Anne-Laure Yailian1, Elsa Revel2, Cléa Tardy2, Aurélie Fontana3, Charline Estublier3, Evelyne Decullier4, Claude Dussart5, Roland Chapurlat3, Christine Pivot2, Audrey Janoly-Dumenil6. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5 place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France; Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, EA 4129 P2S Parcours Santé Systémique, 7-11 rue Guilllaume Paradin, 69008 Lyon, France. Electronic address: annelaureyailian@gmail.com. 2. Department of Pharmacy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5 place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France. 3. Department of Rheumatology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5 place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France; INSERM UMR 1033, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Laennec Faculty of Medicine, 7-11 rue Guillaume Paradin, 69008 Lyon, France. 4. Department of Medical Information, Evaluation and Research, Clinical Research Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 162 avenue Lacassagne, 69003 Lyon, France. 5. Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, EA 4129 P2S Parcours Santé Systémique, 7-11 rue Guilllaume Paradin, 69008 Lyon, France. 6. Department of Pharmacy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5 place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France; Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, EA 4129 P2S Parcours Santé Systémique, 7-11 rue Guilllaume Paradin, 69008 Lyon, France; Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Faculty of Pharmacy, 8 avenue Rockefeller, 69008 Lyon, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pharmacists contribute to reduce the number of medication errors during medication review. Nevertheless, few French studies report the potential clinical impact of pharmacists' interventions performed after detecting drug-related problems. The objective was to evaluate the clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions in a rheumatology ward from medical and pharmaceutical perspectives. METHOD: The analysis was conducted on pharmacists' interventions performed between January 1 and December 31, 2015 in a French teaching hospital. Similar pharmacists' interventions were grouped in one item and they were analysed according to 11 drug categories. The clinical significance of pharmacists' interventions was considered independently by a pharmacist and a rheumatologist using a validated French scale that categorises drug-related problems from minor to catastrophic. The agreement between the two professionals was analysed using the weighted kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Of 1313 prescriptions reviewed, 461 pharmacists' interventions (171 items) were formulated for drug-related problems with an acceptance rate of 67.2%. Of the 418 interventions selected for clinical significance analysis, 235 interventions (56.2%) for the physician and 400 interventions (95.7%) for the pharmacist were at least significant. The two professionals evaluated equally the clinical relevance of 90 items (50.6%). The categories with the most similarities were the analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs (78.1%), the antidiabetics (75.0%) and the anticoagulants (71.4%). The agreement was estimated by a weighted kappa coefficient of 0.29. CONCLUSION: This work highlights the positive clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions in rheumatology and the importance of medico-pharmaceutical collaboration to prevent medication errors.
BACKGROUND: Pharmacists contribute to reduce the number of medication errors during medication review. Nevertheless, few French studies report the potential clinical impact of pharmacists' interventions performed after detecting drug-related problems. The objective was to evaluate the clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions in a rheumatology ward from medical and pharmaceutical perspectives. METHOD: The analysis was conducted on pharmacists' interventions performed between January 1 and December 31, 2015 in a French teaching hospital. Similar pharmacists' interventions were grouped in one item and they were analysed according to 11 drug categories. The clinical significance of pharmacists' interventions was considered independently by a pharmacist and a rheumatologist using a validated French scale that categorises drug-related problems from minor to catastrophic. The agreement between the two professionals was analysed using the weighted kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Of 1313 prescriptions reviewed, 461 pharmacists' interventions (171 items) were formulated for drug-related problems with an acceptance rate of 67.2%. Of the 418 interventions selected for clinical significance analysis, 235 interventions (56.2%) for the physician and 400 interventions (95.7%) for the pharmacist were at least significant. The two professionals evaluated equally the clinical relevance of 90 items (50.6%). The categories with the most similarities were the analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs (78.1%), the antidiabetics (75.0%) and the anticoagulants (71.4%). The agreement was estimated by a weighted kappa coefficient of 0.29. CONCLUSION: This work highlights the positive clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions in rheumatology and the importance of medico-pharmaceutical collaboration to prevent medication errors.
Authors: Amaury Durand; André Gillibert; Sophie Membre; Lisa Mondet; Aurélie Lenglet; Aurélien Mary Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 5.810