Literature DB >> 30482604

Clinical outcomes and significant factors in the survival rate after decompression surgery for patients who were non-ambulatory due to spinal metastases.

Daisuke Tateiwa1, Kazuya Oshima2, Takaaki Nakai3, Yoshinori Imura3, Takaaki Tanaka3, Hidetatsu Outani1, Hironari Tamiya3, Nobuhito Araki4, Norifumi Naka3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of effective chemotherapy regimens and molecular targeting agents are improving the overall survival rates in patients with cancer. However, patients who are non-ambulatory due to metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) may be assessed as unable to tolerate chemotherapy secondary to poor performance status. This means that the ambulatory status of patients with cancer might be significant for survival time.
METHODS: We investigated the functional outcomes and factors influencing overall survival in 31 patients who were non-ambulatory due to MESCC and underwent decompression surgery. The functional outcome was determined by the Frankel grading system. RESULT: Twenty-one patients (68%) improved by at least 1 Frankel grade; 17 patients (55%) became ambulatory postoperatively. Most of postoperatively ambulatory patients could undergo postoperative chemotherapy (14/17, 82%). On the other hand, only a few postoperatively non-ambulatory patients could undergo postoperative chemotherapy (2/15, 13%). We observed a complication rate of 35.5% with specific complications including wound infection, pneumonia, and deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolus. The median survival duration was 7.0 months. Factors that significantly affected the overall survival in univariate analyses were revised Tokuhashi score (RTS) ≥ 4, postoperative chemotherapy, ambulatory status, and complications (RTS ≥ 4, P < 0.05; postoperative chemotherapy, P < 0.001; ambulatory status, P < 0.001; complications, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Decompression surgery for patients who are non-ambulatory due to MESCC directly contributes to functional outcomes and may indirectly contribute to overall survival. If non-ambulatory patients who are assessed as unable to tolerate chemotherapy due to poor performance status regain the ability to walk by decompression surgery, they will have a chance to receive postoperative chemotherapy, thereby increasing their chances of prolonging survival. However, postoperative complications may shorten their survival; therefore, we should carefully consider the surgical indications. RTS is useful for judging the surgical indication.
Copyright © 2018 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30482604     DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  6 in total

1.  A Nomogram to Predict Intra-Spinal Canal Cement Leakage Among Elderly Patients with Spine Metastases: An Internal-Validated Model.

Authors:  Xuedong Shi; Yunpeng Cui; Yuanxing Pan; Bing Wang; Mingxing Lei
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 2.  A systematic review of MIS and open decompression surgery for spinal metastases in the last two decades.

Authors:  Bhoresh Dhamija; Dheeraj Batheja; Birender Singh Balain
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-25

3.  Neurological outcomes after surgery for spinal metastases in symptomatic patients: Does the type of decompression play a role? A comparison between different strategies in a 10-year experience.

Authors:  F Cofano; G Di Perna; A Alberti; B M Baldassarre; M Ajello; N Marengo; F Tartara; F Zenga; D Garbossa
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.072

Review 4.  Separation surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: A qualitative review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Di Perna; Fabio Cofano; Cristina Mantovani; Serena Badellino; Nicola Marengo; Marco Ajello; Ludovico Maria Comite; Giuseppe Palmieri; Fulvio Tartara; Francesco Zenga; Umberto Ricardi; Diego Garbossa
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 4.072

5.  Impact of Spinal Instrumentation on Neurological Outcome in Patients with Intermediate Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS).

Authors:  Moritz Lenschow; Maximilian Lenz; Niklas von Spreckelsen; Julian Ossmann; Johanna Meyer; Julia Keßling; Lukas Nadjiri; Sergej Telentschak; Kourosh Zarghooni; Peter Knöll; Moritz Perrech; Eren Celik; Max Scheyerer; Volker Neuschmelting
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  Evaluating ambulatory function as an outcome following treatment for spinal metastases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lananh Nguyen; Nicole Agaronnik; Marco L Ferrone; Jeffrey N Katz; Andrew J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.