| Literature DB >> 30482062 |
Youssef Dgachi1,2, Hélène Martin3, Rim Malek2, Daniel Jun4, Jana Janockova5, Vendula Sepsova4, Ondrej Soukup5, Isabel Iriepa6, Ignacio Moraleda6, Emna Maalej7, M Carmo Carreiras8, Bernard Refouvelet2, Fakher Chabchoub1, José Marco-Contelles9, Lhassane Ismaili2.
Abstract
In view of the multifactorial nature ofEntities:
Keywords: Alzheimer disease; kojic acid; multitarget small molecules; tacrine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30482062 PMCID: PMC6263107 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2018.1538136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051

. Design of KojoTacrine hybrids.
Scheme 1.Synthesis of racemic KojoTacrines 2a-l
Effects of KojoTacrines 2a-l on human hepatocyte HepG2 cell viability.
| 1 µM | 3 µM | 10 µM | 30 µM | 100 µM | 300 µM | 1000 µM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tacrine | 112.2 ± 4.0 | 113.6 ± 4.8 | 107.8 ± 3.4 | 109.6 ± 4.2 | 101.9 ± 2.4 | 42.4 ± 2.0*** | 10.9 ± 2.0*** |
| 2a | 96.8 ± 1.0 | 94.9 ± 2.9 | 99.3 ± 1.7 | 105.2 ± 5.3 | 108.1 ± 5.0 | 95.0 ± 3.4 | 50.3 ± 5.7** |
| 2b | 105.1 ± 3.1 | 109.5 ± 3.2 | 105.4 ± 1.9 | 107.0 ± 2.9 | 112.9 ± 8.4 | 108.5 ± 5.7 | 87.9 ± 5.2 |
| 2c | 94.7 ± 2.4 | 103.4 ± 2.8 | 99.0 ± 1.1 | 98.2 ± 2.2 | 96.1 ± 1.5 | 88.5 ± 7.1 | 70.7 ± 7.7* |
| 2d | 100.8 ± 2.5 | 98.0 ± 4.1 | 101.5 ± 3.2 | 101.7 ± 1.8 | 99.0 ± 1.1 | 87.2 ± 6.1 | 65.5 ± 1.3* |
| 2e | 95.5 ± 5.5 | 96.1 ± 7.1 | 95.9 ± 5.6 | 98.3 ± 3.8 | 86.1 ± 3.8 | 70.9 ± 4.5* | 41.7 ± 3.0*** |
| 2f | 108.0 ± 6.2 | 96.1 ± 2.5 | 99.2 ± 2.8 | 102.2 ± 7.1 | 100.9 ± 9.2 | 95.3 ± 4.1 | 64.0 ± 8.0* |
| 2g | 101.2 ± 7.1 | 96.5 ± 7.4 | 99.1 ± 3.8 | 108.8 ± 6.1 | 103.1 ± 6.4 | 90.5 ± 9.6 | 62.6 ± 9.7* |
| 2h | 97.4 ± 2.3 | 95.9 ± 3.8 | 100.5 ± 1.5 | 101.4 ± 0.6 | 102.2 ± 1.8 | 87.2 ± 6.7 | 55.3 ± 6.0** |
| 2i | 98.6 ± 1.4 | 100.1 ± 1.9 | 99.4 ± 1.2 | 104.7 ± 2.6 | 95.2 ± 4.7 | 64.4 ± 6.3* | 23.1 ± 6.0*** |
| 2j | 97.6 ± 2.0 | 101.4 ± 5.4 | 105.1 ± 5.5 | 99.6 ± 2.4 | 102.1 ± 6.9 | 52.7 ± 8.3** | 14.5 ± 6.4*** |
| 2k | 101.4 ± 4.8 | 104.0 ± 8.9 | 94.9 ± 2.6 | 95.8 ± 2.5 | 100.7 ± 3.1 | 60.1 ± 10.4* | 37.2 ± 5.9*** |
| 2l | 99.9 ± 2.7 | 102.1 ± 2.3 | 102.2 ± 2.6 | 99.9 ± 3.2 | 88.9 ± 8.0 | 68.3 ± 9.3* | 50.5 ± 7.5** |
Data are expressed as percent of cell viability as compared to control cultures (DMSO-treated cells). Means ± SEM of triplicates from three different cultures. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, as compared to the control cultures (one-way ANOVA).
