Literature DB >> 30481321

A Clinical Rule for Preoperative Prediction of BRAF Mutation Status in Craniopharyngiomas.

Shingo Fujio1,2,3,4, Tareq A Juratli1,2, Kazunori Arita3, Hirofumi Hirano3, Yushi Nagano3,4, Tomoko Takajo3, Koji Yoshimoto3,4, Ivanna V Bihun1, Alexander B Kaplan1, Naema Nayyar1, Alexandria L Fink2, Mia S Bertalan1, Shilpa S Tummala2, William T Curry2, Pamela S Jones2, Maria Martinez-Lage5, Daniel P Cahill2, Fred G Barker2, Priscilla K Brastianos1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Papillary craniopharyngiomas are characterized by BRAFV600E mutations. Targeted therapy can elicit a dramatic radiographic regression of these tumors. Therefore, prediction of BRAF mutation status before definitive surgery could enable neoadjuvant treatment strategies.
OBJECTIVE: To establish preoperative prediction criteria to identify patients with a BRAF mutant craniopharyngioma.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients with craniopharyngioma were included in this study. We determined BRAF mutation status by targeted sequencing. After scoring interobserver variability between presurgical clinical data and radiographic features, we established a diagnostic rule for BRAF mutation in our discovery cohort. We then validated the rule in an independent cohort.
RESULTS: The BRAFV600E mutation was detected in 12 of 42 patients in the discovery cohort. There were no patients under age 18 with BRAF mutation. Calcification was rare in tumors with BRAF mutation (P < .001), and 92% of them were supradiaphragmatic in location. Combining these 3 features-older than 18 years, absence of calcification, and supradiaphragmatic tumor location-we established a rule for predicting BRAF mutation. In cases where all 3 criteria were fulfilled, the sensitivity and specificity for the presence of BRAF mutation were 83% and 93%, respectively. In the validation cohort (n = 22), the sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 89%.
CONCLUSION: We propose predictive criteria for a BRAF mutation in craniopharyngioma using preoperative clinical and radiographic data. This rule may be useful in identifying patients who could potentially benefit from neoadjuvant BRAFV600E-targeted systemic therapies. © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF V600E mutation; Clinical rule; Craniopharyngioma; Papillary; Prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30481321     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  10 in total

1.  Targeted treatment of papillary craniopharyngiomas harboring BRAF V600E mutations.

Authors:  Tareq A Juratli; Pamela S Jones; Nancy Wang; Megha Subramanian; Simon J B Aylwin; Yazmin Odia; Elham Rostami; Olafur Gudjonsson; Brian L Shaw; Daniel P Cahill; Evanthia Galanis; Fred G Barker; Sandro Santagata; Priscilla K Brastianos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Strictly third ventricle craniopharyngiomas: pathological verification, anatomo-clinical characterization and surgical results from a comprehensive overview of 245 cases.

Authors:  Ruth Prieto; Laura Barrios; José M Pascual
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Duct-like diverticulum at the base of third ventricle tumors: a morphological signature diagnostic of papillary craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  José María Pascual; Ruth Prieto; Rodrigo Carrasco; Laura Barrios
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  90-Day Bundled Payment Simulation, Health Care Utilization, and Complications following Craniopharyngioma Resection in Adult Patients.

Authors:  Nicholas Dietz; Mayur Sharma; Kevin John; Dengzhi Wang; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Sriprakash Mokshagundam; Martin F Bjurström; Maxwell Boakye; Brian J Williams; Norberto Andaluz
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-12-16

5.  Immunohistochemistry or Molecular Analysis: Which Method Is Better for Subtyping Craniopharyngioma?

Authors:  Noriaki Fukuhara; Takeo Iwata; Naoko Inoshita; Katsuhiko Yoshimoto; Masanobu Kitagawa; Hirokazu Fukuhara; Keita Tatsushima; Mitsuo Yamaguchi-Okada; Akira Takeshita; Junko Ito; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Shozo Yamada; Hiroshi Nishioka
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.943

6.  In Reply: A Clinical Rule for Preoperative Prediction of BRAF Mutation Status in Craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  Shingo Fujio; Tareq A Juratli; Daniel P Cahill; Fred G Barker; Priscilla K Brastianos
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Subtype-dependent difference of glucose transporter 1 and hexokinase II expression in craniopharyngioma: an immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  Naoto Mukada; Masahiko Tosaka; Nozomi Matsumura; Rei Yamaguchi; Masanori Aihara; Koji Isoda; Tetsuya Higuchi; Yoshito Tsushima; Hideaki Yokoo; Yuhei Yoshimoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Aggressive Childhood-onset Papillary Craniopharyngioma Managed With Vemurafenib, a BRAF Inhibitor.

Authors:  Constance L Chik; Frank K H van Landeghem; Jacob C Easaw; Vivek Mehta
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2021-03-16

9.  Surgical aspects in craniopharyngioma treatment.

Authors:  Shingo Fujio; Tomoko Hanada; Masanori Yonenaga; Yushi Nagano; Mika Habu; Kazunori Arita; Koji Yoshimoto
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2020-10-30

Review 10.  Neoadjuvant B-RAF and MEK Inhibitor Targeted Therapy for Adult Papillary Craniopharyngiomas: A New Treatment Paradigm.

Authors:  Francesco Calvanese; Timothée Jacquesson; Romain Manet; Alexandre Vasiljevic; Hélène Lasolle; Francois Ducray; Gerald Raverot; Emmanuel Jouanneau
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.055

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.