Literature DB >> 30482717

Maternal critical care in resource-limited settings. Narrative review.

M Vasco1, S Pandya2, D Van Dyk3, D G Bishop4, R Wise5, R A Dyer6.   

Abstract

Maternal critical care reflects interdisciplinary care in any hospital area according to the severity of illness of the pregnant woman. The admission rate to intensive care units is below 1% (0.08-0.76%) of deliveries in high-income countries, and ranges from 0.13% to 4.6% in low- and middle-income countries. Mortality in these patients is high and varies from 0% to 4.9% of admissions in high-income countries, and from 2% to 43.6% in low- and middle-income countries. Obstetric haemorrhage, sepsis, preeclampsia, human immunodeficiency virus complications and tropical diseases are the main reasons for intensive care unit admission in low middle-income countries. Bedside assessment tools, such as early warning scores, may help to identify critically ill patients and those at risk of deterioration. There is a lack of uniformity in definitions, identification and treatment of critically ill pregnant patients, especially in resource-limited settings. Our aims were to (i) propose a more practical definition of maternal critical care, (ii) discuss maternal mortality in the setting of limited accessibility of critical care units, (iii) provide some accessible tools to improve identification of obstetric patients who may become critically ill, and (iv) confront challenges in providing maternal critical care in resource-limited settings. To improve maternal critical care, training programmes should embrace modern technological educational aids and incorporate new tools and technologies that assist prediction of critical illness in the pregnant patient. The goal must be improved outcomes following early interventions, early initiation of resuscitation, and early transfer to an appropriate level of care, whenever possible.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low- and middle-income countries; Maternal critical care; Maternal deaths; Obstetric early warning score; Resource-limited settings

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30482717     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth        ISSN: 0959-289X            Impact factor:   2.603


  6 in total

1.  Governance commitment to reduce maternal mortality. A political determinant beyond the wealth of the countries.

Authors:  María Teresa Ruiz-Cantero; Marta Guijarro-Garvi; Donna Rose Bean; José Ramón Martínez-Riera; José Fernández-Sáez
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 4.078

Review 2.  Management of peripartum intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.

Authors:  M James Lozada; Varun Goyal; Danielle Levin; Rachel L Walden; Sarah S Osmundson; Luis D Pacheco; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Evaluation of the feasibility of the FAST-M maternal sepsis intervention in Pakistan: a protocol.

Authors:  Sheikh Irfan Ahmed; Raheel Sikandar; Rubina Barolia; Bakhtawar M Hanif Khowaja; Kashif Ali Memon; James Cheshire; Catherine Dunlop; Arri Coomarasamy; Lumaan Sheikh; David Lissauer
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-06-24

4.  A Comparison of Functional Features of Chinese and US Mobile Apps for Pregnancy and Postnatal Care: A Systematic App Store Search and Content Analysis.

Authors:  Hongli Yu; Juan He; Xinghao Wang; Weilin Yang; Bo Sun; Anna Szumilewicz
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-17

5.  Obstetrics mortality and associated factors in intensive care unit of Addis Ababa public hospital in, 2020/21: A hospital based case control study.

Authors:  Asaminew Tasew; Eyayalem Melese; Suleman Jemal; Lemlem Getachew
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-20

6.  A case of total spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Gebrehiwot Asfaw; Atalay Eshetie
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.