Literature DB >> 30482000

Size and shape of the inferior vena cava before and after a fluid challenge: a pilot study.

Daniele G Biasucci1, Alessandro Cina2,3, Maria Calabrese4, Maria E Antoniucci4, Carlo Cavaliere5, Francesca Bevilacqua4, Franco Cavaliere3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent meta-analyses failed to support the reliability of ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava (IVC) to predict fluid responsiveness. However, the techniques utilized were heterogeneous. We hypothesized that the variability of the elliptic section and caliber of the IVC along its course may influence ultrasound evaluation. Therefore, we investigated IVC size and shape at four levels, before and after a fluid challenge.
METHODS: Twenty mechanically-ventilated adult patients who received a fluid challenge after cardiac surgery were enrolled. They were regarded as responders if the cardiac index increased more than 15%. Before and after the fluid challenge, IVC anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LA) diameters, the flat ratio, and the distensibility index were assessed by ultrasound just above the iliac veins, at the confluence of the renal veins, before the confluence of the hepatic veins (where blood flow velocity was also measured), and after it.
RESULTS: At all levels, IVC section was elliptical, so that IVC diameters varied between a minimum and a maximum according to the measurement angle. Such interval increased in correspondence of the renal veins, where IVC section was more eccentric. The distensibility index was higher when assessed on AP diameters. After the fluid challenge, non-responders showed a diffuse increase of AP diameters, whereas responders showed an increase of blood velocity before the confluence of the hepatic veins.
CONCLUSIONS: The elliptic section should be considered when assessing IVC size. AP diameters are shorter and more affected by the respiratory cycle. After a fluid challenge, an increase of blood velocity associated with unchanged AP diameters may suggest fluid responsiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30482000     DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.13041-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  3 in total

Review 1.  Fluid challenge in critically ill patients receiving haemodynamic monitoring: a systematic review and comparison of two decades.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Lorenzo Calabrò; Luca Pugliese; Aulona Lulja; Alexandra Sopuch; Daniela Rosalba; Emanuela Morenghi; Glenn Hernandez; Xavier Monnet; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 19.334

2.  Different preoperative fluids do not affect the hemodynamic status but gastric volume: results of a randomized crossover pilot study.

Authors:  Shuhua Zhao; Qiong Ling; Shaonong Huang; Qianqian Zhu; Fengping Liang; Zhongmei Lin; Yingqing Deng
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.376

3.  Measurement site of inferior vena cava diameter affects the accuracy with which fluid responsiveness can be predicted in spontaneously breathing patients: a post hoc analysis of two prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Morgan Caplan; Arthur Durand; Perrine Bortolotti; Delphine Colling; Julien Goutay; Thibault Duburcq; Elodie Drumez; Anahita Rouze; Saad Nseir; Michael Howsam; Thierry Onimus; Raphael Favory; Sebastien Preau
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 6.925

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.