Inhibition of EeAChE, hACHE, eqBuChE, (IC50, μM) , and ORAC-FL values for KTs 2a-d, 2f-h, 2l, tacrine, and ferulic acid (FA).
| KT | R | hAChE (IC50 µM) | ORAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | 3.30 ± 0.09 | 12.15 ± 0.09 | – | 2.58 ± 0.22 | |
| 4-CH3 | 1.40 ± 0.00 | 10.09 ± 0.09 | 13.7 ± 1.7 | 2.96 ± 0.18 | |
| 2-OCH3 | 2.39 ± 0.02 | – | – | 6.05 ± 0.41 | |
| 4.52 ± 0.24 | |||||
| 2-F | 2.11 ± 0.01 | 6.69 ± 0.10 | – | 3.85 ± 0.42 | |
| 3-F | 2.14 ± 0.12 | 4.54 ± 0.20 | – | 4.34 ± 0.17 | |
| 4-F | 3.44 ± 0.04 | – | – | 4.69 ± 0.18 | |
| 2,6-diCl | 2.12 ± 0.09 | – | – | 6.14 ± 0.40 | |
| Tacrine | – | 0.031 ± 0.006 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.13 ± 0.00 | 0.2 ± 0.1 |
| FA | – | – | – | – | 3.74 ± 0.22 |
| KA | – | – | – | – | 2.51 ± 0.17 |
Inhibition curves were obtained by nonlinear regression. Each IC50 value is the mean ± SEM of quadruplicate of at least three different experiments.
b% Inhibition under 50% at 10 μM.
cNot determined.
Neuroprotective activity of KTs 2b-d and 2f on Oligomycin/Rotenone (O at 10 µM)/Rotenone (R at 30 µM), and Aβ 1–40 (30 µM) peptide-induced cell death in SH-SY5Y cells.
| KojoTacrine | Dose | O/R (%) | A |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 µM | 19.66 ± 0.07 | 27.85 ± 0.15* | |
| 10 µM | 3.65 ± 0.07 | np | |
| 3 µM | 12.18 ± 0.08 | np | |
| 10 µM | 16.56 ± 0.02 | np | |
| 3 µM | 24.35 ± 0.05* | 42.92 ± 0.20*** | |
| 10 µM | 12.53 ± 0.09 | 41.19 ± 0.18*** | |
| 3 µM | 16.50 ± 0.07 | 25.10 ± 0.06* | |
| 10 µM | np | 4.1 ± 0.04 | |
| 1 µM | 50.1 ± 3.42** | 35.5 ± 4.1** | |
| 3 µM | 59.1 ± 4.50** | 60.2 ± 3.57*** | |
| 1 µM | np | 51.56 ± 0.18 *** | |
| 3 µM | np | 65.11 ± 0.20*** |
Neuroprotection was expressed in percentage viable cells of control condition. Data are the means ± SEM of quadruplicates from three different cultures; *p < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01,***p < 0.001, as compared to the control cultures (one-way ANOVA); np: not protective.
Figure 2.Binding mode of inhibitor ( Compound ( is pictured as ball and sticks in pink and the side chains of the mobile residues are represented in the pale pink. The sub-sites of the active site were coloured: oxyanion hole (OH) in fuchsia, anionic sub-site (AS) in orange, except Trp86, acyl binding pocket (ABP) in yellow, catalytic triad (CT) in green and PAS in light violet. Hydrogen bond interactions are represented as dashed black lines.
Figure 3.Docking pose of inhibitor ( Compound ( is illustrated as ball and sticks in blue and the side chains of the mobile residues are represented in pale blue. The subsites of the active site were coloured: Oxyanion hole (OH) in fuchsia, anionic sub-site (AS) in orange, except Trp86, acyl binding pocket (ABP) in yellow, catalytic triad (CT) in green, and peripheral anionic subsite (PAS) in light violet. Hydrogen bond interactions are represented as dashed black lines.