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Bradyrhizobium japonicum; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; drought stress; functional diversity; root electrical capacitance; soybean; symbiotic compatibility
Year: 2018 PMID: 30483288 PMCID: PMC6243127 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Characteristics of soybean cultivars tested in the germination experiment.
| Cultivar (Year of state registration) | Maturity group | 1000-grain weighta (g) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAGERA (2007, Switzerland) | [00] | 148.7 (7.0) | 29.4 (11.4) |
| ES MENTOR (2011, France) | [00] | 189.0 (3.5) | 13.3 (11.2) |
| ALIZ (2007, Hungary) | [0] | 182.2 (5.2) | 60.3 (4.5) |
| JOHANNA (2011, Hungary) | [0] | 208.3 (6.2) | 19.2 (11.6) |
| MARTINA (2006, Hungary) | [0] | 202.3 (5.2) | 23.8 (10.2) |
| SPLENDOR (2006, EU) | [0] | 180.0 (2.7) | 0.0 |
| ES GLADIÁTOR (2014, France) | [0-I] | 180.9 (3.0) | 10.77 (6.11) |
| EMESE (2006, Hungary) | [I] | 176.4 (3.3) | 54.7 (10.8) |
| ISIDOR (2005, EU) | [I] | 219.0 (5.6) | 17.9 (15.9) |
| PANNÓNIA KINCSE (2008, Hungary) | [I] | 130.1 (3.3) | 1.0 (2.0) |
| SPONSOR (2005, France) | [I] | 156.7 (3.2) | 43.9 (10.7) |
| ZELMA (2008, Hungary) | [I] | 168.7 (7.7) | 29.5 (9.6) |
| GROWPRO (United States) | [II] | 223.1 (3.3) | 11.8 (7.9) |
| HIPRO 15/MN 1505 (2010, United States) | [II] | 198.1 (4.6) | 17.1 (8.0) |
| ROYALPRO (2006, United States) | [II] | 247.5 (4.1) | 11.0 (1.0) |
| PRESTOPRO (United States) | [II] | 117.7 (1.5) | 27.4 (12.0) |
FIGURE 1(A) Shoot dry weight (SDW), (B) leaf area (LA), (C) root dry weight (RDW), and (D) root electrical capacitance (CR) of Emese and Aliz soybean cultivars in the Compatibility experiment. Mean values of the microbial inoculation treatments (left side in the Figure: C, control plants; R1 and R2 rhizobia; F1 and F2 AM fungal products) and mean values of soybean cultivars (right side in the Figure). Error bars represent LSD (n = 4; p < 0.05).
Nitrogen (N) content (%) of soybean leaves at the end of the Compatibility experiment.
| N (%) | Cultivar: Emese | Cultivar: Aliz | LSD5% 0.30 |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | 2.48 ± 0.44 | 2.50 ± 0.34 | 2.49 |
| F1 | 2.24 ± 0.51 | 2.69 ± 0.29 | 2.47 |
| F2 | 2.27 ± 0.21 | 2.22 ± 0.25 | 2.25 |
| R1 | 2.96 ± 0.19 | 2.85 ± 0.12 | 2.91 |
| R2 | 2.45 ± 0.03 | 3.09 ± 0.11 | 2.77 |
| F1R1 | 2.47 ± 0.15 | 2.94 ± 0.35 | 2.71 |
| F1R2 | 2.69 ± 0.11 | 2.79 ± 0.39 | 2.74 |
| F2R1 | 2.70 ± 0.39 | 2.51 ± 0.43 | 2.61 |
| F2R2 | 2.47 ± 0.29 | 2.73 ± 0.24 | 2.60 |
| 2.53 | 2.70 | ||
Phosphorus (P) concentration (mg kg-1) of soybean leaves at the end of the Compatibility experiment.
| P ( mg kg-1) | Cultivar: Emese | Cultivar: Aliz | LSD5% 298 |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | 1629 ± 126 | 1593 ± 245 | 1611 |
| F1 | 1889 ± 307 | 1907 ± 361 | 1898 |
| F2 | 1599 ± 326 | 1325 ± 343 | 1462 |
| R1 | 1825 ± 138 | 1466 ± 137 | 1645 |
| R2 | 1465 ± 137 | 1512 ± 188 | 1488 |
| F1R1 | 1649 ± 320 | 1634 ± 227 | 1641 |
| F1R2 | 1703 ± 206 | 1644 ± 513 | 1674 |
| F2R1 | 1522 ± 272 | 1259 ± 343 | 1390 |
| F2R2 | 1365 ± 373 | 1396 ± 443 | 1381 |
| 1627 | 1526 | ||
FIGURE 2Changes in (A) shoot dry weight (SDW), (B) leaf area (LA), (C) root dry weight (RDW), (D) node number (NN), and (E) root:shoot ratio (RSR) of two soybean cultivars (Emese and Aliz) exposed to well-watered (WW) and drought-stressed (DS) conditions. Error bars represent LSD values, different letters mean significant differences (in case of transformed data) at p < 0.05 (n = 5).
FIGURE 3(A) Leaf relative water content (RWC), (B) drought-induced stress symptoms (DSS), (C) AMF colonization (M%), (D) chlorophyll-a fluorescence (Fv/Fm) and (E) root electrical capacitance (CR) of control (C) and co-inoculated (F1R1, F2R2) soybeans for different cultivars (Emese, Aliz) under well-watered (WW) and drought-stressed (DS) conditions. Error bars represent LSD values, different letters mean significant differences (in case of pairwise t-test) at p < 0.05.
FIGURE 4(A) Relationship between root electrical capacitance (CR) and root dry weight (RDW) of soybean cultivars (Emese, Aliz) and (B) RDW of control and co-inoculated (F1R1, F2R1) soybeans for different cultivars (Emese, Aliz) under well-watered (WW) and drought-stressed (DS) conditions.
Nitrogen (N) content (%) of soybean leaves at the end of the Drought stress experiment.
| N (%) | Cultivar: Emese | Cultivar: Aliz | LSD5% 0.36 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WW | C | 1.33 ± 0.33 | 1.51 ± 0.81 | 1.42 |
| F1R1 | 3.12 ± 0.27 | 2.96 ± 0.24 | 3.04 | |
| F2R1 | 3.08 ± 0.26 | 3.27 ± 0.32 | 3.18 | |
| DS | C | 1.49 ± 0.39 | 1.20 ± 0.19 | 1.34 |
| F1R1 | 3.04 ± 0.23 | 2.93 ± 0.47 | 2.99 | |
| F2R1 | 3.06 ± 0.26 | 3.10 ± 0.54 | 3.08 | |
| 2.52 | 2.49 | |||
Phosphorus (P) concentration (mg kg-1) of soybean leaves at the end of Drought stress experiment.
| P (mg kg-1) | Cultivar: Emese | Cultivar: Aliz | LSD5% 333 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WW | C | 3871 ± 780 | 3155 ± 345 | 3513 |
| F1R1 | 2693 ± 350 | 2300 ± 126 | 2496 | |
| F2R1 | 2523 ± 131 | 2360 ± 118 | 2441 | |
| DS | C | 3091 ± 334 | 3342 ± 616 | 3217 |
| F1R1 | 2744 ± 344 | 2714 ± 271 | 2729 | |
| F2R1 | 2968 ± 103 | 2682 ± 226 | 2825 | |
| 2981 | 2759 | |||