K G van Leeuwen1, H Sun2, M Tabaeizadeh2, A F Struck3, M J A M van Putten4, M B Westover5. 1. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA. 4. University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: mwestover@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Electroencephalography (EEG) is a central part of the medical evaluation for patients with neurological disorders. Training an algorithm to label the EEG normal vs abnormal seems challenging, because of EEG heterogeneity and dependence of contextual factors, including age and sleep stage. Our objectives were to validate prior work on an independent data set suggesting that deep learning methods can discriminate between normal vs abnormal EEGs, to understand whether age and sleep stage information can improve discrimination, and to understand what factors lead to errors. METHODS: We train a deep convolutional neural network on a heterogeneous set of 8522 routine EEGs from the Massachusetts General Hospital. We explore several strategies for optimizing model performance, including accounting for age and sleep stage. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on an independent test set (n = 851) is 0.917 marginally improved by including age (AUC = 0.924), and both age and sleep stages (AUC = 0.925), though not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The model architecture generalizes well to an independent dataset. Adding age and sleep stage to the model does not significantly improve performance. SIGNIFICANCE: Insights learned from misclassified examples, and minimal improvement by adding sleep stage and age suggest fruitful directions for further research.
OBJECTIVES: Electroencephalography (EEG) is a central part of the medical evaluation for patients with neurological disorders. Training an algorithm to label the EEG normal vs abnormal seems challenging, because of EEG heterogeneity and dependence of contextual factors, including age and sleep stage. Our objectives were to validate prior work on an independent data set suggesting that deep learning methods can discriminate between normal vs abnormal EEGs, to understand whether age and sleep stage information can improve discrimination, and to understand what factors lead to errors. METHODS: We train a deep convolutional neural network on a heterogeneous set of 8522 routine EEGs from the Massachusetts General Hospital. We explore several strategies for optimizing model performance, including accounting for age and sleep stage. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on an independent test set (n = 851) is 0.917 marginally improved by including age (AUC = 0.924), and both age and sleep stages (AUC = 0.925), though not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The model architecture generalizes well to an independent dataset. Adding age and sleep stage to the model does not significantly improve performance. SIGNIFICANCE: Insights learned from misclassified examples, and minimal improvement by adding sleep stage and age suggest fruitful directions for further research.
Authors: Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun Journal: Nature Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jonathan J Halford; Robert J Schalkoff; Jing Zhou; Selim R Benbadis; William O Tatum; Robert P Turner; Saurabh R Sinha; Nathan B Fountain; Amir Arain; Paul B Pritchard; Ekrem Kutluay; Gabriel Martz; Jonathan C Edwards; Chad Waters; Brian C Dean Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Arthur C Grant; Samah G Abdel-Baki; Jeremy Weedon; Vanessa Arnedo; Geetha Chari; Ewa Koziorynska; Catherine Lushbough; Douglas Maus; Tresa McSween; Katherine A Mortati; Alexandra Reznikov; Ahmet Omurtag Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Stefan Jonas; Andrea O Rossetti; Mauro Oddo; Simon Jenni; Paolo Favaro; Frederic Zubler Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Nalini M Singh; Jordan B Harrod; Sandya Subramanian; Mitchell Robinson; Ken Chang; Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak; Adrian Vasile Dalca; Simon Eickhoff; Michael Fox; Loraine Franke; Polina Golland; Daniel Haehn; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Lauren J O'Donnell; Yangming Ou; Yogesh Rathi; Shan H Siddiqi; Haoqi Sun; M Brandon Westover; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Randy L Gollub Journal: Neuroinformatics Date: 2022-03-28
Authors: Rutger R van de Leur; Lennart J Blom; Efstratios Gavves; Irene E Hof; Jeroen F van der Heijden; Nick C Clappers; Pieter A Doevendans; Rutger J Hassink; René van Es Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 5.501