Literature DB >> 30481697

Kinematics and shock attenuation during a prolonged run on the athletic track as measured with inertial magnetic measurement units.

Jasper Reenalda1, Erik Maartens2, Jaap H Buurke2, Allison H Gruber3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tibial stress fractures are common running related injury and their etiology may include biomechanical factors like impact forces, shock attenuation, lower limb kinematics and how these factors are influenced by intense or prolonged running. Inertial-magnetic measurement units (IMUs) have recently emerged as an alternative to motion capture but their use to date was mostly limited to segmental and joint motion. RESEARCH QUESTION: The present study sought to examine the effects of a prolonged run on shock attenuation, peak tibial and sacral acceleration (PTA, PSA), and lower limb kinematics using IMUs.
METHODS: Ten trained male runners (31 +/- 5 yr, 183 +/- 3 cm, 76 +/- 9 kg) performed a twenty-minute prolonged run on an athletic track at estimated lactate threshold speed. Eight IMUs, positioned over the feet, lower and uppers legs, sacrum and sternum, were used to calculate joint kinematics, impact parameters and shock attenuation in the time domain (1-(PSA/PTA)*100).
RESULTS: PTA increased while PSA and shock attenuation did not change following the prolonged run. Hip and knee flexion at midstance decreased. Vertical lower leg angle at initial contact did not change.
CONCLUSION: By using IMUs, it was shown that a prolonged run at estimated lactate threshold speed had significant effects on kinematics and tibial acceleration parameters. By modifying hip and knee joint kinematics during stance, the body was able to maintain sacral acceleration possibly by shifting from active shock attenuation to more passive mechanisms. SIGNIFICANCE: The present study shows that inertial sensors can be used in outdoor running to measure joint kinematics and kinetic parameters like PTA, PSA and shock attenuation simultaneously. The results of this study show new insights into how the body copes with impact during prolonged running.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inertial sensors; Kinematics; Peak tibial acceleration; Prolonged running; Shock attenuation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30481697     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  17 in total

Review 1.  Use of Wearable Technology to Measure Activity in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Meir T Marmor; Bernd Grimm; Andrew M Hanflik; Peter H Richter; Sureshan Sivananthan; Seth Robert Yarboro; Benedikt J Braun
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  Relationship Between Ground Reaction Force Characteristics and Bone Mineral Density of the Hip and Spine in Male Runners.

Authors:  Michele Leblanc; Allison Burdullis; Marcus McKinnon; Steven Hawkins
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-05-01

3.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 4.  The Use of Wearable Sensors for Preventing, Assessing, and Informing Recovery from Sport-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ezio Preatoni; Elena Bergamini; Silvia Fantozzi; Lucie I Giraud; Amaranta S Orejel Bustos; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Valentina Camomilla
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Augmented Reality-Based Rehabilitation of Gait Impairments: Case Report.

Authors:  Jeremia Philipp Oskar Held; Kevin Yu; Connor Pyles; Janne Marieke Veerbeek; Felix Bork; Sandro-Michael Heining; Nassir Navab; Andreas Rüdiger Luft
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Inertial Sensor-Based Lower Limb Joint Kinematics: A Methodological Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ive Weygers; Manon Kok; Marco Konings; Hans Hallez; Henri De Vroey; Kurt Claeys
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-26       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  A mobile MRI field study of the biochemical cartilage reaction of the knee joint during a 4,486 km transcontinental multistage ultra-marathon using T2* mapping.

Authors:  Uwe Schütz; Martin Ehrhardt; Sabine Göd; Christian Billich; Meinrad Beer; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effects of Wearable Devices with Biofeedback on Biomechanical Performance of Running-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexandra Giraldo-Pedroza; Winson Chiu-Chun Lee; Wing-Kai Lam; Robyn Coman; Gursel Alici
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Towards Machine Learning-Based Detection of Running-Induced Fatigue in Real-World Scenarios: Evaluation of IMU Sensor Configurations to Reduce Intrusiveness.

Authors:  Luca Marotta; Jaap H Buurke; Bert-Jan F van Beijnum; Jasper Reenalda
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Sensor-to-Segment Calibration Methodologies for Lower-Body Kinematic Analysis with Inertial Sensors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Léonie Pacher; Christian Chatellier; Rodolphe Vauzelle; Laetitia Fradet
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.